Police arrest copper burglar suspect at Apple's Campus 2 construction site

13

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 66
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by pneyrinck View Post



    This is easily the worst post on AI ever. Please don't post this click bait junk.

    There seems to be a TON of click bait lately. To the point where I'm thinking CNET may now have its hands in AI.

  • Reply 42 of 66
    snovasnova Posts: 1,281member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by stargazerCT View Post

     
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lilgto64 View Post



    The house next to my parents' is vacant and had the copper stolen recently - I think they caught the thieves - at $3 a pound I can't imagine they got more than a couple or few pounds out of a 1200 sq ft house. How desperate do you have to be for $20 or less to break in to a house to steal the plumbing and wiring?

     

    I guess if you have no money and no food, $20 is a lot.


    they have free food in jail.

  • Reply 43 of 66
    "...discovered a 56 year old man from Belmont hiding at the site, whom they attacked with their police dogs for failing to obey orders…"

    Wow. Really?

    OBEY or we release the hounds?

    Over a bit of scrap wire. What is the world coming to (not to mention the pathos inherent in a man having to scrounge for wire to make a few $)...?
  • Reply 44 of 66
    smaffei wrote: »
    It's obvious this guy is a meth addict. People will do anything for the drugs they are addicted to.

    Or maybe a food addict and desperately needing a fix…
  • Reply 45 of 66
    smaffeismaffei Posts: 237member

    If that were the case, then why not steal food? Sure is easier. Copper pipe theft is usually committed by junkies. Accept that they exist is this world. Will ya?

  • Reply 46 of 66
    Cops catch the Copper Caper!
  • Reply 47 of 66
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    applecpa wrote: »
    Cops catch the Copper Caper!

    More like the Copper Copper :lol:
  • Reply 48 of 66
    Originally Posted by AppleCPA View Post

    Cops catch the Copper Caper!

     

    Crack Cupertino Coppers Crack Case of the Copper Caper; Cook Contented.

  • Reply 49 of 66

    I apologise for my trollish-ness and you are quite right about homonyms but these are symbols or glyphs not words – shorthand for something.

     


    The '£' is called a pound sign and there is no other name for it whereas the '#' symbol has several, many of which predate the US usage and computers by many years and that even in US English there is not total consistency of usage. Other than to add 'Sterling' to denote that it is the UK version of the pound that is being referred to – '£' is an ancient glyph for currency based on weight.
     


    As to Aluminium... Its first name was 'Alumium' after Humphrey Davy. 'Aluminium' matches the other Alkaline earth metal denomination and is the first officially recognised IUPAC name based on that logic. 'Aluminum' was later tagged-on as an alternative spelling due to it's common use in the USA.


     


    I applaud the variety and adaptability of English in all its forms, the fact that English speakers overwhelmingly ignore the OED prescription of 'z' is a testimony to this and long may it last...


     


    I just feel that '£' has more weight and value that the hashed-together use of the '#' symbol ;-)

  • Reply 50 of 66
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    igamogam wrote: »
    As to Aluminium... Its first name was 'Alumium' after Humphrey Davy. 'Aluminium' matches the other Alkaline earth metal denomination and is the first officially recognised IUPAC name based on that logic. 'Aluminum' was later tagged-on as an alternative spelling due to it's common use in the USA.

    You have this very backwards. Davy named it alumium in 1808 but then later changed it to aluminum in 1812. It was the Brits, not Davy, that decided to then change it further and after the fact to aluminium. The Brits not liking how aluminum sounds or wanting it to harmonize with other elements does not permit us to rewrite history to suggest the US somehow bastardized the spelling or pronunciation after some pure Brit solution had been discovered. This was Davy and this was before the change in the UK.
  • Reply 51 of 66
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    solipsismx wrote: »
    You have this very backwards. Davy named it alumium in 1808 but then later changed it to aluminum in 1812. It was the Brits, not Davy, that decided to then change it further and after the fact to aluminium. The Brits not liking how aluminum sounds or wanting it to harmonize with other elements does not permit us to rewrite history to suggest the US somehow bastardized the spelling or pronunciation after some pure Brit solution had been discovered. This was Davy and this was before the change in the UK.


    ... "for so we shall take the liberty of writing the word, in preference to aluminum, which has a less classical sound." ...

    I love that quote. So British!

    Thank heavens you Yanks hadn't heard of potassium, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and strontium. ;)

    There again ... Platinium has a certain ring to it ... :D
  • Reply 52 of 66
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    ... "for so we shall take the liberty of writing the word, in preference to aluminum, which has a less classical sound." ...

    I love that quote. So British!

