Weather Channel providing Apple more detailed data for iOS 8 Weather app than Yahoo did

124»

Comments

  • Reply 61 of 68
    mstone wrote: »
    konqerror wrote: »
     
    <span style="line-height:1.4em;">Something like 7% of all California freshwater usage is used for landscaping. 77% is used for agriculture. Moving water is ridiculously energy intensive. 20% of total </span>
    electrical<span style="line-height:1.4em;"> power is used to move water in California through things like the CA Aqueduct.</span>
    I know it is just a 'pipe' dream. Moving water from flood areas would never work because it comes too fast. It would require massive drainage projects to capture it fast enough to help mitigate the damage. It just makes me crazy to see so much unwanted water and snow on the TV news when California needs it so badly. 20% electricity cost is nothing compared to having all vegetation die and having huge fire fighting costs.
     

    <div class="quote-block" style="border-bottom-color:rgb(217,218,216);border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(217,218,216);border-left-style:solid;border-left-width:1px;border-right-color:rgb(217,218,216);border-right-style:solid;border-right-width:1px;border-top-color:rgb(217,218,216);border-top-style:solid;border-top-width:1px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-top:0px;padding-bottom:10px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px;padding-top:10px;">
    <p style="margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-top:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-top:0px;">The logical thing is instead of moving tons of water from wet areas, you move the finished food. But try to explain that to "local farming" global warming tree-huggers.</p>

    <div> </div>
    </div>



    We just need rain. It has nothing to do with political ideology. The notion of forsaking California as a dispensable food producing region and instead trucking in finished food from elsewhere is completely naive. California is responsible for around 15% of the total US agricultural production and much of their products are not produced anywhere else.

    Edit: Found this

    Ranks first in total agricultural production.

    Ranks first in total crops production.

    Ranks second in total livestock & livestock product production.

    Ranks first in production of almonds (100% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of avocados (96% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of broccoli (92% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of celery (93% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of dairy products (20% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of grapes (91% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of greenhouse/nursery (21% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of hay (14% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of lemons (89% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of lettuce (71% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of onions (31% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of peaches (54% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of pistachio nuts (100% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of plums (97% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of strawberries (83% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of tomatoes (53% of U.S. production).

    Ranks first in production of walnuts (100% of U.S. production).

    Incredible! California must be a fertile land.
  • Reply 62 of 68
    citycity Posts: 522member

    I prefer my weather information source to be wearing a sexy dress.

     

     

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post





    Incredible! California must be a fertile land.

    How does California rank in baby production?

  • Reply 63 of 68
    chris_cachris_ca Posts: 2,543member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by bdkennedy1 View Post

     

    This makes no sense to me. The Weather Channel gets their data from the National Weather Service offices around the country. So why didn't Apple just go to them instead?


    One reason is the NWS did not go to Apple and present them a plan as TWC did.

  • Reply 64 of 68
    chris_cachris_ca Posts: 2,543member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Benjamin Frost View Post

    (snip! 1/4 mile long quote removed)




    Incredible! California must be a fertile land.

    Hey, thanks for the really long quote including the extra line breaks¡

    Really drove your point home¡

  • Reply 65 of 68
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by city View Post

     

    I prefer my weather information source to be wearing a sexy dress.

     


    I do like Bri Winkler. You can download the ABC7 Los Angeles app to watch her video.

  • Reply 66 of 68
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    city wrote: »
    I prefer my weather information source to be wearing a sexy dress.


    How does California rank in baby production?

    2 words, Jackie Guerrido
  • Reply 67 of 68
    chris_ca wrote: »
    Incredible! California must be a fertile land.
    Hey, thanks for the really long quote including the extra line breaks¡
    Really drove your point home¡

    My pleasure!
  • Reply 68 of 68
    j1h15233j1h15233 Posts: 274member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post

     

     

    Can there be anything simpler? At a glance I can see the temperature, cloud cover, and wind speed at any point in the day, as well as where it will trend thereafter. Nothing but a graph can show that.


    It's way too busy. Very poor layout of that information.

Sign In or Register to comment.