but...i would rather wear a sensor laden arm band that's flexible and light and out of sight that pushes biometrics to my iphone than a watch that's heavy, visible, and seeks to get my attention by pushing info from my phone to me.
wish apple would work on this instead.
I think that is much closer to a winning product over something that tries to duplicate what a smartphone can do, like current smartwatches.
AppleInsider needs to stop using those fake fantasy product illustrations. They're always ludicrous. You don't know what they look like.
I don't mind AI or anyone else using mockups but these simply aren't good. A perfectly round bracelet that then requires you to slide your finger over it to use makes zero sense. I think AI could help their traffic by paying someone(s) to make a variety of mockups that would be owned by AI with their watermark.
If they can track calorie consumption on a wrist, that will be a MAJOR technical achievement. Almost so major that I think this rumor can't be true. I would love to be surprised though.
So a rumored product has rumored components, a rumored volume manu rate and a rumored release date.
Analysts thinks it's rumored to be more successful than the iPad? Yea, right.
I wonder how the watch band will connect to the actual watch part. Will this just be one seamless type piece or can you disconnect the watch part and therefore allow possible third parties to make bands. I am sure there would be a thriving market for bands in all shapes, sizes, colors, and materials if it can be detached.
I also wonder how adjustable and comfortable the band will be. I have a Breitling watch and it slips and slides a bit on my wrist. And since the watch part is very big and heavy I find myself adjusting it frequently. The problem with taking the band down a notch is that made it uncomfortably tight. Maybe Apple will have a design on size adjustment for the band that allows people to really get a comfortable fit that is tight enough not to slip and slide but not so tight as to pinch.
I would say this rumor is very likely to be true. I remember Apple acquiring iWatch patents all over the world with that shell company a long time back. It also just makes perfect sense as their next product category. This will be yet another affordable, entry type product like the iPod touch to help lock people into the iOS ecosystem.
Can AppleInsider please stick to FACTS please, otherwise what's the point ?
this is a NEWS site, not a best-guess rumor site.
The "Future Apple Hardware" section of the forum is traditionally the place to discuss rumors. The difference is that in the past there were some credible sources, the rumors were actual leaks and the discussions were much more interesting. Remember Think Secret? They had inside info that was often picked up here igniting densely crowded long discussions. Those days are over after Apple shutting down TS and plugging leaking holes, but the focus of this section has not changed because Apple never reveals its plans. Therefore future hardware discussions are closely tied to rumors circulating the web.
1) I don't understand the use of "curved OLED" in the title and "flexible OLED" in the body. I hope AI isn't interchanging this terms as if they are mean the same thing.
2) I don't know how believable this rumour is but I've been saying that OLED is probably the best way to go with the iWatch concept because the display can be almost entire black to conserve power while also showing data on screen, like a simple and elegant watch face or text, and because the black will be very deep, not just a near-black dark-grey, thereby helping it look more jewelry-like.
Agreed the two shouldn't be confused. You can use flexible oled displays without it actually being curved. Though if it is indeed curved that could mean it won't be a round dial. A round watch doesn't necessarily need a curve and would I suspect give a rather weird convex effect. If curved I suspect it being curved in order to have a better fit for a rectangular or square face.
Yep, oled is definitely the way to go. Not only does it not use a backlight it also allows for individual pixels to be turned on while the others are completely off. The Moto X's Active Display uses this, and is rumored to be included in the Moto 360 as well.
A wearable device is more of a subjective "thing" than a phone. All phones are generally flat, rectangular, and remain in your pocket until needed. A watch, much more visible, is even more prone to aesthetic likes and dislikes. As much as an Apple fan as I am, if the iWatch turns out to be a glorified Fuelband or a techy bracelet like all the concept pics, it won't fit my personal tastes. I would prefer something elegant, classy, not over-the-top geeky but still fully integrated with the Apple ecosystem. I don't want to talk to it (I rarely use Siri currently because in my work env pulling up an app less obnoxious than talking to my phone during a meeting). I also am not convinced that wearable tech is the next wave; at least not the first generation. Wearing it on my wrist is only slightly more convenient that having it in my pocket.
1. Health sensors to replace the likes of Fitbit and FuelBand (and hopefully more extensive set of sensors). 2. Good battery life, at least 3 days. 3. Wireless charging. 4. Hands-free Siri. 5. Notification Center. 6. Vibration motor so that I don't miss important calls or notifications. 7. Can double as a remote control for Apple TV. 8. 8-16GB storage so that it can double as iPod nano. 9. Can remotely trigger iPhone/iPad to take a picture (I don't need iWatch to have a camera of its own).
My dream feature is an LTE modem like iPad, ideally with T-Mobile's free plan, to receive important notifications when I am not carrying iPhone with me.
I wonder how the watch band will connect to the actual watch part. Will this just be one seamless type piece or can you disconnect the watch part and therefore allow possible third parties to make bands. I am sure there would be a thriving market for bands in all shapes, sizes, colors, and materials if it can be detached.
I also wonder how adjustable and comfortable the band will be. I have a Breitling watch and it slips and slides a bit on my wrist. And since the watch part is very big and heavy I find myself adjusting it frequently. The problem with taking the band down a notch is that made it uncomfortably tight. Maybe Apple will have a design on size adjustment for the band that allows people to really get a comfortable fit that is tight enough not to slip and slide but not so tight as to pinch.
