Apple to pay $53M settlement in iPhone, iPod touch warranty class action suit

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 26
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    hill60 wrote: »
    Maybe KIES doesn't let you do a DFU restore like iTunes can do with iOS devices.

    It's little things that expose the imitations from the real thing.

    It does but what if the connector port is broken?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 26
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    Originally Posted by dasanman69 View Post

    It does but what if the connector port is broken?


     


    Can't we Wi-Fi DFU yet?




    Ah, no, s'pose not. That's silly. Can't we Wi-Fi restore yet?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 26
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    Can't we Wi-Fi DFU yet?


    Ah, no, s'pose not. That's silly. Can't we Wi-Fi restore yet?

    Nor do I think it's possible.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 26
    freerangefreerange Posts: 1,597member
    anonymouse wrote: »
    I always thought they were overrating the reliability of these indicators. I also always wondered if they would turn white again by heating them, like lab desiccants that turn pink and you just heat them up to dry them out till they turn blue again, which indicates they are dry. 
    This is just stupid. The company that should be sued is 3M - they are the ones that manufactured the indicator and sold it for the purpose of indicating if the device was dropped in water! And they knew what Apple was going to use them for yet continued to provide a defective product. Apple should now file a claim against them.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 26
    hmmhmm Posts: 3,405member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by FreeRange View Post





    This is just stupid. The company that should be sued is 3M - they are the ones that manufactured the indicator and sold it for the purpose of indicating if the device was dropped in water! And they knew what Apple was going to use them for yet continued to provide a defective product. Apple should now file a claim against them.




    That is a complete misconception. When you buy an oem product, you buy the product with dictated warranty terms. AFAIK you don't have a method of recourse with each individual company that makes whatever component. I can't find any counter examples where it isn't explicitly dictated. Apple may have details in their own contracts, but you aren't on to anything here. Ram and hard drives would be good examples. The same stuff is sold after market with manufacturer warranties of 3 or more years, yet the components inside your Mac are not covered by these warranties as they are oem parts. Your warranty at that point is through Apple. When it comes to parts like sensors, they have to do whatever testing. If anyone has a claim against 3M, it would be Apple, as you pointed out in the last line of your statement. Even then you really don't know that Apple was lied to regarding their accuracy. It could have been sold on the basis of being used as a warning sign, like if one of these is tripped, investigate further for signs of water damage. You don't know really anything about the claimed product tolerance. 3M probably didn't even know their exact purpose in the final device.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 26
    ipenipen Posts: 410member
    Yeah, my friend was screwed due to this policy but I think he may get some of his money back for repairing. Apple really need to make a waterproofed or at least waterresist iphone 5S.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.