Rumor: Updated MacBook Pros to arrive in late Oct., new Mac Pro in mid Nov.

1356

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 120
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by aaarrrgggh View Post



    Odd timing for the Pro. Most businesses don't spend much money on IT between November and early February due to their budget cycles. Small shops might for tax reasons, but it seems to be sub-optimal.



    Still holding out hope that it will come in at $2k in order to try and expand its market appeal; the market for a "tower" has dropped a lot since the G5 enclosure debuted.

    1) it was preannounced in June to be a 2013 delivery, so the timing of your timing comment is odd;-)

    2) 'most businesses' don't use a Mac Pro as a desktops...  this is a niche product in a niche market. 

    3) businesses that do use Mac Pros have been keeping $$ in the budget since before June;-)... even large businesses have their 4th quarter spending splurges to make sure they don't make 'too much' money in a particular quarter [less about taxes, and more about keeping expectations in line])

    4) We all want Apple to lower their prices as consumers... but we have to look as 'investors' and think product line placement.

    I do agree, that the 'workstation' market is ripe for a disruption.... and a $1999 highly functional base system would be great

  • Reply 42 of 120

    What about IGZO for new RMBP? We were waiting this update so long... I guess we deserve it

  • Reply 43 of 120
    andysolandysol Posts: 2,506member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by dugbug View Post

     

    Where are the mac mini rumors?  Man I'm starting to worry I won't see a haswell mini in 2013.


    Just curious- what are you expecting out of a Haswell mini vs an Ivy Bridge mini outside of a minor power consumption savings and Wireless AC?  Performance-wise, it will be identical to the 2012 (if the iMac is any indication)- unless you go SSD.

     

    Haswell is the most underwhelming desktop processor "upgrade" that has ever come out.  For Laptops it is arguably the best, but for desktop its inconsequential.

  • Reply 44 of 120
    andysolandysol Posts: 2,506member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lemon Bon Bon. View Post

     

    the iMac used to cost £595 here in the UK.  It now costs £1145 inc VAT. 

     

    'Only Apple.'

     

    Lemon Bon Bon.


    The Mustang used to cost $2,368 here in the US.  It now costs $22,200 not inc TTL.

     

    'Only Ford.'

     

    Andysol.

  • Reply 45 of 120
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Lemon Bon Bon. View Post

     

    Maybe Apple should push the iMac's price up into Mac Pro territory.  Afterall, they're a premium company, right?

     

    Lemon Bon Bon.


     

    Well a topped out iMac is current 2800BP(with VAT) or $4500USD before state sales taxes.

    It's in Mac Pro territory.

     

    and really, I think that's what Apple wants (or it thinks it's largest set of High End consumers want).   

  • Reply 46 of 120
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by TheOtherGeoff View Post

     

     

    Well a topped out iMac is current 2800BP(with VAT) or $4500USD before state sales taxes.

    It's in Mac Pro territory.

     

    and really, I think that's what Apple wants (or it thinks it's largest set of High End consumers want).   


    We are budgeting $10k for each of our Mac Pros. That is in line with the near topped out previous Pro prices. $2500 will get you a nice home computer, but most of us spend much more.

  • Reply 47 of 120
    dugbugdugbug Posts: 283member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Andysol View Post

     

    Just curious- what are you expecting out of a Haswell mini vs an Ivy Bridge mini outside of a minor power consumption savings and Wireless AC?  Performance-wise, it will be identical to the 2012 (if the iMac is any indication)- unless you go SSD.

     

    Haswell is the most underwhelming desktop processor "upgrade" that has ever come out.  For Laptops it is arguably the best, but for desktop its inconsequential.


     

    I expect a much improved GPU.   And finally, the new wireless system.

  • Reply 48 of 120
    jexusjexus Posts: 373member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Proximityeffect View Post

     

    We are budgeting $10k for each of our Mac Pros. That is in line with the near topped out previous Pro prices.


    Pretty much what I was thinking.

    Intel's latest IB 12 core Xeons are nearly 3k each, and even the lower end firepros(that are worth anything in performance anyway) will add nearly $1000-$1500 for the cost, never mind the higher end options.

