Suppliers gearing up for launch of Apple's new MacBooks in June - report

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 26
    myapplelovemyapplelove Posts: 1,515member


    I can't wait for this retina baby to come out, it's been a while since I was that excited about an apple product, I can even handle mountain lion for it, but of course I ll throw at least 16gbs of ram at it and hope safari doesn't leak to more than 6gbs, lol. I ll even buy it with no ethernet, although a big eff you apple is warranted for this.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 26
    hmmhmm Posts: 3,405member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mcarling View Post


    It's not in Apple's interest to make it more attractive for 3rd party device manufactures to get behind USB3 because that would reduce the demand for Thunderbolt devices.  My guess is that Apple will not disable USB3 in hardware, but will not make USB3 drivers available in 10.8 unless there is an overwhelming customer outcry for it.  I expect Apple's response to be something like: "Thunderbolt is better than USB3, therefore we are supporting Thunderbolt.  If you don't need the awesome speed of Thunderbolt or you have legacy USB3 hardware, you can use USB3 devices at USB2 speeds."


     



    Release it without a driver stack just to push thunderbolt.. really?  The two really don't compete. Thunderbolt is just piggybacking some of the PCI functionality onto the back of the displayport connection. It's not an either or at all, and it never made a viable replacement. Even intel doesn't expect it to drop low enough in cost to replace usb on things like mice, keyboards, and thumb drives. Previously they've stated that it's about how much bandwidth people are willing to pay for. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 26
    winterwinter Posts: 1,238member


    Three USB ports is pushing it if they intend to slim down the form factor. It's certainly possible though.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 26
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Winter View Post

    Three USB ports is pushing it if they intend to slim down the form factor. It's certainly possible though.


     


    Only on the 17", unless they think they can get away with dropping FireWire 800.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 26
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    winter wrote: »
    Three USB ports is pushing it if they intend to slim down the form factor. It's certainly possible though.

    Only on the 17", unless they think they can get away with dropping FireWire 800.

    Perhaps i'm missing a core part of this conversation but I don't see what thinness has to do with the number of USB ports. So long as it's thick enough to support one USB-A port they can support 3. Remember that when the ODD is removed that not only gives Apple engineers back a great deal of internal space but also gives back over 5" of port-side space they can use for ports.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 26
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    winter wrote: »
    Three USB ports is pushing it if they intend to slim down the form factor. It's certainly possible though.

    Three on a 15" or 17" MBP should be a snap! He'll they could add another TB port too. Granted I'm really hoping FireWire dies with this round of updates and I expect the optical to go the way of the dodo. Even if nether of those happened it still should be easy to add a third USB port.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.