What you fail to realize is that your not saving $100 by buying a subsidized iPad, your spending more money. Look at the math. Don't fool yourself into believing that because it's $100 less now that your saving $100. Look at the long term price you end up paying. Gesh....now I know how rent-A-centers make money - off the backs of the poor and destitute. You end up paying $3000 for a TV that's only worth $900.
Yes, lets look at the math. Lets say you want to by an iPad with cellular connectivity and will keep it connected to the carrier for 2 years or more. Then why wouldn't you take the deal and save $100?
I could have bought a non-subsidized iPhone and paid month to month for service but I know I will keep it connected every month so it's not cost effective for me to lose that subsidization savings as US carriers don't offer you savings on your plan if you bring your own device.
This has absolutely no barring on whether this option works for your needs or the needs of the masses but wizard69's comment is sound because the math is sound.
The rebate doesn't even cover the cost of the cellular radio feature. Sure, people are free to do what they want but this offer is even more stupid than their phone contract pricing. People who have a phone contract - with any carrier - shouldn't criticize this as fiscally irresponsible ... because so is your phone contract when you get your "subsidized" phone.
The rebate doesn't even cover the cost of the cellular radio feature. Sure, people are free to do what they want but this offer is even more stupid than their phone contract pricing. People who have a phone contract - with any carrier - shouldn't criticize this as fiscally irresponsible ... because so is your phone contract when you get your "subsidized" phone.
Now it's fiscally irresponsible to have a subsidized device over paying full price for an item and still having the same exact bill? The argument that you can cancel at any time is foolish if you have no intention of canceling. I was with AT&T for 5.25 years but you think it would have been more fiscally responsible if I had never had a subsidized phone?
It appears MANY of you are working for big telcos, right? Or, you guys are now having trouble to add, subtract, multiply and divide? Or, many of you are very poor that you can't even buy iPads outright anymore? Are you really addicted to this so called financing? First, it starts with your housing, then your cars, then for taking a second mortgage, then for paying your credit card debts, and then for something that is not so much money to get like electronics and gadgets which actually can be purchased if you are willing to save some money on the side for perhaps one, two months or less. With about one third of US households still under water, I kinda wonder why...
Get smart people! For something that is priced under US 1000, you ought to be able to buy it outright. If not? You are not as smart or financially able as you think you are. You would become just easy killings for the big telcos. To get a financing for something inexpensive that is inherently regressing in values is financially irresponsible and utterly stupid because you lose money from the two fronts simultaneously.
Unfortunately you don't get the plan any cheaper without the tablet/modem/phone, well not in Australia anyway, as a matter of fact month to month plans often give you less for the same money and then you are out for the upfront device cost.
I would like to pay an oil company a monthly fee to use a fixed amount of their petrol/gas for two years in exchange for a car to use it in.
Yes, lets look at the math. ....[snip] but wizard69's comment is sound because the math is sound.
I have frequented some abstract math courses during my days, but, kudos to your telepathic[?] understanding of this abstract "math". As I have yet to experience the "math" this incredibly abstract before, wizard69 is indeed a wizard or must've been a wizard that even someone like SolipsismX can understand the "math" so obfuscated and abstract that wizard69 doesn't even have to expose it to impart its "math", umph.., "calculation".
The only thing I see from this form of "lazy" financing is the big telcos laughing all the way to the bank for lazy people who are too lazy to think. It will cater the same people who love the drive thru for banking, fast food and other stuff just because it is so convenient. You don't have to think about it. It's a no brainer. That's it: a NO BRAINER.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard69
A $100 is a $100 and if you intend to use AT&Ts service anyways it might be a good deal. The qualifier is this; is the device unlocked? If not then no deal.
I was with AT&T for 5.25 years but you think it would have been more fiscally responsible if I had never had a subsidized phone?
I don't think that can be said in general. I know some people never use SMS, never call. The only thing they use is What's App, Facebook and email in order to stay in touch. And they usually do that at home, and out and about, but where there's WiFi. Some folks use a € 10 prepaid SIM for 3 months (!) for that little data access and therefore are far better off with a full paid phone even though they don't switch carriers.
A $100 is a $100 and if you intend to use AT&Ts service anyways it might be a good deal. The qualifier is this; is the device unlocked? If not then no deal.
$100 is not $100.
