X.I or 10.1?

Jump to First Reply
cdhostagecdhostage
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
How is it written, officially? Roman numerals all the way, or is Apple's official numbering in the modern Arabic form?

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I think it's 10.1
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 9
    logan calelogan cale Posts: 1,281member
    It's officially "Mac OS X v10.1", AFAIK.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 9
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by MacAgent:

    <strong>It's officially "Mac OS X v10.1", AFAIK.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yeah, that's what I meant. I shouldn't have just put 10.1.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 9
    peperonepeperone Posts: 204member
    To be honest, Mac OS X.I somehow looks ghey
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 9
    zozo Posts: 3,117member
    so... is MacOS X to signal a new operating system? But then why did they start at 10 and not at 1? Will it be MacOS X 11?



    Seeing that Apple insists to pronounce it "TEN" and not "EXX", it would be Mac OS TEN ELEVEN. Duh.



    Or will the call it MacOS XI 11?



    Either way this makes no sense...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 9
    markjomarkjo Posts: 28member
    [quote] so... is MacOS X to signal a new operating system? But then why did they start at 10 and not at 1? Will it be MacOS X 11?

    Seeing that Apple insists to pronounce it "TEN" and not "EXX", it would be Mac OS TEN ELEVEN. Duh.



    Or will the call it MacOS XI 11?



    Either way this makes no sense...

    <hr></blockquote>



    And going from Windows 3.1 to 95 to 98 to Me to XP does?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 9
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Windows XP makes a lot more sense than MacOSX 10.1



    After that there will be Windows.NET and MacOSX 11.



    Umm, riiiight.



    Maybe we'll end up with MacOSX 10.9.9.9.9.9.9.9.9.9.98 in 15 years.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 9
    dogcowdogcow Posts: 713member
    Mac OS X v10.1...

    Mac OS X v10.5...

    Mac OS X v10.9...



    then



    Mac OS 11...

    Mac OS 11.2...

    Mac OS 11.5



    Simple, no?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 9
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by Dogcow:

    <strong>Mac OS X v10.1...

    Mac OS X v10.5...

    Mac OS X v10.9...



    then



    Mac OS 11...

    Mac OS 11.2...

    Mac OS 11.5



    Simple, no?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Yeah, pretty simple and makes sense.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.