Apple wants to improve brightness control on OLED screens
Though Apple has never released a product with an OLED screen, it continues to dabble with the technology behind the scenes, and has proposed a way of improving brightness control on organic light emitting diode displays.
One of the key advantages of OLED is that, unlike LCD, it does not employ a backlight to illuminate the screen. While this can lead to superior picture quality and improved battery life, it can also make adjusting the brightness of the screen more difficult, Apple notes in a newly published patent application discovered by AppleInsider.
The filing, entitled "OLED Driving Technique," explains that traditional LCD brightness is adjusted by simply increasing or decreasing the amount of light emitted by a backlight. But that's not possible with an OLED display, as each pixel on an OLED screen emits light individually.
That means device makers must adjust the amount of power supplied to each OLED pixel, making it a far more complex endeavor to adjust brightness than an LCD display with a dedicated backlight.
"While increasing or decreasing the amount of power may increase or decrease the amount of light emitted by each OLED, the precise amount of light emitted by each OLED may vary according to nonlinear function," Apple's filing reads. "As such, many techniques for adjusting the brightness of OLED screens have conventionally involved performing complex calculations on image data to ensure that when a brightness-adjusted image id displayed on the OLED display, each pixel displays a proper color and brightness."
In other words, the amount of light output by an individual OLED pixel varies nonlinearly with the amount of power supplied to the OLED pixel. As a result, increasing or decreasing the brightness does not directly correlate to simply increasing or decreasing the power supplied to each pixel.
Apple goes on to explain that dimming values must be extracted from image data on a system, and that data must then be converted to an analog OLED pixel brightness control signal. This complex method can consume system resources and reduce battery life, and it may also be incompatible with existing LCD brightness control mechanisms, requiring major changes to software that already drives LCD screens.
Apple's proposed solutions aim to offer "efficient brightness control" with OLED screens. One described method would take image data and transform it into a "logarithmic domain," from which a "dimming control value" could be subtracted.
"This resulting log-encoded dimmed image data may represent a darker version of the originally received image data," the filing reads. "Thereafter, a pixel of the organic light emitting diode display may be driven based at least in part on the dimmed image data."
In Apple's method, image data could be converted in the data driver of an integrated circuit connected to the OLED screen. This data would be converted from a "framebuffer encoding" gamma-corrected color space to a logarithmic value.
"From this logarithmic value, a digital dimming control value may be subtracted rather than divided," the filing states. "This dimmed logarithmic image data may be converted directly to an analog OLED pixel brightness control signal, without first being converted to a linear digital value, via a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) programmed to convert the logarithmic digital image data to the OLED pixel brightness control signal."
Apple's solution would enable simplified dimming of OLED, and would convert the data associated with adjusting brightness from digital to analog. But Apple's method would do so with fewer bits, and would be less taxing on a mobile device like an iPhone, iPad, or MacBook.
The illustrations accompanying the application specifically show a MacBook Pro as a potential device that could utilize an OLED screen, although the filing notes that Apple's method of controlling OLED brightness could be used on any device, from smartphones to television sets.
Apple has shown continued interest in OLED screens through patent filings, with one proposed invention discovered by AppleInsider last year that aimed to improve power efficiency of OLED screens. However, some industry watchers have said that OLED technology, and the production of OLED screens, are not yet mature enough to meet Apple's standards and requirements.
The latest OLED filing, published this week by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, was originally submitted in October of 2010. It is credited to Ulrich T. Barnhoefer and Lee Yongman.
One of the key advantages of OLED is that, unlike LCD, it does not employ a backlight to illuminate the screen. While this can lead to superior picture quality and improved battery life, it can also make adjusting the brightness of the screen more difficult, Apple notes in a newly published patent application discovered by AppleInsider.
The filing, entitled "OLED Driving Technique," explains that traditional LCD brightness is adjusted by simply increasing or decreasing the amount of light emitted by a backlight. But that's not possible with an OLED display, as each pixel on an OLED screen emits light individually.
That means device makers must adjust the amount of power supplied to each OLED pixel, making it a far more complex endeavor to adjust brightness than an LCD display with a dedicated backlight.
"While increasing or decreasing the amount of power may increase or decrease the amount of light emitted by each OLED, the precise amount of light emitted by each OLED may vary according to nonlinear function," Apple's filing reads. "As such, many techniques for adjusting the brightness of OLED screens have conventionally involved performing complex calculations on image data to ensure that when a brightness-adjusted image id displayed on the OLED display, each pixel displays a proper color and brightness."
In other words, the amount of light output by an individual OLED pixel varies nonlinearly with the amount of power supplied to the OLED pixel. As a result, increasing or decreasing the brightness does not directly correlate to simply increasing or decreasing the power supplied to each pixel.
Apple goes on to explain that dimming values must be extracted from image data on a system, and that data must then be converted to an analog OLED pixel brightness control signal. This complex method can consume system resources and reduce battery life, and it may also be incompatible with existing LCD brightness control mechanisms, requiring major changes to software that already drives LCD screens.
Apple's proposed solutions aim to offer "efficient brightness control" with OLED screens. One described method would take image data and transform it into a "logarithmic domain," from which a "dimming control value" could be subtracted.
"This resulting log-encoded dimmed image data may represent a darker version of the originally received image data," the filing reads. "Thereafter, a pixel of the organic light emitting diode display may be driven based at least in part on the dimmed image data."
