Yes, Samsung is getting off easy. But to accuse the judges of making a mockery of the judicial system shows ignorant bias. Try to understand the law and history of such cases before you jump to conclusion. Or perhaps you care more about blind worship than reality?
If you're calling that blind worship, maybe you should take those Rose Tinted Glasses you view the U.S. Judicial system with and consider:
(i) that Samsung is an incredibly corrupt company - it's leaders legal entanglements in it's own country are testimony to that...
AND
(ii) they have the money to throw back handers at anyone 'including' so-called judges, that continually seem to make a mockery of the so-called legal and justice system in America.
No-one is looking at this blindly - apart from yourself!
If you're calling that blind worship, maybe you should take those Rose Tinted Glasses you view the U.S. Judicial system with and consider:
(i) that Samsung is an incredibly corrupt company - it's leaders legal entanglements in it's own country are testimony to that...
AND
(ii) they have the money to throw back handers at anyone 'including' so-called judges, that continually seem to make a mockery of the so-called legal and justice system in America.
No-one is looking at this blindly - apart from yourself!
Are you accusing US judges of taking backhanders from Samsung? That's a very serious accusation. I assume you have evidence to back that up, care to share it?
<div class="quote-container" data-huddler-embed="/t/161823/samsung-avoids-sanctions-in-accidental-apple-nokia-patent-licensing-disclosure#post_2465863" data-huddler-embed-placeholder="false">Quote:<div class="quote-block">Originally Posted by <strong>dogchop99</strong> <a href="/t/161823/samsung-avoids-sanctions-in-accidental-apple-nokia-patent-licensing-disclosure#post_2465863"><img alt="View Post" src="/img/forum/go_quote.gif" /></a><br /> <p> </p><p> </p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)">If you're calling that blind worship, maybe you should take those Rose Tinted Glasses you view the U.S. Judicial system with and consider:</p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)">(i) that Samsung is an incredibly corrupt company - it's leaders legal entanglements in it's own country are testimony to that...</p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)"> </p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)">AND</p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)"> </p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)">(ii) they have the money to throw back handers at anyone 'including' so-called judges, that continually seem to make a mockery of the so-called legal and justice system in America.</p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)"> </p><p style="color:rgb(24, 24, 24)">No-one is looking at this blindly - apart from yourself!</p></div></div><p>Are you accusing US judges of taking backhanders from Samsung? That's a very serious accusation. I assume you have evidence to back that up, care to share it?</p>
of course he hasnt the evidence. Spurious libellous comments are all the evidence he requires. Fact ????
Are you accusing US judges of taking backhanders from Samsung? That's a very serious accusation. I assume you have evidence to back that up, care to share it?
Remember that UK judge who forced Apple to carry an apology to Samsung on their website, what was his name?
Comments
Yes, Samsung is getting off easy. But to accuse the judges of making a mockery of the judicial system shows ignorant bias. Try to understand the law and history of such cases before you jump to conclusion. Or perhaps you care more about blind worship than reality?
If you're calling that blind worship, maybe you should take those Rose Tinted Glasses you view the U.S. Judicial system with and consider:
(i) that Samsung is an incredibly corrupt company - it's leaders legal entanglements in it's own country are testimony to that...
AND
(ii) they have the money to throw back handers at anyone 'including' so-called judges, that continually seem to make a mockery of the so-called legal and justice system in America.
No-one is looking at this blindly - apart from yourself!
If you're calling that blind worship, maybe you should take those Rose Tinted Glasses you view the U.S. Judicial system with and consider:
(i) that Samsung is an incredibly corrupt company - it's leaders legal entanglements in it's own country are testimony to that...
AND
(ii) they have the money to throw back handers at anyone 'including' so-called judges, that continually seem to make a mockery of the so-called legal and justice system in America.
No-one is looking at this blindly - apart from yourself!
Are you accusing US judges of taking backhanders from Samsung? That's a very serious accusation. I assume you have evidence to back that up, care to share it?
Are you accusing US judges of taking backhanders from Samsung? That's a very serious accusation. I assume you have evidence to back that up, care to share it?
Remember that UK judge who forced Apple to carry an apology to Samsung on their website, what was his name?
He went on to work for Samsung in the US.
A nice little earner, as the poms would say.