Where is the novelty here? There are publications available which describe similar implementations. Those are dated back to 2002. There is no way, apple can obtain a patent on it.
Where is the novelty here? There are publications available which describe similar implementations. Those are dated back to 2002. There is no way, apple can obtain a patent on it.
Comments
Originally Posted by abpor10
Where is the novelty here? There are publications available which describe similar implementations. Those are dated back to 2002. There is no way, apple can obtain a patent on it.
Obviously that's wrong.