To your first paragraph: Apple is going after Samsung because they most blatantly copied Apple's product, even down to how Apple packages their product and the printing on the boxes. It is no secret that Samsung's top management Has been in criminal trouble in South Korea by their own government. Because Google GIVES AWAY the Android OS, they cannot be charged with profiting from Apple's IP. However, since Samsung and HTC and others have profited from selling hardware with Apple's IP included, they are the best targets to sue.
While it's true that Google can not be charged with profiting from Apple's IP, there are still charges that can be filed against them. However, strategically, it makes more sense to go after one or more hardware manufacturers first and then once those cases are established, a case against Google would be easier.
China fosters this kind of environment and its revolting how their court system favors blatant theft.
Can you give a few examples of how China's court system favors blatant theft? While I've heard many things about China, I've never heard that one before.
. I will go out on the limb and say majority of Asia don't like Samsuck.
Is that because they are Korean? I've heard Asians putting down Koreans in the past, calling them a slave race, etc. Why is it that "majority of Asia don't like Samsuck"?
Can you give a few examples of how China's court system favors blatant theft? While I've heard many things about China, I've never heard that one before.
It seems Koh is a little more tech-literate than Posner, and can appreciate what innovation in tech means.
Posner is a biased buffoon using his influence to promote his own position, he should immediately be banned from cases involving patents and his decisions should be reviewed for impartiality.
Comments
While it's true that Google can not be charged with profiting from Apple's IP, there are still charges that can be filed against them. However, strategically, it makes more sense to go after one or more hardware manufacturers first and then once those cases are established, a case against Google would be easier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by docjrey
China fosters this kind of environment and its revolting how their court system favors blatant theft.
Can you give a few examples of how China's court system favors blatant theft? While I've heard many things about China, I've never heard that one before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by docjrey
. I will go out on the limb and say majority of Asia don't like Samsuck.
Is that because they are Korean? I've heard Asians putting down Koreans in the past, calling them a slave race, etc. Why is it that "majority of Asia don't like Samsuck"?
Could AppleInsider post all 49 questions? Great way to ace the job interview at Apple corp, or the Retail stores...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerrySwitched26
Can you give a few examples of how China's court system favors blatant theft? While I've heard many things about China, I've never heard that one before.
the proview case?
Quote:
Originally Posted by haar
the proview case?
That is only one example, and it is questionable.
Are you basing your conclusory statement solely upon that example?
wonder if Koh can be replaced wih Posner.
It seems Koh is a little more tech-literate than Posner, and can appreciate what innovation in tech means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610
It seems Koh is a little more tech-literate than Posner, and can appreciate what innovation in tech means.
Posner is a biased buffoon using his influence to promote his own position, he should immediately be banned from cases involving patents and his decisions should be reviewed for impartiality.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/07/why-there-are-too-many-patents-in-america/259725/
1 share of Apple, on Apple!