The qualifier is not if the device is locked vs. unlocked.
Lets walk through this:
1. Firstly your buying into old tech (iPad 3) for $479.99 after instant savings of $100.
2. Assume that you have an AT&T's new "share plan"
3. Baseline price will be $719, an additional $240 over the course of 2 years if you don't go over the 250 MB monthly data usage.
Here is where things get interesting.
If you don't have a new "share plan" or aren't an AT&T customer, to take advantage of the $100 subsidized discount, you will need to add a qualified mobile plan which starts at $15/month for 350 MB, add $10/month for device share. This adds an additional $360 to the $719 which brings your grand total to $1079 to use an iPad 4th generation with 250 MB each month for 2 years.
I would be negligent if I didn't say that a 250 MB plan is meant for very light email usage and minimal browsing (very light). Any streaming apps, an afternoon of browsing, downloading magazines will easily put you over and incur overages.
Most people will tend to use the 3 GB plan which is $30/month which adds an additional $720 to the $719 price of device and 2 year device share @ $10/month - putting the grand total at $1,439.99 (taxes, fees not included).
Even if you plan on using the device with constant LTE service you will not recoup the value of the initial $100 discount.
Here's why. Your locked into a mobile share plan for 2 years! That is the real qualifier. AT&T has designed their plans and the discount to look attractive initially to those who can't afford to spend the initial $$ and obtain the service they desire.
I don't know the price of the iPad 3, but i'm sure the pricing structure will be similar to the iPad 2 a-la iPad 3. Therefore lets assume the standard $100 off the price of the iPad 4 (the same discount last year). Therefore for an iPad 3 16GB + 4G will be $529. If you were to just buy the device for $529, and add a month to month service for the iPad for $30/month ($720 for 2 years) + $529 for an iPad 3 brings the total to $1,249.
Compare buying the iPad outright $1,249 vs. subsidized with the same service $1,439 and you will see $100 does not equal $100. I'm not even going to talk about ROI, depreciation - you will have to do your own cost/benefit analysis for a more in-depth look at acquiring this device.
Seriously though, there is a rule of thumb that my fiance told me when she did her MBA, "...companies sole purpose is to increase revenue. Any offering they provide only seeks to bolster this purpose." It's up to you as the customer to seek the most value for your dollar. Companies will not do it for you. Does help to have a little common sense though.
Edit:
After some thought, I realized this offering by AT&T is very weak and is borderline desperate. Exploiting those who are either less knowledgable or less financially capable of buying the device in full and adding service.
Would've been better marketing and make subsidy more readily understood IF they would've announced you could buy the iPad from them and get FREE (subsidized) upgrade to LTE/4G version ($129 value)!
Just like Apple could've sold iPad mini for $299. And then next year sell the original mini at $249 and the mini w/retina display for $349.
What if the promotion was- pay 14 months @ $10/month on your shared plan- and get 10 months for free.
You guys and your fuzzy math. If you aren't an att customer, then this isn't a good deal- duh. If you are an att customer under their shared plan and you were planning on adding a cellular iPad- it's a no brainer. $100 free.
The problem with all this is that the average person doesn't know how much data it takes to download email, download a book, etc. Secondly, if you have to pay more every time you add a device (shared data plan aside for the moment), people will resist adding devices.
If you're primarily using a Pad as an e-book reader, then WiFi alone is probably enough. But if you're using it for email, web surfing and any kind of texting/social media, then you need a carrier. But the costs are starting to get ridiculous.
Hopefully, if a lot of people go without any plan and simply use WiFi, they'll be pressure on the carriers to come up with better plans, like being able to add an additional device to an unlimited data plan for another $5 to $10 a month at most. But lately they've been going to in the opposite direction. I think the $1000 a year I already pay for my phone plan, plus the $1300 a year I pay to my ISP (including cable TV) is already far too much, even acknowledging that capital investments the carriers much make.
Now it's fiscally irresponsible to have a subsidized device over paying full price for an item and still having the same exact bill? The argument that you can cancel at any time is foolish if you have no intention of canceling. I was with AT&T for 5.25 years but you think it would have been more fiscally responsible if I had never had a subsidized phone?
