Apple should at least bid to maximise these copycats' costs to purchase the patents. I could see an Apple, M$, RIM etc agreement - Google and Android are the enemy and must be brought to their knees, their noses in the sewer, their privates torn off, their offspring sold as cat food, . . .
No need to mince words here. Tell us what you really think.\
Ah, got it. Apple gets sued simply because they have money and Google doesn't. Google gets sued because they use others intellectual property without paying for it, but Apple does. Glad that's cleared up. Wouldn't want anyone to sue one of those guys for the wrong reasons.
Ah, got it. Apple gets sued simply because they have money and Google doesn't. Google gets sued because they use others intellectual property without paying for it, but Apple does. Glad that's cleared up. Wouldn't want anyone to sue one of those guys for the wrong reasons.
Actually, there are a few companies suing both Apple and Google. Follow the money.
All the components (except A5, which Samsung doesn't use anyway) are designed by Samsung. Why shouldn't Samsung use them in their "clones"?
All the design of Apples technology is drawn up here in the united states and shipped overseas to be physically built by outsourced companies. Samsung does not own the original designs they are blatantly copying.
All the design of Apples technology is drawn up here in the united states and shipped overseas to be physically built by outsourced companies. Samsung does not own the original designs they are blatantly copying.
Do you actually think Apple designs memory chips and displays? Why do you think Samsung, LG, Sony and Toshiba all have more patents than Apple?
Comments
Apple should at least bid to maximise these copycats' costs to purchase the patents. I could see an Apple, M$, RIM etc agreement - Google and Android are the enemy and must be brought to their knees, their noses in the sewer, their privates torn off, their offspring sold as cat food, . . .
No need to mince words here. Tell us what you really think.
Follow the money!
Ah, got it. Apple gets sued simply because they have money and Google doesn't. Google gets sued because they use others intellectual property without paying for it, but Apple does. Glad that's cleared up. Wouldn't want anyone to sue one of those guys for the wrong reasons.
Ah, got it. Apple gets sued simply because they have money and Google doesn't. Google gets sued because they use others intellectual property without paying for it, but Apple does. Glad that's cleared up. Wouldn't want anyone to sue one of those guys for the wrong reasons.
Actually, there are a few companies suing both Apple and Google. Follow the money.
All the components (except A5, which Samsung doesn't use anyway) are designed by Samsung. Why shouldn't Samsung use them in their "clones"?
All the design of Apples technology is drawn up here in the united states and shipped overseas to be physically built by outsourced companies. Samsung does not own the original designs they are blatantly copying.
All the design of Apples technology is drawn up here in the united states and shipped overseas to be physically built by outsourced companies. Samsung does not own the original designs they are blatantly copying.
Do you actually think Apple designs memory chips and displays? Why do you think Samsung, LG, Sony and Toshiba all have more patents than Apple?