So apple now claim copyrights on someone who recorded them demo of the old HP building they are tearing down...
Did not know you can claim ownership to video of your building being destroyed.
That seems pretty pathetic if they can. I would understand if the song they used wasn't authorized but could Apple get it taken down because of that without owning the rights to the audio?
edit: It turns out it was Apple's video and they apparently didn't give permission for it to be used.
Someone stole the apple video they were doing themselves, that seem to be a different story if it was in fact their video, how did someone get their hands on it if apple had not already posted it themselves. Just remember if you going to steal someone video make sure to do a parity of it since they is protect from a copyright take down order.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX
That seems pretty pathetic if they can. I would understand if the song they used wasn't authorized but could Apple get it taken down because of that without owning the rights to the audio?
edit: It turns out it was Apple's video and they apparently didn't give permission for it to be used.
Someone stole the apple video they were doing themselves, that seem to be a different story if it was in fact their video, how did someone get their hands on it if apple had not already posted it themselves. Just remember if you going to steal someone video make sure to do a parity of it since they is protect from a copyright take down order.
I think parody would only be considered Fair Use if the video had already been released by Apple.
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie
Don't know about the glass specifically, but they do make use of all material according to the project plan:
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie
Don't know about the glass specifically, but they do make use of all material according to the project plan:
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
“ Juvenile, aggressive, misspelled, sexist, homophobic, swinging from raging at the contents of a video to providing a pointlessly detailed description followed by a LOL, YouTube comments are a hotbed of infantile debate and unashamed ignorance – with the occasional burst of wit shining through.
Comments
So apple now claim copyrights on someone who recorded them demo of the old HP building they are tearing down...
Did not know you can claim ownership to video of your building being destroyed.
That seems pretty pathetic if they can. I would understand if the song they used wasn't authorized but could Apple get it taken down because of that without owning the rights to the audio?
edit: It turns out it was Apple's video and they apparently didn't give permission for it to be used.
Someone stole the apple video they were doing themselves, that seem to be a different story if it was in fact their video, how did someone get their hands on it if apple had not already posted it themselves. Just remember if you going to steal someone video make sure to do a parity of it since they is protect from a copyright take down order.
Quote:
That seems pretty pathetic if they can. I would understand if the song they used wasn't authorized but could Apple get it taken down because of that without owning the rights to the audio?
edit: It turns out it was Apple's video and they apparently didn't give permission for it to be used.
I think parody would only be considered Fair Use if the video had already been released by Apple.
Don't know about the glass specifically, but they do make use of all material according to the project plan:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/apple-campus2-project/Project_Description_Submittal7.pdf
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
Don't know about the glass specifically, but they do make use of all material according to the project plan:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/apple-campus2-project/Project_Description_Submittal7.pdf
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
Don't know about the glass specifically, but they do make use of all material according to the project plan:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/apple-campus2-project/Project_Description_Submittal7.pdf
Hard to say with just one post, but I don't think Apple will ever lower themselves to have 'their own YouTube channel'. It's a place filled with ill-....ah, Wiki tells it so much better than me:
“ Juvenile, aggressive, misspelled, sexist, homophobic, swinging from raging at the contents of a video to providing a pointlessly detailed description followed by a LOL, YouTube comments are a hotbed of infantile debate and unashamed ignorance – with the occasional burst of wit shining through.
Sounds like heaven to me. LOL