If you were with AT&T for 5 1/4 years, you absolutely paid more money for the phone and services you got than you could have bought elsewhere - even if you were on the cheapest plan AT&T offers. Even the word "subsidy" is improperly used with what the telcos offer. What they actually offer is for you to finance your device purchase cost. They just happen to hide all of the financials inside their monthly fees over the contract term. It's not hard to do the math equation. I'll even grant you that the phone itself provides no resale value at the end of the term (although an unlocked iPhone has shown itself to hold it's value pretty well).
Now, I will grant you that in the iPad "subsidy" example that if you actually pay the monthly 3G / LTE service for that whole 2 years outside of this AT&T offer then you save a little bit of money. But that's a very specific use case that probably doesn't apply to everyone. In fact, there's absolutely no reason with AT&T's data plan offerings for the iPad to renew the term until you absolutely start using it again. So even if you have a 5-10 day gap between renewals, that easily covers the "subsidy" AT&T is giving to you because you can ultimately have cellular data for a longer total period of time than 24 months.
It's your money, but you can't make a mathematical claim that is easily disproven.
If you were with AT&T for 5 1/4 years, you absolutely paid more money for the phone and services you got than you could have bought elsewhere - even if you were on the cheapest plan AT&T offers. Even the word "subsidy" is improperly used with what the telcos offer. What they actually offer is for you to finance your device purchase cost. They just happen to hide all of the financials inside their monthly fees over the contract term. It's not hard to do the math equation. I'll even grant you that the phone itself provides no resale value at the end of the term (although an unlocked iPhone has shown itself to hold it's value pretty well).
Now, I will grant you that in the iPad "subsidy" example that if you actually pay the monthly 3G / LTE service for that whole 2 years outside of this AT&T offer then you save a little bit of money. But that's a very specific use case that probably doesn't apply to everyone. In fact, there's absolutely no reason with AT&T's data plan offerings for the iPad to renew the term until you absolutely start using it again. So even if you have a 5-10 day gap between renewals, that easily covers the "subsidy" AT&T is giving to you because you can ultimately have cellular data for a longer total period of time than 24 months.
It's your money, but you can't make a mathematical claim that is easily disproven.
Prove it.
Scenario: I have bought an AT&T-compatible
iPhone outright at the full retail price. I need a voice and data plan of at 150 minutes and 2GB per month, respectively. Now which AT&T plan would have saved me wads of cash per year?
I don't think that can be said in general. I know some people never use SMS, never call. The only thing they use is What's App, Facebook and email in order to stay in touch. And they usually do that at home, and out and about, but where there's WiFi. Some folks use a € 10 prepaid SIM for 3 months (!) for that little data access and therefore are far better off with a full paid phone even though they don't switch carriers.
That would be great for those that don't want to make calls if that we're an option (I think TS would love that) but I don't think AT&T will allow a data-only plan on any smartphone.
Even if they did offer that (which you could at least do which you could technically do with MiFi) if you want/need voice and you want/need a certain type of plan because you are a certain type of user then it's axiomatically incorrect to state that any subsidy will cost you more if without the subsidy you plan would still be the same per month.
1 - It's the new iPad (4) (actually, it's any tablet they sell).
2 - Okay, you have the new "share plan".
3 - Baseline price will be $479 & simply add $10 a month.
Since you have the shared plan, the amount of data is the size share plan you have (1, 4, 6, 10, 15, 20GB).
If you have shared data, you don't pay $15 a month for 250MB (and it's not 350MB as you stated 4 times).
1. I don't believe it's the iPad 4. Apple sells the iPad 4 16GB + LTE for $629, there is no way that AT&T is going to undercut Apple by $50, then provide an additional $100 savings for signing a 2 year contract. This is the iPad 3 pricing.
2. If you don't have the new "share plan" you will have to add it, at a cost of $15 / month
3. Price of the iPad 3 ($479) + Device Share $10/month + Data Plan $15/month = $360+$240+$479 = $1079 over the two year contract period. As I stated before.
What if the promotion was- pay 14 months @ $10/month on your shared plan- and get 10 months for free.
You guys and your fuzzy math. If you aren't an att customer, then this isn't a good deal- duh. If you are an att customer under their shared plan and you were planning on adding a cellular iPad- it's a no brainer. $100 free.
Even if you are an AT&T customer it's cheaper to buy the iPad outright, add a month-to-month data plan than it is to use this subsidized model. You save $200+ over the same 2 year period using any plan. And you have the luxury of saving more. There maybe some months where you may not need to have LTE and can choose to shut it off.
