Appellate court rejects $368 million VirnetX patent victory over Apple

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 35
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by nmg72 View Post



    You guys do realize that the infringement of the patents is valid, just not the amount awarded right? The appeal was for the amount awarded, not the validity of the patents. Apple is still going to have to pay for infringement. Apple will also still have to pay for licensing or they'll have to remove the parts in FaceTime that infringe on the patents.



    The reason the appeal was successful was the judges felt that incorrect directions were given to the jury AND that the testimony of an expert witness should have not been allowed. There is still the chance that a different jury could award the same amount.

    So how does one award damages for a patent they them selves did not use? Give them a buck? Or does Apple offer  for example(just guessing)  typical Fair and Reasonable for essential service fees?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 35
    pazuzupazuzu Posts: 1,728member
    Good for Apple since they didn't get that much from Samsung.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 35
    bitmod wrote: »
    Sooooo then... exactly how was Virnetx utilizing and implementing the patent in real-life applications?

    Don't you have to be actively using or developing the said patent to maintain it?

    Nope. Not in US
    Or does the US Government allow companies to patent vague and ambiguous concepts for suing other companies who one day develop a concept into a product that kinda resembles said concept patent?

    You can argue that something is too vague and get patent invalidated. Or that you made major improvement and this created a new invention. Argue that your invention came from another source. And so on
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 35
    fracfrac Posts: 480member
    sdw2001 wrote: »
    Court Ruling Prohibits Apple From Challenging Validity Of 16 VirnetX Patent Claims In New Patent Infringement Suit

    That worried me at the time and I never understood the logic.
    Anyone point me to the court judge's ruling?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 35
    hill60hill60 Posts: 6,992member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Frac View Post





    That worried me at the time and I never understood the logic.

    Anyone point me to the court judge's ruling?

     

    Can't anonymous requests be made to the PTO, as happens with every single patent Apple sues over?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 35

    I wonder when all these patent trolls are going to go out and invent something so I can sue them?  I'm in need of 300-400 million.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 35
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,772member
    hill60 wrote: »
    Can't anonymous requests be made to the PTO, as happens with every single patent Apple sues over?
    I think someone already did, perhaps either Cisco or Microsoft, with the claims re-examined and affirmed as valid by the USPTO.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 35

    To VirnetX Board of Morons;

     

    Apple fought some bloody war with Samsung ... and they've learnt a lot. That is, they are going to drag this thing forever and ever until you run out of $$. Mark my word.

     

    That said, you should've grabbed whatever $$ you got from them and hide your skinny asses! Now, it's just too late...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 35
    linkmanlinkman Posts: 1,074member

    I just patented warp drive, phasers, transporters, dilithium crystals, Heisenberg compensators, photon torpedoes, quantum torpedoes, tricorders, subspace communications, holodecks, replicators, impulse drive, metaphasic shields, and universal translators. Once they actually get invented I'll file a lawsuit if they don't license it from me. Apparently there is no requirement that I actually build anything that works -- just the concept is enough. Tomorrow I file for Star Wars tech.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 35
    To call virnetx a "company" is not a true description in my opinion.
    More like a bunch of hyena's.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 35
    Originally Posted by linkman View Post

    I just patented... ...dilithium crystals...



    Ha! Just got trilithium and hyvroxilated quint-ethyl metacetamin. Suck it!

     

    I was going to get neutronium, but it was rejected for being a real thing.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 35
    Doesn't Apple have enough money to just take over VirnetX in a hostile stock buyout and then fire everyone involved?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 35
    Originally Posted by Fuzzypaws View Post

    Doesn't Apple have enough money to just take over VirnetX in a hostile stock buyout and then fire everyone involved?



    Of course. It’d be distasteful, though.

     

    I support them doing it if after all the retrials and whatever they’re still found infringing.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 35
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by linkman View Post

     

    I just patented warp drive, phasers, transporters, dilithium crystals, Heisenberg compensators, photon torpedoes, quantum torpedoes, tricorders, subspace communications, holodecks, replicators, impulse drive, metaphasic shields, and universal translators. Once they actually get invented I'll file a lawsuit if they don't license it from me. Apparently there is no requirement that I actually build anything that works -- just the concept is enough. Tomorrow I file for Star Wars tech.


    I don't know if you should do this, because in one of the trials for Apple's design of the iPhone or iPad the tablets in the Star Trek saga have been used as prior art. :smokey:

    Can't remember if the judge accepted that.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 35
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,928member
    linkman wrote: »
    Tomorrow I file for Star Wars tech.

    I don't know if you can anymore. I'm sure they patented the tech a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.