But that doesn't mean a component can't be a product. The chips are produced by Samsung and sold to Apple.
Name a phone, tablet or computer that doesn't have Samsung components inside? They all do, I just won't buy a product with their name on the outside which promotes the company and give them even more of my money. I'm not so upset with their component division over this as I am with their phone/tablet division. They are the ones that copy cat other company's products. And I know that it's a matter of time for apple to start using TSMC for processors and hopefully someone else for panels.
YES, I believe this. They worked their a$$ off and risked everything to get it out ... but not for that idiot f*** Andy Ruben, google and Samsung to copy the shit out of their work.
Name a phone, tablet or computer that doesn't have Samsung components inside? They all do, I just won't buy a product with their name on the outside which promotes the company and give them even more of my money. I'm not so upset with their component division over this as I am with their phone/tablet division. They are the ones that copy cat other company's products. And I know that it's a matter of time for apple to start using TSMC for processors and hopefully someone else for panels.
That's a much more reasonable explanation. I wonder if Samsung's lawyer took a page out of Burger King's book in which they copied the Big Mac and readily admitted it.
That doesn't change the fact that you're helping Samsung's bottom line with every Apple device that you buy.
I'm not helping their phone/tablet division's bottom line if I buy an Apple device. Plus, I don't have Samsung's name on a product promoting the brand when people come to my home or I travel around with a Samsung label on my smart device. It's kind of impossible to get away from buying certain devices with Samsung components inside. Other products i buy may have their components inside, but I don't always know that since we can't always see the guts of the products we purchase,but if the name is on the outside, then I know who benefits the most and in my case it's not going to be Samsung and I don't know why you are dragging out your pathetic attempts to piss me off.
Why don't you just change YOUR discussion away from this. Name a similar product that doesn't use any Samsung components that use Apple's OS's legally. At least Apple has a plan to remove Samsung from their component vendors.
I'm not helping their phone/tablet division's bottom line if I buy an Apple device. Plus, I don't have Samsung's name on a product promoting the brand when people come to my home or I travel around with a Samsung label on my smart device. It's kind of impossible to get away from buying certain devices with Samsung components inside. Other products i buy may have their components inside, but I don't always know that since we can't always see the guts of the products we purchase,but if the name is on the outside, then I know who benefits the most and in my case it's not going to be Samsung and I don't know why you are dragging out your pathetic attempts to piss me off.
Why don't you just change YOUR discussion away from this. Name a similar product that doesn't use any Samsung components that use Apple's OS's legally. At least Apple has a plan to remove Samsung from their component vendors.
That's a much more reasonable explanation. I wonder if Samsung's lawyer took a page out of Burger King's book in which they copied the Big Mac and readily admitted it.
I guess I assumed that everyone knows that practically all smartphones/tablets/computers use Samsung components on some level, whether it's NAND, RAM, SSD, panels, or whatever else they make. My mistake for assuming that people actually know these things.
I'm not exactly keen on Samsung component division as they have been caught TWICE for price fixing. Whether they've done it more than that, but just haven't gotten caught, i don't know. But getting caught price fixing TWICE is a sure indicator that Samsung is NOT a very honest company.
I personally think that Samsung should NOT be allowed to be a component supplier to the computer, tablet, and smartphone industry and make finished goods that compete with their component customer's products as that is conflict of interest. I wonder if Samsung computer/mobile division pay less for the exact same components they sell to other companies. It wouldn't surprise me if they did, which would unfairly bring down the costs of their finished goods.
I guess I assumed that everyone knows that practically all smartphones/tablets/computers use Samsung components on some level, whether it's NAND, RAM, SSD, panels, or whatever else they make. My mistake for assuming that people actually know these things.
I'm not exactly keen on Samsung component division as they have been caught TWICE for price fixing. Whether they've done it more than that, but just haven't gotten caught, i don't know. But getting caught price fixing TWICE is a sure indicator that Samsung is NOT a very honest company.