If your on contract you don't have the luxury to shut off service.
Come on people. Think.
Edited:
To clarify this is only for those who are not on the new "Shared Data Plans" that AT&T are offering. If you already are on a shared data plan, it is cheaper to take advantage of this subsidized pricing as you will only be paying an additional $10/month to access the same pool of data.
However if you are not, changing to the new shared data plan may result in an increase in your bill. I'm not going to go through the math - it's been prove on Macrumors, Gizmodo, and TUAW - just google it and you will see for yourself. After adding 3 or more devices savings can be appreciated. But initially, there is a price increase.
Comments
Yes, lets look at the math. Lets say you want to by an iPad with cellular connectivity and will keep it connected to the carrier for 2 years or more. Then why wouldn't you take the deal and save $100?
I could have bought a non-subsidized iPhone and paid month to month for service but I know I will keep it connected every month so it's not cost effective for me to lose that subsidization savings as US carriers don't offer you savings on your plan if you bring your own device.
This has absolutely no barring on whether this option works for your needs or the needs of the masses but wizard69's comment is sound because the math is sound.
Now it's fiscally irresponsible to have a subsidized device over paying full price for an item and still having the same exact bill? The argument that you can cancel at any time is foolish if you have no intention of canceling. I was with AT&T for 5.25 years but you think it would have been more fiscally responsible if I had never had a subsidized phone?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fireside
It appears MANY of you are working for big telcos, right? Or, you guys are now having trouble to add, subtract, multiply and divide? Or, many of you are very poor that you can't even buy iPads outright anymore? Are you really addicted to this so called financing? First, it starts with your housing, then your cars, then for taking a second mortgage, then for paying your credit card debts, and then for something that is not so much money to get like electronics and gadgets which actually can be purchased if you are willing to save some money on the side for perhaps one, two months or less. With about one third of US households still under water, I kinda wonder why...
Get smart people! For something that is priced under US 1000, you ought to be able to buy it outright. If not? You are not as smart or financially able as you think you are. You would become just easy killings for the big telcos. To get a financing for something inexpensive that is inherently regressing in values is financially irresponsible and utterly stupid because you lose money from the two fronts simultaneously.
Unfortunately you don't get the plan any cheaper without the tablet/modem/phone, well not in Australia anyway, as a matter of fact month to month plans often give you less for the same money and then you are out for the upfront device cost.
I would like to pay an oil company a monthly fee to use a fixed amount of their petrol/gas for two years in exchange for a car to use it in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
Yes, lets look at the math. ....[snip] but wizard69's comment is sound because the math is sound.
I have frequented some abstract math courses during my days, but, kudos to your telepathic[?] understanding of this abstract "math". As I have yet to experience the "math" this incredibly abstract before, wizard69 is indeed a wizard or must've been a wizard that even someone like SolipsismX can understand the "math" so obfuscated and abstract that wizard69 doesn't even have to expose it to impart its "math", umph.., "calculation".
The only thing I see from this form of "lazy" financing is the big telcos laughing all the way to the bank for lazy people who are too lazy to think. It will cater the same people who love the drive thru for banking, fast food and other stuff just because it is so convenient. You don't have to think about it. It's a no brainer. That's it: a NO BRAINER.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard69
A $100 is a $100 and if you intend to use AT&Ts service anyways it might be a good deal. The qualifier is this; is the device unlocked? If not then no deal.
I don't think that can be said in general. I know some people never use SMS, never call. The only thing they use is What's App, Facebook and email in order to stay in touch. And they usually do that at home, and out and about, but where there's WiFi. Some folks use a € 10 prepaid SIM for 3 months (!) for that little data access and therefore are far better off with a full paid phone even though they don't switch carriers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard69
A $100 is a $100 and if you intend to use AT&Ts service anyways it might be a good deal. The qualifier is this; is the device unlocked? If not then no deal.
$100 is not $100.
The qualifier is not if the device is locked vs. unlocked.
Lets walk through this:
1. Firstly your buying into old tech (iPad 3) for $479.99 after instant savings of $100.
2. Assume that you have an AT&T's new "share plan"
3. Baseline price will be $719, an additional $240 over the course of 2 years if you don't go over the 250 MB monthly data usage.
