I reread the posts, just to make sure I wasn't imagining things, but, no, I wasn't the one without an argument. Let's recap: I said, "That sentence doesn't say what you are claiming it does, it actually says ...". You replied, over and over, "Yes it does."
That's not what I said.
I said that it was clear to me and was structured in a way that legal arguments are typically structured - and the appeals court apparently agreed.
So we have a respected judge and an appeals court who agree with me that the decision makes sense and you on the other side claiming that it does not.
Comments
I reread the posts, just to make sure I wasn't imagining things, but, no, I wasn't the one without an argument. Let's recap: I said, "That sentence doesn't say what you are claiming it does, it actually says ...". You replied, over and over, "Yes it does."
That's not what I said.
I said that it was clear to me and was structured in a way that legal arguments are typically structured - and the appeals court apparently agreed.
So we have a respected judge and an appeals court who agree with me that the decision makes sense and you on the other side claiming that it does not.
Who is more credible?