No, just annoyed that he makes Apple fans look like the mindless zealots that fandroids accuse us of being. And it turned what could have been a good in-depth article about Apple's new approach to media relationships into nine short paragraphs of shallow observations and then a gazillion paragraphs of poorly edited filler.
That's without even mentioning that Gizmodo got taken off the do-not-invite list. Another obvious change in Apple's stance. Lots of interesting things that a tech blogger who's job it is to write about Apple could investigate, pull together and write about. Which is why some bloggers like Anand get hired by Apple and others only dream of such an outcome.
And it's not "all accurate" since some of it is just rehashed opinion we've seen from his other pieces.
Gruber, does a much better job. He'll either link to insightful pieces or write an insightful piece. His brevity is an advantage and much appreciated.
Comments
That's kudos to you.
I misread, apologies, and thanks.
Which are all accurate, feeling butthurt?
No, just annoyed that he makes Apple fans look like the mindless zealots that fandroids accuse us of being. And it turned what could have been a good in-depth article about Apple's new approach to media relationships into nine short paragraphs of shallow observations and then a gazillion paragraphs of poorly edited filler.
That's without even mentioning that Gizmodo got taken off the do-not-invite list. Another obvious change in Apple's stance. Lots of interesting things that a tech blogger who's job it is to write about Apple could investigate, pull together and write about. Which is why some bloggers like Anand get hired by Apple and others only dream of such an outcome.
And it's not "all accurate" since some of it is just rehashed opinion we've seen from his other pieces.
Gruber, does a much better job. He'll either link to insightful pieces or write an insightful piece. His brevity is an advantage and much appreciated.