Yeah, and they have no ability to cut the satellite uplink GPS so that it suddenly becomes much harder to track said ships. After all, we have satellites to spare to follow every ship on the sea all the time... <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Well unless they have Cold Fusion powered engines, they will leave a trail. There are IR satellites that record every hot thing on the planet that moves ( courtesy of the US military ). It is much more efficient than using Radar to detect missile launches. Unless it detects something moving rather fast the data is just kept for historical record and can be analysed after the fact.
Comments
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,899206,00.html"; target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,899206,00.html</a>;
<a href="http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2003/02/21/1045792101.htm"; target="_blank">http://www.etaiwannews.com/World/2003/02/21/1045792101.htm</a>;
<img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[oyvey]" />
<strong>
Yeah, and they have no ability to cut the satellite uplink GPS so that it suddenly becomes much harder to track said ships. After all, we have satellites to spare to follow every ship on the sea all the time... <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Well unless they have Cold Fusion powered engines,
EDIT: I hate when I make bad typing mistakes.
[ 02-21-2003: Message edited by: MrBillData ]</p>
Name all four ships for bonus points.
front view of the more famously named ones
[ 02-21-2003: Message edited by: curiousuburb ]</p>