Oh, and furthermore, you should read the first article carefully along with Google's response. Google admits that they pay a number of people to comment on their products, but deny having told anyone specifically to comment on this case. So even if Google could say "we have 10,000 paid shills who are supposed to say good things about us, and half of them commented on the case, but we never SPECIFICALLY told them to, so we are not disclosing them" it would meet the judge's requirement for disclosure.
Where does it say in the article that "Google admits that they pay a number of people TO comment on their products"? Now you're just making stuff up....
Conjecture...if apple and google are making mends and setting a a path to cooperation.. It would not be so far fetched to think that this was a givan and take agreement... apple will somhow re-incorporate google maps data in conjunction to their own and allow google to participate in the seatch results along with yelp, expanding googles mobile exposure....in return google drops the suit .. Saves money for both... And solves problems for both!
See the people listed in the supplemental disclosure
In the supplemental disclosure, the list of individuals is preceded with the following:
"Google did not pay for comments from any of the commenters listed in this disclosure. Nor did Google cite or rely on any of these commenters in its briefing in this case."
In the supplemental disclosure, the list of individuals is preceded with the following:
"Google did not pay for comments from any of the commenters listed in this disclosure. Nor did Google cite or rely on any of these commenters in its briefing in this case."
They are, however, on google's payroll, and probably formed the basis for jrgosta's claim.
This is fairly easy to sort out. Either Moto knows they will lose or they aren't certain they have the arguements to win, which is why they asked for the whole no prejudice thing.
They are, however, on google's payroll, and probably formed the basis for jrgosta's claim.
I'm sure the fact that they are on Google's payroll would have an impact on how the individuals comment. However, there is a very big difference between someone who receives money from Google and ALSO comments on the side, and someone who receives money for the sole reason TO comment. The former scenario is reality, but jragosta was implying the later. He has a long history of distorting truths here...
Conjecture...if apple and google are making mends and setting a a path to cooperation.. It would not be so far fetched to think that this was a givan and take agreement...
apple will somhow re-incorporate google maps data in conjunction to their own and allow google to participate in the seatch results along with yelp, expanding googles mobile exposure....in return google drops the suit ..
Saves money for both... And solves problems for both!
Just a thought!
You know? This could work. Not use Google Map data/backend, but incorporate, in addition to Yelp! data, in searches.
Seeing all the usual idiots getting so pissed off over Motorola dropping their case is priceless.
I thought you people weren't supposed to be so emotionally attached to a company? The fact is you're attached to Apple even though you hate them. Your emotional state rises and falls in time with Apple related news. And since most Apple news is good for Apple/bad for competitors it leaves you pathetic individuals in a perpetual state of despair.
Seeing all the usual idiots getting so pissed off over Motorola dropping their case is priceless.
I thought you people weren't supposed to be so emotionally attached to a company? The fact is you're attached to Apple even though you hate them. Your emotional state rises and falls in time with Apple related news. And since most Apple news is good for Apple/bad for competitors it leaves you pathetic individuals in a perpetual state of despair.
The hell are you reading? Most of the reactions here are hopeful that this indicates a settlement, not pissed off over Motorola...
Comments
philboogie 2012/10/02 02:49pm
Perhaps Google used Apple Maps which read: "Dead end"
Apple: "Do you expect me to believe this is a peace offering?"
Google: "No Apple. I expect you to die"
Their filing:
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf3/OraclevGoogle-1237.pdf
Their supplemental disclosure:
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf3/OraclevGoogle-1240.pdf
Claiming that they didn't comply with the court order is just pure dishonest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeeJay2012
This should go in as a Wiki page, on "how it really happened".
Loved the images in your post.
Sorry, this post was in reply to Tallest Skil's earlier brilliant post.
LOL! Hilarious! Thank you sir.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jragosta
Oh, and furthermore, you should read the first article carefully along with Google's response. Google admits that they pay a number of people to comment on their products, but deny having told anyone specifically to comment on this case. So even if Google could say "we have 10,000 paid shills who are supposed to say good things about us, and half of them commented on the case, but we never SPECIFICALLY told them to, so we are not disclosing them" it would meet the judge's requirement for disclosure.
Where does it say in the article that "Google admits that they pay a number of people TO comment on their products"? Now you're just making stuff up....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techstalker
Mueller is the fraud the guy hates google and gets paid by google competitors!
Hopefully this is a good sign or google taking the high road and not being a hypocrite by talking on both sides on their mouth.
There are still the facts of the case being withdrawn to consider, which forms the basis of Mueller's reporting.
So tell us where the bias lies in reproducing court documents?
See the people listed in the supplemental disclosure
apple will somhow re-incorporate google maps data in conjunction to their own and allow google to participate in the seatch results along with yelp, expanding googles mobile exposure....in return google drops the suit ..
Saves money for both... And solves problems for both!
Just a thought!
Quote:
Originally Posted by majjo
See the people listed in the supplemental disclosure
In the supplemental disclosure, the list of individuals is preceded with the following:
"Google did not pay for comments from any of the commenters listed in this disclosure. Nor did Google cite or rely on any of these commenters in its briefing in this case."
They are, however, on google's payroll, and probably formed the basis for jrgosta's claim.
Funniest.
Post.
Ever!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techstalker
Mueller is the fraud the guy hates google and gets paid by google competitors!
Please provide references for your claims
Quote:
Originally Posted by majjo
They are, however, on google's payroll, and probably formed the basis for jrgosta's claim.
I'm sure the fact that they are on Google's payroll would have an impact on how the individuals comment. However, there is a very big difference between someone who receives money from Google and ALSO comments on the side, and someone who receives money for the sole reason TO comment. The former scenario is reality, but jragosta was implying the later. He has a long history of distorting truths here...
You know? This could work. Not use Google Map data/backend, but incorporate, in addition to Yelp! data, in searches.
Hmm....
LOL.
Seeing all the usual idiots getting so pissed off over Motorola dropping their case is priceless.
I thought you people weren't supposed to be so emotionally attached to a company? The fact is you're attached to Apple even though you hate them. Your emotional state rises and falls in time with Apple related news. And since most Apple news is good for Apple/bad for competitors it leaves you pathetic individuals in a perpetual state of despair.
The hell are you reading? Most of the reactions here are hopeful that this indicates a settlement, not pissed off over Motorola...
Since the Motorola Mobility acquisition, Apple is now ready to sue Google directly over Android and FRAND issues.