Doesn't this mean Samsung has to keep two separate production lines for the A6X and A5? If they are willing to do this, then it means that Apple is still buying a significant volume of the older processors.
It stuck around this long as Apple had enterprise level buying for them for education, meeting center scheduling, medical applications and point of sale systems - based around the old connector hardwired in to the infrastructure and custom uses. Sure it may seem not a big deal for basic/prosumer use cases, but for others it matters. Going forward I doubt older models will stick around as long now.
Please stop making sense....if it doesn't apply to Apple-blog followers and early adopters, it didn't making any sense.
Comments
Doesn't this mean Samsung has to keep two separate production lines for the A6X and A5? If they are willing to do this, then it means that Apple is still buying a significant volume of the older processors.
It stuck around this long as Apple had enterprise level buying for them for education, meeting center scheduling, medical applications and point of sale systems - based around the old connector hardwired in to the infrastructure and custom uses. Sure it may seem not a big deal for basic/prosumer use cases, but for others it matters. Going forward I doubt older models will stick around as long now.
Please stop making sense....if it doesn't apply to Apple-blog followers and early adopters, it didn't making any sense.