nonsense. the only thing both samsung and apple are showing is that the courts have no stomach to deal with this. As for "Pay" Apple lost "with cost" so they had to pay Samsung for their cost in the Appeal.
And didn't I just read today that Samesung has to pay Apple lawyer fees for their debacle in France! i.e. this case ��. Guess u missed that, eh?
Quote:
Not only has Samsung lost their attempt to secure a preliminary injunction against Apple, but they’re also now being forced to pay Apple’s $134,000 in legal fees.
Are you referring to penguins in the Australian Antarctic territory, where the Galaxy Tab 10.1 was banned up until today?
While you are playing your stupid fantasy, how 'bout we ask those mythical penguins if they mind if we set up a nuclear waste dump in Antarctica?
After all, in your delusional mind apparently penguins are the law in Antarctica.
Poor poor man. No sense of the irony with this whole stupid samsung apple thing. This story was meant to make fun of the battle between samsung and apple. But hey if you want to be ultra ultra mature and have no sense of creativity then that as ok. I forgive you. I got nothing to lose. I live a f$#%^ing nightmare every f$%#ing day. I need a sense of humor. Ive been fighting my demons since I got back from over seas. So if you want to judge then go some where els!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This means that Motorola's case against Apple is also complete garbage and bogus, because I think that Motorola is also trying to sue using FRAND patents.
Why is bogus? You can sue for FRAND patents
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
FRAND specifically prohibits you from setting different terms for some customers than for others.
Wrong, it says that they have to be NON discriminatory and fair, but not that they have to be the same for all the parties. And the French court hasn't said anything about the FRAND fees but they have to take to the court.
Comments
nonsense. the only thing both samsung and apple are showing is that the courts have no stomach to deal with this. As for "Pay" Apple lost "with cost" so they had to pay Samsung for their cost in the Appeal.
And didn't I just read today that Samesung has to pay Apple lawyer fees for their debacle in France! i.e. this case ��. Guess u missed that, eh?
Not only has Samsung lost their attempt to secure a preliminary injunction against Apple, but they’re also now being forced to pay Apple’s $134,000 in legal fees.
And didn't I just read today that Samesung has to pay Apple lawyer fees for their debacle in France! i.e. this case ��. Guess u missed that, eh?
Yep, 100,000 euros.
Are you referring to penguins in the Australian Antarctic territory, where the Galaxy Tab 10.1 was banned up until today?
While you are playing your stupid fantasy, how 'bout we ask those mythical penguins if they mind if we set up a nuclear waste dump in Antarctica?
After all, in your delusional mind apparently penguins are the law in Antarctica.
Poor poor man. No sense of the irony with this whole stupid samsung apple thing. This story was meant to make fun of the battle between samsung and apple. But hey if you want to be ultra ultra mature and have no sense of creativity then that as ok. I forgive you. I got nothing to lose. I live a f$#%^ing nightmare every f$%#ing day. I need a sense of humor. Ive been fighting my demons since I got back from over seas. So if you want to judge then go some where els!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This means that Motorola's case against Apple is also complete garbage and bogus, because I think that Motorola is also trying to sue using FRAND patents.
Why is bogus? You can sue for FRAND patents
FRAND specifically prohibits you from setting different terms for some customers than for others.
Wrong, it says that they have to be NON discriminatory and fair, but not that they have to be the same for all the parties. And the French court hasn't said anything about the FRAND fees but they have to take to the court.
"If the Italian bid also fails, the time may come for both Apple and Samsung to realize that you can't win a marathon with a sprint," Mueller says.
I wish Mueller would stop making shit up. From day one Steve said - at the iPhone launch on the second slide: "And boy have we patented it"
Yup, they aren't in it for the long haul but "sprinting".
Seriously - I can understanding people getting fooled into paying him for such drivel - but why does it have to be repeated?
No, that is called "Patent Exhaustion".
Also "hail mary"
time for both to figure out this is a waste of time and money
Time for one anyway. Hardly both