    Thank heavens you Yanks hadn't heard of potassium, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and strontium. ;)

    There again ... Platinium has a certain ring to it ... :D

  • Reply 53 of 66
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    solipsismx wrote: »

    Mr. Bean can talk?!?
  • Reply 54 of 66
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SolipsismX View Post

     
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by igamogam View Post



    As to Aluminium... Its first name was 'Alumium' after Humphrey Davy. 'Aluminium' matches the other Alkaline earth metal denomination and is the first officially recognised IUPAC name based on that logic. 'Aluminum' was later tagged-on as an alternative spelling due to it's common use in the USA.




    You have this very backwards. Davy named it alumium in 1808 but then later changed it to aluminum in 1812. It was the Brits, not Davy, that decided to then change it further and after the fact to aluminium. The Brits not liking how aluminum sounds or wanting it to harmonize with other elements does not permit us to rewrite history to suggest the US somehow bastardized the spelling or pronunciation after some pure Brit solution had been discovered. This was Davy and this was before the change in the UK.

    Hmm... Apart from virtually repeating what I wrote but telling me I'm wrong, Sir Davey actually used Alumium, Aluminum and Aluminium He ended up preferring Aluminium. The latter is the one he and professional chemist settled on as being the correct and logical name – Davey (ds Quartely Rev., VIII, an. 1812, 72, ibid. : "aluminium for so we shall take the liberty of writting [sic] the word, in preference to aluminum" Up until the early part of the 1900s Aluminium was the most used form in the USA and it has been observed that Aluminum is the name used by non-chemists & tradespeople, whereas Chemist tend to say Aluminium

     

    The American Chemical Society exclusively call it Aluminium since 1926 and I have read somewhere years ago that there were more Americans than any other single nationality on the IUPAC committee that chose Aluminium (the IUPAC is Swiss based and I can't find a reference to confirm that).

     

    Besides, Davey was, after all a Brit (specifically an English Briton) and if, after much contemplation, he decided it should be called Aluminium who are we mere mortals to argue?

  • Reply 55 of 66
    solipsismxsolipsismx Posts: 19,566member
    igamogam wrote: »
    Hmm... Apart from virtually repeating what I wrote but telling me I'm wrong...

    I repeated what you virtually wrote in much the same way that 10010001 is virtually the same as 10001001. They aren't the same and anyone suggesting that aluminum is wrong is simply wrong.
  • Reply 56 of 66

    Let's just agree to differ then.

  • Reply 57 of 66
    zoetmb wrote: »
    Not defending this guy, but how much did it cost taxpayers for the police to launch a helicopter and bring the canine unit? Why couldn't they just wait for the guy to come out the gate?

    Would the police have sent a helicopter if this wasn't Apple property?

    Helicopter was probably already airborne "flying its beat." Waiting for him to come out of that massive area would take forever, monopolize officers' time, allow the suspect to arm himself, and increase his chances of escaping. Cops have to get in there before the suspect has a chance to think.
  • Reply 58 of 66
    kibitzerkibitzer Posts: 1,114member
    I'm coming late to the party on this, but I have a couple yarns to spin about copper thieves in the steel industry where I worked. We once caught a guy stealing 250-pound copper tuyeres from the blast furnace department storeroom. Tuyeres are large water-cooled copper nozzles that give meaning to the term blast furnace. They're used to blow huge volumes of superheated air into the bottom of the furnace, which causes coke to burn and smelt pig iron from iron ore. The guy would wheelbarrow the tuyeres over to the fence line and drop them there, to come back with his pickup truck after dark. He made off with about a dozen of these babies over time before he finally got caught.

    On another occasion a fellow was discovered dead after daybreak at the base of a ladder in a vacant building. Investigation indicated that he had been unbolting some copper busbars about 20 feet above ground. He was not an electrician, so the thought that the busbars might be energized apparently had eluded him.

    Scrap thieves can be an innovative bunch, although still not the sharpest knives in the drawer. Last spring, a school bus transportation company in Chicago locked up its yard at the end of the day. The next morning eight of its buses were missing - stolen and driven to a scrap dealer, where they were shredded overnight. A quarter million dollars worth of school buses were obliterated within hours ... almost ... except for some of their GPS units, which apparently survived the shredding. As scrap, it is estimated that each bus would have fetched from $1,500 to $3,500.
  • Reply 59 of 66
    Crack Cupertino Coppers Crack Case of the Copper Caper; Cook Contented.

    Crackdown! Cops Crack Case, Crook Cops Crack! Cook Cracks Jokes!
  • Reply 60 of 66
    igamogam wrote: »
    You mean the "octothorpe" or "number" (#) sign?

    The "£" (pound) character predates the hash sign by several hundred years if not more, whereas the number might be called the pound sign by mistake as it has the same position on American keyboards as the pound sign.

    Yes, but in America we refer to pounds as a measure of weight, not currency. Meanwhile, back in merry olde England "stone" is still used as a measure of weight. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.