Apple victorious in WIPO dispute over ipods.com domain

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 25
    jfanningjfanning Posts: 3,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Prof. Peabody View Post


    I'd be surprised if the classic survives this year for instance, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the nano was either axed or renamed as something besides an 'iPod' as well. If I was Jobs, I would make an "iPod classic" app that imitated the click-wheel so that the iPod lives on virtually, but basically delete the whole line otherwise, leaving just the touch.



    Apple doesn't split their sales numbers, they will do this for a reason, because the majority of the sales will be for the cheaper models.



    As for cancelling the Classic, what would they replace it with? The 64GB touch is NZ$663, the Classic is nz$439, so I have to spend 50% more to get under half the storage?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 25
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jfanning View Post


    Apple doesn't split their sales numbers, they will do this for a reason, because the majority of the sales will be for the cheaper models.



    As for cancelling the Classic, what would they replace it with? The 64GB touch is NZ$663, the Classic is nz$439, so I have to spend 50% more to get under half the storage?



    You realize the only reason we assume it will be discontinued is that there's evidence there'll be a 128GB iPod touch this year, right?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 25
    jfanningjfanning Posts: 3,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    You realize the only reason we assume it will be discontinued is that there's evidence there'll be a 128GB iPod touch this year, right?



    Which is still smaller (and will be more expensive) than the current iPod Classic.



    And you must know the rule when you assume things?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 25
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jfanning View Post


    Which is still smaller (and will be more expensive) than the current iPod Classic.



    Implying that Apple cares about that.



    Quote:

    And you must know the rule when you assume things?



    It's the same as when you imply, I believe, just not nearly as catchy as the one for implication.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 25
    jfanningjfanning Posts: 3,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    Implying that Apple cares about that.



    I would like to think that Apple cares about sales, after all I believe that is how they make money.



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    It's the same as when you imply, I believe, just not nearly as catchy as the one for implication.



    What?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.