Rendering shows off Apple's new, simplified Fifth Ave glass cube

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 48
    luisdiasluisdias Posts: 277member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Robin Huber View Post


    No, me too. Glass in itself is invisible, it's the edges that refract light light and give it dimension and interest. Imagine a polished diamond cube without facets. It would make sense if the building behind were some kind of architectural landmark that you wanted to get out of the way of. But it appears to be an uninspired piece of 20th century functionalism. I don't get it.



    No, it appears you do not. You even have the nerve to call this "functionalism" for fuck's sake. But don't worry, Apple and Steve Jobs apparently do.
  • Reply 22 of 48
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LuisDias View Post


    Unfortunately no. But that's the problem with most humans: they are utterly tasteless.



    I sure hope you are kidding. Humans taste great if you slice them thin enough. ;-)



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LuisDias View Post


    No, it appears you do not. You even have the nerve to call this "functionalism" for f$%k's sake. But don't worry, Apple and Steve Jobs apparently do.



    Angry much?
  • Reply 23 of 48
    Old one looked better.



    And both photos need the same lighting
  • Reply 24 of 48
    robin huberrobin huber Posts: 4,016member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by LuisDias View Post


    No, it appears you do not. You even have the nerve to call this "functionalism" for fuck's sake. But don't worry, Apple and Steve Jobs apparently do.



    Perhaps I was not as clear as I should have been. It was the architecture of the building behind the cube that I characterized as functionalism.
  • Reply 25 of 48
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by O and A View Post


    Looks nice.



    But man the things I'd do with 6.7 million....



    yeah but if 6.7 Million was 1/10,000th of your bank account and you had a big deposit every three months, why the hell not?
  • Reply 26 of 48
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by UMAIR View Post


    is that only me who thinks OLD 1 was much better



    I'm with you, lighting differences aside, I actually think the original looks better. More visually interesting with the joins.



    Oh well, it's his money, he can do with it what he wishes I guess...
  • Reply 27 of 48
    onhkaonhka Posts: 1,025member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by O and A View Post


    Looks nice.



    But man the things I'd do with 6.7 million....



    Bet it would't be putting a few hundred people to work in designing, planning, managing, organizing, manufacturing, transporting, delivering, constructing, organizing, securing, etc., that it takes to accomplish the job.



    Much of it manufactured in America by Americans. Not like the car that is at the top of your list.
  • Reply 28 of 48
    onhkaonhka Posts: 1,025member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MaroonMushroom View Post


    Old one looked better.



    And both photos need the same lighting



    Pretty hard to take a photo of something that isn't there yet.
  • Reply 29 of 48
    New one is wayyyyyy better (imho). Much more seamless than before, before was too broken up for my liking.
  • Reply 30 of 48
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by MaroonMushroom View Post


    Old one looked better.



    And both photos need the same lighting



    The new one is not a photo, but instead is a mock up. Notice that the rendering does not show any internal ceiling lighting. The completed structure is not going to look like that unless the internal lighting has been eliminated or modified.



  • Reply 31 of 48
    zoetmbzoetmb Posts: 2,655member
    Wonder where the old glass is going. That's very expensive glass, so I hope it's going somewhere. Is it going to be Steve's new greenhouse at his new home?



    And at least from the photos/rendering, I think I kind of like the old one better as well. But these things always look better in person.



    Wonder whether Apple or Steve is paying for the new one and what drove the change.
  • Reply 32 of 48
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by UMAIR View Post


    is that only me who thinks OLD 1 was much better



    At first I was with you. I thought it looked like a phone booth then I realized that the cube is still the same, just without the sections and brackets. Man that's some engineering. Some dolt will probably walk right into it since it's much less visible??. at least from the picture.
  • Reply 33 of 48
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    I hope Apple recorded the process from design to glass creation to cube construction.





    Quote:
    Originally Posted by zoetmb View Post


    Wonder where the old glass is going. That's very expensive glass, so I hope it's going somewhere. Is it going to be Steve's new greenhouse at his new home?



    Maybe they will ship the 90 standard panes plus support panes back to Cupertino to be part of their new spaceship center, which also will use unbelievable long and curved pieces of glass.
  • Reply 34 of 48
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by zoetmb View Post


    Wonder where the old glass is going. That's very expensive glass, so I hope it's going somewhere. Is it going to be Steve's new greenhouse at his new home?



    And at least from the photos/rendering, I think I kind of like the old one better as well. But these things always look better in person.



    Wonder whether Apple or Steve is paying for the new one and what drove the change.



    Well, considering that Steve owns the cube, I just assumed he was paying to re-design it.
  • Reply 35 of 48
    successsuccess Posts: 1,040member
    The cube is great but will we have options? Me thinks it will be too glossy. For 6.7 million it better be matte
  • Reply 36 of 48
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Constable Odo View Post


    Less is more. For a cube, it looks absolutely stunning. I hope Apple has a patent on it or everyone will be building them.



    It was NeXT's patented shape. Apple acquired it in '97
  • Reply 37 of 48
    nvidia2008nvidia2008 Posts: 9,262member
    OK. I feel this justifies Apple's replacement of the glass. This looks more elegant than even the Shanghai Store cylinder. Tres chic.
  • Reply 38 of 48
    nvidia2008nvidia2008 Posts: 9,262member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AppleLover2 View Post


    The new one is not a photo, but instead is a mock up. Notice that the rendering does not show any internal ceiling lighting. The completed structure is not going to look like that unless the internal lighting has been eliminated or modified.







    Still, I reckon the difference will be like between a MacBook Pro 13" and MacBook Air 13", even when seen IRL.
  • Reply 39 of 48
    dunksdunks Posts: 1,254member
    I wonder if Apple gave any thought to constructing it from the "highly recyclable" glass used in many of their products.
  • Reply 40 of 48
    solipsismsolipsism Posts: 25,726member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dunks View Post


    I wonder if Apple gave any thought to constructing it from the "highly recyclable" glass used in many of their products.



    What glass isn't highly recyclable?
Sign In or Register to comment.