technically, there was nothing pornographic about the images ra linked to. the women were as fully clothed (or moreso) than other images in this thread (hell, how you can take down those links, yet leave up the suvari images in plain view is beyond me...). the poses were simply more suggestive. sure, you could "directory dive" once you were at those sites, but you do that of your own choosing.
IMNSHO, i think you were wrong to remove those links.
Comments
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Ra ]</p>
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Ra ]</p>
<strong>
Sorry, Ra, but in my opinion, that's ugly.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Don't listen to him, Ra. He doesn't know any better.
<strong>
hot enough for ya?</strong><hr></blockquote>
the woman is not hot, even in infrared
Docs, gotta love em'.
Now where is that pic to stay on topic??????
<a href="http://www.googirl.com.ar"; target="_blank">http://www.googirl.com.ar</a>;
<a href="http://www.yesterme.com/pinups.html"; target="_blank">http://www.yesterme.com/pinups.html</a>;
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Ra ]</p>
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Jamie ]</p>
<strong>
Now we know why you became a doctor. The truth comes out!</strong><hr></blockquote>
Right, some people here will paid to see naked women, for me , well it's just the contrary
On a more serious note, i try to respect as much as i can the patients who came to see me. Some doctors failed to do it, and have a lot of problems...
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Ra ]</p>
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: Jamie ]</p>
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanpatt/.Pictures/Photo Album Pictures/2003-03-02 10.52.54 -0800/Image-120776E74CE011D7.jpg" target="_blank">
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanpatt/.Pictures/Photo Album Pictures/2003-03-02 10.52.54 -0800/Image-1207DA5E4CE011D7.jpg" target="_blank">
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanpatt/.Pictures/Photo Album Pictures/2003-03-02 10.52.54 -0800/Image-12083EF54CE011D7.jpg" target="_blank">
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanpatt/.Pictures/Photo Album Pictures/2003-03-02 10.52.54 -0800/Image-1206F9F64CE011D7.jpg" target="_blank">
<a href="http://homepage.mac.com/jonathanpatt/.Pictures/Photo Album Pictures/2003-03-02 10.52.54 -0800/Image-11EF52784CE011D7.jpg" target="_blank">
[ 03-02-2003: Message edited by: Logan Cale ]</p>
<strong>Ra, please stop linking us to porn pages.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Ra, ignore the dirty bastard. No one made him click on those links.
Back on topic.
Ra, check your PMs.
<strong>No more links to porn please.
Ra, check your PMs.</strong><hr></blockquote>
um, not to butt in, but i'll butt in...
technically, there was nothing pornographic about the images ra linked to. the women were as fully clothed (or moreso) than other images in this thread (hell, how you can take down those links, yet leave up the suvari images in plain view is beyond me...). the poses were simply more suggestive. sure, you could "directory dive" once you were at those sites, but you do that of your own choosing.
IMNSHO, i think you were wrong to remove those links.
[ 03-03-2003: Message edited by: rok ]</p>