I'm VERY glad the iPod classic is still available. I prefer a device with extra large capacity and physical buttons for easy control in the car and such. My current 80GB iPod is working fine, but it's no longer large enough for all my music, podcasts, audiobooks and video. I'll definitely be getting an iPod classic before the year is out.
It's good Apple has kept the low priced shuffle too, but since I have a nano, I don't really have a need for a shuffle as well.
Huh? You say you like the physical buttons of the Classic but don't have the need for a shuffle since you have the nano. That doesn't make sense...
I have over 6000 songs and over 18 days of music on the classic, before it repeats, that plugs into an after market radio in my car that operates all the functions of my iPod classic from the dashboard. It's only iPod classic compatible. One day my iPod C will die
you could of course buy a new car stereo if Apple stops selling the Classic. That, or a new car¡
Why wouldn't they keep the Classic and Shuffle? There's a distinctive use case for each product which ensures a steady, even if relatively low, demand.
I presume that is the same question X Serve users where asking
you could of course buy a new car stereo if Apple stops selling the Classic. That, or a new car¡
Well, yes. But I'd rather not buy a new iPod, and a new stereo plus installation. And I really don't plan on buying a new car so I can use a new iPod. Oh hell why not. I'll take five of each. Wrap it up please.
Comments
Apple needs to fix their calendar app cause they clearly don't know what century it is.
Please post a picture or link to the incorrect century you describe instead of having all of us look for this inaccuracy.
Thanks
I'm VERY glad the iPod classic is still available. I prefer a device with extra large capacity and physical buttons for easy control in the car and such. My current 80GB iPod is working fine, but it's no longer large enough for all my music, podcasts, audiobooks and video. I'll definitely be getting an iPod classic before the year is out.
It's good Apple has kept the low priced shuffle too, but since I have a nano, I don't really have a need for a shuffle as well.
Huh? You say you like the physical buttons of the Classic but don't have the need for a shuffle since you have the nano. That doesn't make sense...
I have over 6000 songs and over 18 days of music on the classic, before it repeats, that plugs into an after market radio in my car that operates all the functions of my iPod classic from the dashboard. It's only iPod classic compatible. One day my iPod C will die
you could of course buy a new car stereo if Apple stops selling the Classic. That, or a new car¡
Ever try to use a touch screen with your eyes closed?
The nice thing about the shuffle is that I can work all the functions while at a full run without taking my eyes off the trail.
You can't do that with the new nano or the touch. I use my Shuffle more than my Touch these days.
I fully agree. As much as multiple touch devices are great in what they do, there will probably always be the need for 'blind touch devices'
Why wouldn't they keep the Classic and Shuffle? There's a distinctive use case for each product which ensures a steady, even if relatively low, demand.
I presume that is the same question X Serve users where asking
you could of course buy a new car stereo if Apple stops selling the Classic. That, or a new car¡
Well, yes. But I'd rather not buy a new iPod, and a new stereo plus installation. And I really don't plan on buying a new car so I can use a new iPod. Oh hell why not. I'll take five of each. Wrap it up please.
Apple needs to fix their calendar app cause they clearly don't know what century it is.
Very interesting comment, given that iPods of any kind have only been available this century. Have you reviewed a calendar lately?