Samsung's business strategy is to copy Apple and after being sued, litigate down to what the courts with accept. it's a money maker if you don't loose Apple's $8 billion dollar screen business and customers don't boycott Samsung's products, not to mention being branded a cheap copy machine.
Samsung feels justified because Apple will bury their TV business when the Apple large screen TVs reach the market. But that rationale doesn't fly in the courts.
Bye Bye Samsuck.
Okay, which one of the usuals created another account. lol
Just to let you know that its illegal on this board.
Comments
Samsung's business strategy is to copy Apple and after being sued, litigate down to what the courts with accept. it's a money maker if you don't loose Apple's $8 billion dollar screen business and customers don't boycott Samsung's products, not to mention being branded a cheap copy machine.
Samsung feels justified because Apple will bury their TV business when the Apple large screen TVs reach the market. But that rationale doesn't fly in the courts.
Bye Bye Samsuck.
Okay, which one of the usuals created another account. lol
Just to let you know that its illegal on this board.
Okay, which one of the usuals created another account. lol
Just to let you know that its illegal on this board.
Illegal? Hardly (unless you can point to a law that's being broken).
It may be a violation of the terms of service, but it's not illegal.