     

    Edit: Can't forget, that PCIe Flash especially does not come cheap either.

  • Reply 49 of 120
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,912member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Lemon Bon Bon. View Post

     

    ...and if you want the DVD (which used to be included...IN the price...) you have to pay £60+ extra.

     

    Don't be stingy, Apple...put an external in the box.

     

    Apple.  Overpriced for what you get.

     

    Lemon Bon Bon.


     

    Should we send you a box is tissues because Apple releases something you can't afford? Go buy your 200£ Dell then and if that makes you happy then so be it. 

  • Reply 50 of 120
    andysolandysol Posts: 2,506member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by dugbug View Post

     

     

    I expect a much improved GPU.   And finally, the new wireless system.


    Oh ya- duh! Forgot about the Intel 5000 and that the mini is integrated.  Sorry!

  • Reply 51 of 120
    nhtnht Posts: 4,522member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Lemon Bon Bon. View Post

     

    Just trash the iMac and the mini.

     

    One Pro Can.  Fill it with your specs.  Done.  One studio monitor.  One can with your 'part susan' specs.


     

    Not likely.  And frankly I prefer they not do that unless the mac pro is as inexpensive as the mini. Since that isn't going to happen this would be a loss for everyone.  Plus the Mac Pro is too huge to use as a HTPC.

     

    Quote:


     

    But no...they'd rather charge £500 for a computer with no keyboard, mouse or monitor.  Or £2045 inc VAT for an out of date and mediocre quad core with crap gpu and no monitor...or push up the prices of their AIO.

     

    Lemon Bon Bon.



     

    Mac Mini 2.5 Ghz i5 (dual core) 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD - £463

     

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Apple-Dual-Core-2-5GHz-Processor-Graphics/dp/B009XCJ4QM/ref=sr_1_1?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1381850765&sr=1-1&keywords=Mac+Mini

     

    Intel NUC 1.8 Ghz i5 (dual core) Barebones with Win8 - £319

     

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Intel-BOXDC53427HYE-Desktop-PC-Integrated/dp/B00C9KMNUO/ref=sr_1_3?s=computers&ie=UTF8&qid=1381850712&sr=1-3&keywords=Intel+NUC#productDetails

     

    No keyboard, mouse, monitor, ram, hdd, or power cord.  For a £144 more I'd rather have OSX and a mini.

     

    So bugger off to Win8 land if you think Apple pricing is so extortionate.  You've been whinging on AI for years.

  • Reply 52 of 120
    nhtnht Posts: 4,522member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Andysol View Post

     

    Oh ya- duh! Forgot about the Intel 5000 and that the mini is integrated.  Sorry!


     

    Yah, that's a huge improvement.   Even if it doesn't get the Iris Pro it'll be better.

  • Reply 53 of 120
    frank777frank777 Posts: 5,839member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by aaarrrgggh View Post



    Still holding out hope that it will come in at $2k in order to try and expand its market appeal; the market for a "tower" has dropped a lot since the G5 enclosure debuted.

     

    The key thing about the pricing is how much Apple accountants estimate they will save on shipping.

     

    Assuming that the U.S. robots build them as cheaply as China would, Apple saves on shipping both because of the distance-to-market, and because of the new smaller form factor.

     

    Whether that savings is as high as $500 is anyone's guess, but I think that would be pushing it.

  • Reply 54 of 120
    19831983 Posts: 1,225member
    I'm still hoping for a Mac mini redesign (A shrunken like version of the new Mac Pro in iPod Touch anodized colours) and Aperture X. But I suspect both are unlikely to happen.
  • Reply 55 of 120
    jexus wrote: »
    Can't forget, that PCIe Flash especially does not come cheap either.

    Not expensive either, really:

    240GB $460
    480GB $720
    960GB $1294

    http://eshop.macsales.com/search/pcie+ssd
  • Reply 56 of 120
    dysamoriadysamoria Posts: 3,430member
    512ke wrote: »
    Apple may be releasing the Mac Pro.

    I'll say what few here seem to be saying.

