Good point. I don't disagree with that, so I contradict myself!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Apple supports the formats that don't have a high potential for litigation, like Matroska, and that are HW accelerated, like H.264.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Apple supports the formats that don't have a high potential for litigation, like Matroska, and that are HW accelerated, like H.264.
That is definitely one reason. They used to charge for some codecs but include support in QTX:
"What about personal/commercial usage?
Some of the codecs distributed with VLC are patented and require you to pay royalties to their licensors. These are mostly the MPEG style codecs.
With many products the producer pays the license body (in this case MPEG LA) so the user (commercial or personal) does not have to take care of this. VLC (and ffmpeg and libmpeg2 which it uses in most of these cases) cannot do this because they are Free and Open Source implementations of these codecs. The software is not sold and therefore the end-user becomes responsible for complying to the licensing and royalty requirements. You will need to contact the licensor on how to comply to these licenses.
This goes for playing a DVD with VLC for your personal joy ($2.50 one time payment to MPEG LA) as well as for using VLC for streaming a live event in MPEG-4 over the Internet.
Is libdvdcss legal?
The use and distribution of the libdvdcss library is controversial in a few countries such as the United States because of a law called the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). If you are unsure about the legality of using and distributing this library in your country, please consult your lawyer.
Note
Beware: VLC media player binaries are distributed with the libdvdcss library included."
So VLC users are supposed to be paying MPEG-LA to playback some content, including for commercial use. That's where Apple has to be careful with bundled software because people doing something as simple as playing video in Keynote don't want to get caught in any licensing issues. It's unlikely that MPEG-LA would follow it up but legally Apple has to keep itself in the right.
Comments
Why perpetuate incompatibility?
Good point. I don't disagree with that, so I contradict myself!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Apple supports the formats that don't have a high potential for litigation, like Matroska, and that are HW accelerated, like H.264.
That is definitely one reason. They used to charge for some codecs but include support in QTX:
http://store.apple.com/us/product/D2187Z/A/quicktime-mpeg-2-playback-component-for-mac-os-x
There's an interesting FAQ about VLC here:
https://wiki.videolan.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions/
"What about personal/commercial usage?
Some of the codecs distributed with VLC are patented and require you to pay royalties to their licensors. These are mostly the MPEG style codecs.
With many products the producer pays the license body (in this case MPEG LA) so the user (commercial or personal) does not have to take care of this. VLC (and ffmpeg and libmpeg2 which it uses in most of these cases) cannot do this because they are Free and Open Source implementations of these codecs. The software is not sold and therefore the end-user becomes responsible for complying to the licensing and royalty requirements. You will need to contact the licensor on how to comply to these licenses.
This goes for playing a DVD with VLC for your personal joy ($2.50 one time payment to MPEG LA) as well as for using VLC for streaming a live event in MPEG-4 over the Internet.
Is libdvdcss legal?
The use and distribution of the libdvdcss library is controversial in a few countries such as the United States because of a law called the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). If you are unsure about the legality of using and distributing this library in your country, please consult your lawyer.
Note
Beware: VLC media player binaries are distributed with the libdvdcss library included."
So VLC users are supposed to be paying MPEG-LA to playback some content, including for commercial use. That's where Apple has to be careful with bundled software because people doing something as simple as playing video in Keynote don't want to get caught in any licensing issues. It's unlikely that MPEG-LA would follow it up but legally Apple has to keep itself in the right.