I would say this rumor is very likely to be true. I remember Apple acquiring iWatch patents all over the world with that shell company a long time back. It also just makes perfect sense as their next product category. This will be yet another affordable, entry type product like the iPod touch to help lock people into the iOS ecosystem.
1. Health sensors to replace the likes of Fitbit and FuelBand (and hopefully more extensive set of sensors).
2. Good battery life, at least 3 days.
3. Wireless charging.
4. Hands-free Siri.
5. Notification Center.
6. Vibration motor so that I don't miss important calls or notifications.
7. Can double as a remote control for Apple TV.
8. 8-16GB storage so that it can double as iPod nano.
9. Can remotely trigger iPhone/iPad to take a picture (I don't need iWatch to have a camera of its own).
My dream feature is an LTE modem like iPad, ideally with T-Mobile's free plan, to receive important notifications when I am not carrying iPhone with me.
No date and time? Let me guess: Who needs a watch to tell you the time when your phone has the time?
Comments
I think that is much closer to a winning product over something that tries to duplicate what a smartphone can do, like current smartwatches.
I don't mind AI or anyone else using mockups but these simply aren't good. A perfectly round bracelet that then requires you to slide your finger over it to use makes zero sense. I think AI could help their traffic by paying someone(s) to make a variety of mockups that would be owned by AI with their watermark.
Messaging
Compass
iPod
Apps
Recorder camera
GPS
Maps
Etc
Also if this is a health device what about the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the wearer?
My doc already says to take my iPhone out of my pocket and move my alarm clock away from my head.
Finally lol to end my monologue
I hope Apples watch team is carefully using the Pebble, Gear watch and Nike's two main watches, to see what works (no repeat of iTunes Radio?)
(Not sure that story on iTunes Radio is even true but still ...)
Does s/he say why?
You should consider getting a real doctor...
It's Apple's best-selling rumor ever!
I wonder how the watch band will connect to the actual watch part. Will this just be one seamless type piece or can you disconnect the watch part and therefore allow possible third parties to make bands. I am sure there would be a thriving market for bands in all shapes, sizes, colors, and materials if it can be detached.
I also wonder how adjustable and comfortable the band will be. I have a Breitling watch and it slips and slides a bit on my wrist. And since the watch part is very big and heavy I find myself adjusting it frequently. The problem with taking the band down a notch is that made it uncomfortably tight. Maybe Apple will have a design on size adjustment for the band that allows people to really get a comfortable fit that is tight enough not to slip and slide but not so tight as to pinch.
I would say this rumor is very likely to be true. I remember Apple acquiring iWatch patents all over the world with that shell company a long time back. It also just makes perfect sense as their next product category. This will be yet another affordable, entry type product like the iPod touch to help lock people into the iOS ecosystem.
Can AppleInsider please stick to FACTS please, otherwise what's the point ?
this is a NEWS site, not a best-guess rumor site.
The "Future Apple Hardware" section of the forum is traditionally the place to discuss rumors. The difference is that in the past there were some credible sources, the rumors were actual leaks and the discussions were much more interesting. Remember Think Secret? They had inside info that was often picked up here igniting densely crowded long discussions. Those days are over after Apple shutting down TS and plugging leaking holes, but the focus of this section has not changed because Apple never reveals its plans. Therefore future hardware discussions are closely tied to rumors circulating the web.
Can AppleInsider please stick to FACTS please, otherwise what's the point ?
this is a NEWS site, not a best-guess rumor site.
You are mistaken. As clearly stated on the home page titlebar:
"AppleInsider | News and rumors since 1997"
AI is doing a great job. I love their cheerleading!
I do wish, however, that AI would not confound the two, such as in the title vs. content of this story.
Yep, oled is definitely the way to go. Not only does it not use a backlight it also allows for individual pixels to be turned on while the others are completely off. The Moto X's Active Display uses this, and is rumored to be included in the Moto 360 as well.
And include a cutting laser and a strong magnetic field, just in case of Bond villains.
Can I drive my Tesla from the watch controls yet?
A wearable device is more of a subjective "thing" than a phone. All phones are generally flat, rectangular, and remain in your pocket until needed. A watch, much more visible, is even more prone to aesthetic likes and dislikes. As much as an Apple fan as I am, if the iWatch turns out to be a glorified Fuelband or a techy bracelet like all the concept pics, it won't fit my personal tastes. I would prefer something elegant, classy, not over-the-top geeky but still fully integrated with the Apple ecosystem. I don't want to talk to it (I rarely use Siri currently because in my work env pulling up an app less obnoxious than talking to my phone during a meeting). I also am not convinced that wearable tech is the next wave; at least not the first generation. Wearing it on my wrist is only slightly more convenient that having it in my pocket.
1. Health sensors to replace the likes of Fitbit and FuelBand (and hopefully more extensive set of sensors).
2. Good battery life, at least 3 days.
3. Wireless charging.
4. Hands-free Siri.
5. Notification Center.
6. Vibration motor so that I don't miss important calls or notifications.
7. Can double as a remote control for Apple TV.
8. 8-16GB storage so that it can double as iPod nano.
9. Can remotely trigger iPhone/iPad to take a picture (I don't need iWatch to have a camera of its own).
My dream feature is an LTE modem like iPad, ideally with T-Mobile's free plan, to receive important notifications when I am not carrying iPhone with me.
No date and time? Let me guess: Who needs a watch to tell you the time when your phone has the time?
Bingo you are right.