Judge orders Google to hand over search documents in Samsung patent case

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 30
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by dasanman69 View Post





    Well at least youtube works great, and it only cost them $1.65 billion.


     


    Here's to choice.

  • Reply 22 of 30
    gazoobeegazoobee Posts: 3,754member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by hill60 View Post


    ...


     


    Edit:-


     


    Derail imminent.



     


    WTF?!?


     


    Ancient song paired with semi-ancient, completely unrelated video???? 


     


    Is this supposed to show that YouTube sucks technically or something? (it doesn't)


     


    Whatever you are trying to say here, it didn't come across.  Possibly because the newest reference is over 40 years old.  

  • Reply 23 of 30
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Gazoobee View Post


    WTF?!?


     


    Ancient song paired with semi-ancient, completely unrelated video???? 


     


    Is this supposed to show that YouTube sucks technically or something? (it doesn't)


     


    Whatever you are trying to say here, it didn't come across.  Possibly because the newest reference is over 40 years old.  



     


    There was a rather good connection.


     


    It was subtle, but it was there.


     


    You're not going to cry, are you?


     


    image

  • Reply 24 of 30
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Gazoobee View Post


     


    WTF?!?


     


    Ancient song paired with semi-ancient, completely unrelated video???? 


     


    Is this supposed to show that YouTube sucks technically or something? (it doesn't)


     


    Whatever you are trying to say here, it didn't come across.  Possibly because the newest reference is over 40 years old.  



     


    Where is that file hosted?


     


    Hint:- its no longer Youtube.


     


    That and googlies is a slang term for testicles and that would be NSFW, so I had to make do with non-youtube hosted Goodies.

  • Reply 25 of 30
    fotoformatfotoformat Posts: 302member


    "Google, a pioneer in searching the Internet, is arguing that it would be unduly burdened by producing a list of how it searched its own files..."


     


    Perhaps they should have used DuckDuckGo or Bing!

  • Reply 26 of 30
    kdarlingkdarling Posts: 1,640member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post



    The court cannot help but note the irony that Google, a pioneer in searching the Internet, is arguing that it would be unduly burdened by producing a list of how it searched its own files, Judge Grewal wrote in the order.


     


    Ha.  He needs to get out into business more often.


     


    "The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services.


     


    It's usually harder to get telecom services working for a telecom, to get computers working for a computer maker, or probably search old documents at a place known for search.


     


    Managers rarely spend the time or money to provide for their own, as much as for customers!

  • Reply 27 of 30
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by KDarling View Post


     


    Ha.  He needs to get out into business more often.


     


    "The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services.


     


    It's usually harder to get telecom services working for a telecom, to get computers working for a computer maker, or probably search old documents at a place known for search.


     


    Managers rarely spend the time or money to provide for their own, as much as for customers!



     


    So Google is sh*t for search then?


     


    Thanks for the tip, I'm switching to Bing.

  • Reply 28 of 30
    kdarlingkdarling Posts: 1,640member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by hill60 View Post


    So Google is sh*t for search then?


     


    Thanks for the tip, I'm switching to Bing.



     


    Silly comment.  The same concept would apply to Microsoft, of course.


     


    It's the whole point of the saying.   Those who sell a service, often do not have access to their own product as easily as a customer.

  • Reply 29 of 30
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by KDarling View Post


     


    Silly comment.  The same concept would apply to Microsoft, of course.


     


    It's the whole point of the saying.   Those who sell a service, often do not have access to their own product as easily as a customer.



     


    Google are incompetent, I'm switching to Bing.

  • Reply 30 of 30
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    kdarling wrote: »
    Ha.  He needs to get out into business more often.

    "The cobbler's children have no shoes", is a saying that applies a lot to companies who provide products and services.

    It's usually harder to get telecom services working for a telecom, to get computers working for a computer maker, or probably search old documents at a place known for search.

    Managers rarely spend the time or money to provide for their own, as much as for customers!

    You're quite right, I work for a telecom and the phones are always down.
Sign In or Register to comment.