You do understand that F.D.A. Stands for Food and Drug Administration right? In my opinion that organization could be a LOT more stringent.
The IAP item of topic is just a big ghost problem which is being extremely overblown by the media.
Of course I do. That's why I said "FDA-style", not "FDA". Other than that, I agree that this organisation could be more stringent, very much so, and you are pretty spot on the IAP issue. Isn't that what the media does, though, overblow topics to sell papers/eyeball time?
Comments
You do understand that F.D.A. Stands for Food and Drug Administration right? In my opinion that organization could be a LOT more stringent.
The IAP item of topic is just a big ghost problem which is being extremely overblown by the media.
Of course I do. That's why I said "FDA-style", not "FDA". Other than that, I agree that this organisation could be more stringent, very much so, and you are pretty spot on the IAP issue. Isn't that what the media does, though, overblow topics to sell papers/eyeball time?