I understand that was a damage retrial, not about whether Sammy infringed Apple's IPs. And since then, I think, they appealed the first case.
For any truthful person, the evidence of Samsung's guilt is plain to see. And, of course, that led to their conviction. Subsequent comments in the damages retrial tend to confirm their guilt, Their legal maneuvering (i.e., appealing and such) is not accompanied by any protestation of innocence but comes simply from a desire to minimize the penalties they might face.
Comments
For any truthful person, the evidence of Samsung's guilt is plain to see. And, of course, that led to their conviction. Subsequent comments in the damages retrial tend to confirm their guilt, Their legal maneuvering (i.e., appealing and such) is not accompanied by any protestation of innocence but comes simply from a desire to minimize the penalties they might face.