Here is where things get interesting.
If you don't have a new "share plan" or aren't an AT&T customer, to take advantage of the $100 subsidized discount, you will need to add a qualified mobile plan which starts at $15/month for 350 MB, add $10/month for device share. This adds an additional $360 to the $719 which brings your grand total to $1079 to use an iPad 4th generation with 250 MB each month for 2 years.
I would be negligent if I didn't say that a 250 MB plan is meant for very light email usage and minimal browsing (very light). Any streaming apps, an afternoon of browsing, downloading magazines will easily put you over and incur overages.
Most people will tend to use the 3 GB plan which is $30/month which adds an additional $720 to the $719 price of device and 2 year device share @ $10/month - putting the grand total at $1,439.99 (taxes, fees not included).
Even if you plan on using the device with constant LTE service you will not recoup the value of the initial $100 discount.
Here's why. Your locked into a mobile share plan for 2 years! That is the real qualifier. AT&T has designed their plans and the discount to look attractive initially to those who can't afford to spend the initial $$ and obtain the service they desire.
I don't know the price of the iPad 3, but i'm sure the pricing structure will be similar to the iPad 2 a-la iPad 3. Therefore lets assume the standard $100 off the price of the iPad 4 (the same discount last year). Therefore for an iPad 3 16GB + 4G will be $529. If you were to just buy the device for $529, and add a month to month service for the iPad for $30/month ($720 for 2 years) + $529 for an iPad 3 brings the total to $1,249.
Compare buying the iPad outright $1,249 vs. subsidized with the same service $1,439 and you will see $100 does not equal $100. I'm not even going to talk about ROI, depreciation - you will have to do your own cost/benefit analysis for a more in-depth look at acquiring this device.
Seriously though, there is a rule of thumb that my fiance told me when she did her MBA, "...companies sole purpose is to increase revenue. Any offering they provide only seeks to bolster this purpose." It's up to you as the customer to seek the most value for your dollar. Companies will not do it for you. Does help to have a little common sense though.
Edit:
After some thought, I realized this offering by AT&T is very weak and is borderline desperate. Exploiting those who are either less knowledgable or less financially capable of buying the device in full and adding service.
Edit 2: 250 MB and
Just like Apple could've sold iPad mini for $299. And then next year sell the original mini at $249 and the mini w/retina display for $349.
Quote:
Originally Posted by logandigges
so you are subsidizing $450 for an iPhone, but $100 for an iPad? thats messed up...
Plans start at $10/month. How much would you really expect them to subsidize? I really don't like the subsidy model. I'd prefer lower monthly rates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceweasel
Lets walk through this:
1. Firstly your buying into old tech (iPad 3) for $479.99 after instant savings of $100.
2. Assume that you have an AT&T's new "share plan"
3. Baseline price will be $719, an additional $240 over the course of 2 years if you don't go over the 350 MB monthly data usage.
1 - It's the new iPad (4) (actually, it's any tablet they sell).
2 - Okay, you have the new "share plan".
3 - Baseline price will be $479 & simply add $10 a month.
Since you have the shared plan, the amount of data is the size share plan you have (1, 4, 6, 10, 15, 20GB).
If you have shared data, you don't pay $15 a month for 250MB (and it's not 350MB as you stated 4 times).
I would sign up with a two year data plan that can carry over month over month without hesitation.
Originally Posted by hmm
Plans start at $10/month. How much would you really expect them to subsidize? I really don't like the subsidy model. I'd prefer lower monthly rates.
I'd prefer that or the same prices and unlimited like it should be.
You guys and your fuzzy math. If you aren't an att customer, then this isn't a good deal- duh. If you are an att customer under their shared plan and you were planning on adding a cellular iPad- it's a no brainer. $100 free.
If you're primarily using a Pad as an e-book reader, then WiFi alone is probably enough. But if you're using it for email, web surfing and any kind of texting/social media, then you need a carrier. But the costs are starting to get ridiculous.
Hopefully, if a lot of people go without any plan and simply use WiFi, they'll be pressure on the carriers to come up with better plans, like being able to add an additional device to an unlimited data plan for another $5 to $10 a month at most. But lately they've been going to in the opposite direction. I think the $1000 a year I already pay for my phone plan, plus the $1300 a year I pay to my ISP (including cable TV) is already far too much, even acknowledging that capital investments the carriers much make.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
Now it's fiscally irresponsible to have a subsidized device over paying full price for an item and still having the same exact bill? The argument that you can cancel at any time is foolish if you have no intention of canceling. I was with AT&T for 5.25 years but you think it would have been more fiscally responsible if I had never had a subsidized phone?