    Yay. Hurray. Good news. Woooo hooooo.

    You'd think on an Apple news site there would be joy lol.

    It's anxious anticipation for me. I only have $2500 to spend on a machine to replace my evil Windows disaster PC and I want it to be a Mac Pro. I'm not too confident that it'll be in that range, and I'm not at all confident that the configuration I'll need will be within that range.

    I'm also hoping Apple announces a retina-style high-PPI desktop display, since I'm still working with an old 21" CRT that wastes a ton of desk space and isn't really that impressive (except for its "better than LCD" contrast ratio). Even if they do release a high-PPI display, it'll probably be another $1000+ expense I cannot afford.

    I'm fed up with the Windows insanity I've suffered since 1992. My transition to Mac for audio and photography won't be complete without a desktop powered machine. Especially since my 15" MacBook Pro 3,1 now has a dead nvidia GPU.

    You want us to shout with happiness and glee... I'm nervously awaiting the facts that will determine whether or not I'm stuck with what I have for another year (or two). Mac Pro with decent RAM/storage configuration & retina-class-ready output at $2500? I'll be shooting rainbows out my butt.
  • Reply 57 of 120
    macxpress wrote: »
    Wishes he could afford a Mac Pro...I'm very curious as to what the price of this awesome Mac will be. I'm sure it will be through the roof and people will whine and complain like they were going to buy one but now aren't. I'm expecting it to be in the $2500+ range.

    Remember folks...this is a professional workstation. Its not meant to for normal everyday Mac users like most of us.

    Perspective...


    1000  1000

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_128K                                                                                        

    http://www.davemanuel.com/inflation-calculator.php
  • Reply 58 of 120
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,439moderator
    jexus wrote: »
     
    We are budgeting $10k for each of our Mac Pros. That is in line with the near topped out previous Pro prices.
    Pretty much what I was thinking.
    Intel's latest IB 12 core Xeons are nearly 3k each, and even the lower end firepros(that are worth anything in performance anyway) will add nearly $1000-$1500 for the cost, never mind the higher end options.

    Edit: Can't forget, that PCIe Flash especially does not come cheap either.

    The top end model wholesale should be:

    E5-2697v2 12-core $2614
    8GB RAM $100 (I'll leave this at the base because it can be bought cheaper elsewhere)
    dual W9000 (or 2013 equivalent) - this depends on AMD and not the retail prices at all. Since AMD is in bad shape, I reckon they will have got a two for one deal and the retail price of dual W9000 will be ~$3000-4000 so wholesale about $2500
    1TB SSD = $900 ($0.90/GB wholesale)
    the rest of the parts I estimate at $300

    $6400 plus 40% margins = $10,690 and 64GB RAM $800 from a 3rd party so maxed out could be ~$11.5k. The big unknown here is AMD's GPUs as it could make it go as high as $15k but AMD has $359m in assets after deducting liabilities. They made a loss of $74m the last reported quarter. If that keeps up for another 4 quarters or so, they could start to have liabilities that exceed their assets and it doesn't mean immediate bankruptcy but it's the start of it. If Apple sells 250k Mac Pros in the quarter and the average wholesale price they pay AMD between all the GPU options is $800 (the lower end options are always the higher volume so the average comes way down) and AMD has a gross margin of 40%, they'd make $80m profit just from one customer. That alone would counter all their losses and keep them pretty healthy for the next year.
  • Reply 59 of 120
    [SIZE=5][B]Dimension...[/B][/SIZE]


    To Approximate Scale:

    [IMG ALT=""]http://forums.appleinsider.com/content/type/61/id/33436/width/500/height/1000[/IMG]
  • Reply 60 of 120
    <span style="line-height:1.4em;">1. Release of Mavericks</span>
    2. Sufficient supply of the new Intex Xeon chips
    3. Thunderbolt 2- which as far as I know isn't anywhere yet

    Definitely 2 and 3. I doubt 1 is that important to them.

    Mavericks is key to the new Mac Pro -- and I suspect a new set of Mac Pro apps to drop at the same time!
Sign In or Register to comment.