I personally think that Samsung should NOT be allowed to be a component supplier to the computer, tablet, and smartphone industry and make finished goods that compete with their component customer's products as that is conflict of interest. I wonder if Samsung computer/mobile division pay less for the exact same components they sell to other companies. It wouldn't surprise me if they did, which would unfairly bring down the costs of their finished goods.
I think that you'd have a very short list of who you'd buy products from if you looked into most companies business practices. Try to find one that hasn't done anything unscrupulous.
Comments
Ah, but Samsung components become Apple products once assembled, so his original statement is correct.
Not that you guys are desperately splitting hairs or anything.
But he never claimed he wouldn't help their bottom line, did he?
Do you really think if there had been no Android that there wouldn't have been iPhone clones?
Semantics and self deceiving philosophy.
Name a phone, tablet or computer that doesn't have Samsung components inside? They all do, I just won't buy a product with their name on the outside which promotes the company and give them even more of my money. I'm not so upset with their component division over this as I am with their phone/tablet division. They are the ones that copy cat other company's products. And I know that it's a matter of time for apple to start using TSMC for processors and hopefully someone else for panels.
YES, I believe this. They worked their a$$ off and risked everything to get it out ... but not for that idiot f*** Andy Ruben, google and Samsung to copy the shit out of their work.
It is a terrible habit of yours but what are we going to do?
The sig from asdasd or whatshisname.
"I wanted dsadsa bit it was already taken"
I always feel the need to ask for a correction, but am too lazy to post. Well, maybe he reads this post.
No need for us to do anything, as he can deceive himself.
Actually we all do it and it's healthy for our mental health.
Cool! A double positive!
Are you positive it was positive?
That's a much more reasonable explanation. I wonder if Samsung's lawyer took a page out of Burger King's book in which they copied the Big Mac and readily admitted it.
Positively positive.
I got distracted for a second and didn't realize I wrote health and healthy in the same sentence. Doh!!
That doesn't change the fact that you're helping Samsung's bottom line with every Apple device that you buy.
I'm not helping their phone/tablet division's bottom line if I buy an Apple device. Plus, I don't have Samsung's name on a product promoting the brand when people come to my home or I travel around with a Samsung label on my smart device. It's kind of impossible to get away from buying certain devices with Samsung components inside. Other products i buy may have their components inside, but I don't always know that since we can't always see the guts of the products we purchase,but if the name is on the outside, then I know who benefits the most and in my case it's not going to be Samsung and I don't know why you are dragging out your pathetic attempts to piss me off.
Why don't you just change YOUR discussion away from this. Name a similar product that doesn't use any Samsung components that use Apple's OS's legally. At least Apple has a plan to remove Samsung from their component vendors.
Please go grasp straws elsewhere.
You obviously didn't read my last reply to you.
That's a much more reasonable explanation. I wonder if Samsung's lawyer took a page out of Burger King's book in which they copied the Big Mac and readily admitted it.
I guess I assumed that everyone knows that practically all smartphones/tablets/computers use Samsung components on some level, whether it's NAND, RAM, SSD, panels, or whatever else they make. My mistake for assuming that people actually know these things.
I'm not exactly keen on Samsung component division as they have been caught TWICE for price fixing. Whether they've done it more than that, but just haven't gotten caught, i don't know. But getting caught price fixing TWICE is a sure indicator that Samsung is NOT a very honest company.
I personally think that Samsung should NOT be allowed to be a component supplier to the computer, tablet, and smartphone industry and make finished goods that compete with their component customer's products as that is conflict of interest. I wonder if Samsung computer/mobile division pay less for the exact same components they sell to other companies. It wouldn't surprise me if they did, which would unfairly bring down the costs of their finished goods.
I think that you'd have a very short list of who you'd buy products from if you looked into most companies business practices. Try to find one that hasn't done anything unscrupulous.
LOL!
Plus one