If you were with AT&T for 5 1/4 years, you absolutely paid more money for the phone and services you got than you could have bought elsewhere - even if you were on the cheapest plan AT&T offers. Even the word "subsidy" is improperly used with what the telcos offer. What they actually offer is for you to finance your device purchase cost. They just happen to hide all of the financials inside their monthly fees over the contract term. It's not hard to do the math equation. I'll even grant you that the phone itself provides no resale value at the end of the term (although an unlocked iPhone has shown itself to hold it's value pretty well).
Now, I will grant you that in the iPad "subsidy" example that if you actually pay the monthly 3G / LTE service for that whole 2 years outside of this AT&T offer then you save a little bit of money. But that's a very specific use case that probably doesn't apply to everyone. In fact, there's absolutely no reason with AT&T's data plan offerings for the iPad to renew the term until you absolutely start using it again. So even if you have a 5-10 day gap between renewals, that easily covers the "subsidy" AT&T is giving to you because you can ultimately have cellular data for a longer total period of time than 24 months.
It's your money, but you can't make a mathematical claim that is easily disproven.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
I'd prefer that or the same prices and unlimited like it should be.
I could see that too. I don't know what their strategy is here. It's not like they can subsidize it hundreds of dollars on a $240 commitment.
Prove it.
Scenario: I have bought an AT&T-compatible
iPhone outright at the full retail price. I need a voice and data plan of at 150 minutes and 2GB per month, respectively. Now which AT&T plan would have saved me wads of cash per year?
That would be great for those that don't want to make calls if that we're an option (I think TS would love that) but I don't think AT&T will allow a data-only plan on any smartphone.
Even if they did offer that (which you could at least do which you could technically do with MiFi) if you want/need voice and you want/need a certain type of plan because you are a certain type of user then it's axiomatically incorrect to state that any subsidy will cost you more if without the subsidy you plan would still be the same per month.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_CA
1 - It's the new iPad (4) (actually, it's any tablet they sell).
2 - Okay, you have the new "share plan".
3 - Baseline price will be $479 & simply add $10 a month.
Since you have the shared plan, the amount of data is the size share plan you have (1, 4, 6, 10, 15, 20GB).
If you have shared data, you don't pay $15 a month for 250MB (and it's not 350MB as you stated 4 times).
1. I don't believe it's the iPad 4. Apple sells the iPad 4 16GB + LTE for $629, there is no way that AT&T is going to undercut Apple by $50, then provide an additional $100 savings for signing a 2 year contract. This is the iPad 3 pricing.
2. If you don't have the new "share plan" you will have to add it, at a cost of $15 / month
3. Price of the iPad 3 ($479) + Device Share $10/month + Data Plan $15/month = $360+$240+$479 = $1079 over the two year contract period. As I stated before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andysol
What if the promotion was- pay 14 months @ $10/month on your shared plan- and get 10 months for free.
You guys and your fuzzy math. If you aren't an att customer, then this isn't a good deal- duh. If you are an att customer under their shared plan and you were planning on adding a cellular iPad- it's a no brainer. $100 free.
Even if you are an AT&T customer it's cheaper to buy the iPad outright, add a month-to-month data plan than it is to use this subsidized model. You save $200+ over the same 2 year period using any plan. And you have the luxury of saving more. There maybe some months where you may not need to have LTE and can choose to shut it off.
If your on contract you don't have the luxury to shut off service.
Come on people. Think.
Edited:
To clarify this is only for those who are not on the new "Shared Data Plans" that AT&T are offering. If you already are on a shared data plan, it is cheaper to take advantage of this subsidized pricing as you will only be paying an additional $10/month to access the same pool of data.
However if you are not, changing to the new shared data plan may result in an increase in your bill. I'm not going to go through the math - it's been prove on Macrumors, Gizmodo, and TUAW - just google it and you will see for yourself. After adding 3 or more devices savings can be appreciated. But initially, there is a price increase.
Edited:
Removed potentially offensive remark. Apologies.