In Apple's method, image data could be converted in the data driver of an integrated circuit connected to the OLED screen. This data would be converted from a "framebuffer encoding" gamma-corrected color space to a logarithmic value.
"From this logarithmic value, a digital dimming control value may be subtracted rather than divided," the filing states. "This dimmed logarithmic image data may be converted directly to an analog OLED pixel brightness control signal, without first being converted to a linear digital value, via a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) programmed to convert the logarithmic digital image data to the OLED pixel brightness control signal."
Apple's solution would enable simplified dimming of OLED, and would convert the data associated with adjusting brightness from digital to analog. But Apple's method would do so with fewer bits, and would be less taxing on a mobile device like an iPhone, iPad, or MacBook.
The illustrations accompanying the application specifically show a MacBook Pro as a potential device that could utilize an OLED screen, although the filing notes that Apple's method of controlling OLED brightness could be used on any device, from smartphones to television sets.
Apple has shown continued interest in OLED screens through patent filings, with one proposed invention discovered by AppleInsider last year that aimed to improve power efficiency of OLED screens. However, some industry watchers have said that OLED technology, and the production of OLED screens, are not yet mature enough to meet Apple's standards and requirements.
The latest OLED filing, published this week by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, was originally submitted in October of 2010. It is credited to Ulrich T. Barnhoefer and Lee Yongman.
Comments
they did not figure this out?...
what is the deal with samsung et al.
i mean really...
Apple makes a prototype and they are the only one who realize that it requires a logarthic function to CORRECTLY adjust the brightness?...
when you add two logarthmic values they create a mulitpled value (in effect)
and when you subtract two logarthmic values they divide... ( in effect)
decibels are a logarthmic function...
in the Walter Isaacson book, Steve Jobs refers to second and third rate people/engineers as "bozos"... samsung missing this is the mark of a BOZO...
so a brightness control on OLEDs is a detail that Samsung missed... so if "god is in the details". then Samsung a bit more "godless" than Apple... how interesting that the iPhone was called a "Jesus phone!"
Samsung makes the awesome screen for the new iPad, so they know something... (not only that, but they make alot of other things)
Samsung is coming out with big screen OLED TVs this year. You honestly think there won't be a way for brightness controls?
Samsung probably has a table if brightness values that they look up, before adjusting the Brightness. (so they dont use a math function, just a look-up table)
though... speaking of OLED TV's want to bet on the fact the iPanel ( or the Apple HDTV) is a OLED screen... why else would they need a proper method of adjusting the brightness?.
now an OLED screen HDTV from Apple would make sense... it would be a first!
Quote:
Originally Posted by haar
Samsung probably has a table if brightness values that they look up, before adjusting the Brightness. (so they dont use a math function, just a look-up table) though...speaking of OLED TV's want to bet on the fact the iPanel ( or the Apple HDTV) is a OLED screen... why else would they need a proper method of adjusting the brightness?. now an OLED screen HDTV from Apple would make sense... it would be a first!
You make it seem like you have to jump thru hoops to change the sorry ass brightness level.
But at least you admit, OLED is superior to that IGZO crap everyone is harping about LOL.
Just as long as Apple never touches that awful Pentile display tech Samsung et al have been using! Where white becomes a checkerboard and black text strokes turn to ladders... ugh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by haar
Samsung probably has a table if brightness values that they look up, before adjusting the Brightness. (so they dont use a math function, just a look-up table)
though... speaking of OLED TV's want to bet on the fact the iPanel ( or the Apple HDTV) is a OLED screen... why else would they need a proper method of adjusting the brightness?.
now an OLED screen HDTV from Apple would make sense... it would be a first!
Samsung know more about OLED screens than either you or Apple. Calling them Bozos because they use a different method that obviously works, is puerile on your part.
As for that bet - you would lose. The only companies in the world with the faintest hope of producing large OLED panels are LG and Samsung. The indications are that it's not a matter of:
Quote:
OLED technology, and the production of OLED screens, are not yet mature enough to meet Apple's standards and requirements.
But rather that Samsung don't have the capacity to produce enough panels for themselves, let alone an obstreperous competitor that keeps using courts to try and limit their growth and to stymie competition.
When Samsung introduced the Wave 2 phone, instead of giving it an OLED screen like the original Wave, they actually stepped back in tech and gave it an LCD. The reason they did that was because they wanted to devote all their OLED production capacity to their flagship models like the Galaxys. It doesn't matter how much Apple might have wanted to use OLED screens, Samsung aren't about to let them have them.
So there is less than no chance Samsung is going to make large OLED panels for Apple before they have even made them for their own products. I have seen no indication LG has a hope of making large OLED panels in volumes that would satisfy Apple. Samsung are the current masters of OLED technology. Apple will only get scraps from the table at best.
Samsung are bozos, but I think that they know how to do basic math. If Samsung will make more money manufacturing displays for Apple than for its own product line, Apple won't get table scraps.
Actually there is already a news report out that says Sony is in line to buy OLEDs from Samsung. So Apple would have to wait unless Samsung can ramp up the production levels. But then again these things are going to be expensive so not as many units will be moved, so there is a chance that Samsung will be able to throw Apple some scraps.
Consider that it would only take 6 months or so to add capacity for major orders there is no demand.
Supply is certainly there otherwise there would certainly have been no Sony Vita.