Courts may base their findings on legal grounds or facts at point, but we know what samescum's intentions were, its what they've been doing for decades ...
intent is the "state of one's mind at the time one carries out an action". whether the intent resulted in identical implementation(s) is what's being argued in courts. in this particular context, a Dutch court did not find Samsung to be infringing on Apple's design patents.
intent is the "s<span style="font-family:Arial;line-height:normal;">tate of one's mind at the time one carries out an action". whether the intent resulted in identical implementation(s) is what's being argued in courts. in this particular context, a Dutch court did not find Samsung to be infringing on Apple's design patents.</span>
Courts are fallible. Plenty of people have been executed who were subsequently found innocent. A court will never know the true intent of what they were planning. If one email is enough to show what they were thinking, imagine all the evidence that isn't known that would be damning for them. Truth? Is it really known by anyone? As I said. Samescum have been renowned for this type of behavior. Just because an accused hasn't the prof, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Comments
And exactly in what facts has kdarling lied in this thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kr00
Yes, we all know what they were thinking, "lets copy Apple".
You only need to look here.
Courts may base their findings on legal grounds or facts at point, but we know what samescum's intentions were, its what they've been doing for decades ...
intent is the "state of one's mind at the time one carries out an action". whether the intent resulted in identical implementation(s) is what's being argued in courts. in this particular context, a Dutch court did not find Samsung to be infringing on Apple's design patents.
Courts are fallible. Plenty of people have been executed who were subsequently found innocent. A court will never know the true intent of what they were planning. If one email is enough to show what they were thinking, imagine all the evidence that isn't known that would be damning for them. Truth? Is it really known by anyone? As I said. Samescum have been renowned for this type of behavior. Just because an accused hasn't the prof, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
http://www.nu.nl/gadgets/3488754/hoge-raad-geeft-samsung-gelijk-in-rechtszaak-apple.html
Not the first time either. . .;)