Samsung appeals final judgment in first Apple v. Samsung California trial, drops asserted SEPs from

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 41
    spacepowerspacepower Posts: 208member
    tooltalk wrote: »
    @Spacepower: No, go back and read Mueller's blog:


    [SIZE=14px]"There's nothing in the stipulation that indicates <em style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-size:16px;line-height:1.4em;">why</em>
     Samsung made this decision, but whatever the reason(s) may be, it's a good thing in my view. Samsung has already prevailed over Apple on SEPs in different jurisdictions (including at the ITC last year, though an import ban was ultimately vetoed). It makes sense for Samsung to focus on non-SEPs at the upcoming trial, and especially on its <a href="http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/03/setback-for-apple-us-judge-denies.html" style="color:rgb(153,153,153);font-size:16px;line-height:1.4em;" target="_blank">proven defensive strength</a>
    ."[/SIZE]

    Further, in the EU, Samsung has only offered not to seek injunctive relief for 5 years and extend the negotiation period to 1 year.  This is far from abandoning SEP based legal strategy altogether. 

    You last issue, this hasn't helped Samsung escape criticism yet.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.