First look: Beastgrip Pro lens adapter platform for Apple's iPhone

Posted:
in iPhone edited April 2015
Beastgrip, makers of the camera mount used to shoot a Bentley car commercial, are back with a Kickstarter for a much-improved version of their camera mount, Beastgrip Pro. AppleInsider was given an opportunity to test out the prototype hardware ahead of the crowdfunding launch.


A prototype Beastgrip Pro


There are a lot of camera accessories for phones available these days, usually in the form of small lenses that stick on the phone directly, clip on as a part of some case, or clip on the phone, like Olloclip does.

For the most part, these are affordable, and do the job well. But sometimes, the occasion calls for something a bit more substantial.

Beastgrip is the project of Vadym Chalenko. Vadym lives in Chicago, and describes Beastgrip as a universal lens adapter and rig system for iPhone, Android or Windows phones, hand-crafted in the U.S.


This is a prototype Beastgrip Pro


The original Beastgrip, which we also tested, was a collection of 3D printed parts, metal tubing, springs, tripod sockets and machine screws that together formed a spring-loaded holder for a cameraphone and adapted a lens with a 37mm thread to the camera. The version launching on Kickstarter is an evolution of the original concept.

The new Beastgrip Pro is made from glass-filled nylon, and is injection molded. The machined brass lens threads are molded in place, and extra care was taken when they created their own custom machined aluminum thumbscrews with nylon tips, which give it a good feel when adjusting the product to fit your phone, and do not scratch the aluminum rods that act as the structure of the thing.

The handgrips are much improved, now molded with scallops for your fingers.


Handgrip


The lens mount now has cross hair marks, to help you center the phone's camera lens with the center of the aperature.


Cross-hairs to align the iPhone camera lens in the center of the external lens


An entirely new feature is the ability to separate the grip from the lens mount, so you can rapidly switch between the iPhone's lens and an external lens. The tripod mount and coldshoe mount are in the grip side of the device, so that functionality stays when you separate the lens.







It's important to know a few things about Beastgrip. It works with smaller phones as well as the larger iPhone 6 Plus in a case. It won't make you a professional, but it will help you get better shots if you are - the original Beastgrip was used for the Bentley commercial that was shot entirely on iPhone 5s and edited on iPad Air. http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/05/17/behind-the-scenes-of-bentleys-iphone-filmed-ipad-air-edited-ad

In our use, we took numerous still shots with it, but it also works well for video. The size of the Beast grip helps you get a steadier hand, but our new favorite way of recording video is to use Hyperlapse exported at 1x. That, combined with lenses works really well.

All of AppleInsider's 2015 CES photography shot at the show was shot with an iPhone 6 in an original Beastgrip and Beastgrip Pro early prototype, using Neewer or Sony Wide-Angle converter lenses.


The original Beastgrip. This was the kind used for shooting the Bentley video.


It's important to point out that lens selection is critical. Some lenses are better than others, and while the Sony glass is a good lens, in order to use it with Beastgrip, it required a 10x Macro lens on its back. This introduced some distortion that the lens otherwise doesn't have.

This was necessary because the Sony is physcially so wide that it conflicts with the face of Beastgrip Pro unless you step it away from the mount with the use of the Macro. This problem is not present when using the Neewar lens. To solve this problem for users new to Beastgrip Pro, they have done an intensive study of which lenses work best, branded them as Beastgrip lenses, and are making them available as a part of the kickstarter.

They've also produced what may be the best depth-of-field adapter we've seen yet. The Beastgrip DOF adapter allows you to connect traditional 35mm camera lenses to the Beastgrip using what are essentially macro extension tubes.

It has a 35mm focusing screen in the middle of the adapter. The 35mm lens projects the image on the focusing screen, and the iPhone focuses its camera on the screen. The pictures are upside down on the iPhone's screen, but there are a number of apps that flip the image: Filmic and Ultrakam are the standards for this, and Beastgrip are working on their own app as well.


The buttons that make adjusting the focusing screen easier.


What makes this DOF adapter the best is that it's got large buttons that make it easy to adjust the orientation of the focusing screen. You screw on the DOF adapter, and it's not certain that it will screw on the same way twice, depending on how tight or loose you install it. Loosen the adapter in the middle, adjust the screen orientation, and tighten the adapter, and it's set.

We used a Nikon f/1.4 50mm lens in our shooting, and it was possible to see the texture of the focusing screen in the image, but this is part of the character of using it. Other things that you might see depending on lens choice are vignetting, barrel distortion, chromatic aberration. But then, photographers have chosen equipment that intentionally decreases photographic quality for years -- if the result is desirable, it's worth it.

Depending on which application you use when shooting with the DOF adapter, you will either see the edges as we do in the flowers picture below, or your application may crop the photo automatically, to eliminate seeing those edges. Afterlight is an app available for editing photos, including removing the vignetting







The Beastgrip has one hotshoe mount, which we've used for both a Manfrotto 24 LED light, as well as a Rode shotgun microphone. Unfortunately, the Beastgrip only has one hotshoe, making it an either/or proposition for the mic or lamp out of the box. Beastgrip does have 1/4" tripod screws on the tops and bottoms of the left and right grips, and we're looking into using those as mounts for the lamp and microphone.

Vadym advised that we not use the tripod screws on the tops or bottoms of the handgrips to mount the Beastgrip, but instead to use them to mount accessories. The only place a tripod should be mounted is in the socket directly under the phone in the spring clamp area.

We mounted two additional coldshoe mounts on the tops of the handgrips, and then mounted a Manfrotto 24 LED lamp on one and a Rode shotgun microphone on the other. Again, all out CES 2015 videos were shot using the Rode mic mounted on Beastgrip Pro.




Mounting the phone in Beastgrip isn't hard. Pull on the spring-loaded clamp and insert the phone. Loosen the top and bottom thumbscrews, and slide the phone left and right until the phone's camera lens lines up with the center of the lens aperture.

Lock it into place by tightening the screws, and also tighten the thumbscrew that keeps the springloaded clamp from coming open. Adjust the height of the lens to accomodate the position of the lens on the back of the phone. This works well when trying to accomodate a center-mounted camera like a Moto X.

Spring-loaded phone mount. Adjustable for phone width.
Spring-loaded phone mount. Adjustable for phone width.


Holding Beastgrip takes a little getting used to. It's far lighter than a DSLR, and if the iPhone is your only good camera, adding lenses makes it better.

These are neat things to try out, and they can help give you interesting effects with foreground and background focus, but the value here is, being able to use really good lenses (the Neewer lenses are Japanese optics), being able to attach a lamp and microphone, and being able to do so with a range of phones and cases.

Clearly, it's gotten professional results when used by people who know what they're doing -- and that's the truth for most cameras. What makes this work is that the phone as a camera is potentially so much easier to get good results out of in the hands of someone who has practiced with it.

Good lenses don't overcome a bad phone camera or bad cameraphone user, but the shots you can get that you'd otherwise miss or have to work to get right in post-processing are worth it.

From our time with the Beastgrip as well as the prototype of the new successor, we feel comfortable recommending the hardware without reservation. If you take many photos and need macro, wide, or fisheye, this is not the smallest way to get them, but it's a really good way to accomplish it and up your iPhone photography game.

Based on the fact that they delivered the original unit, and had the prototype for us at CES, and are already funded, we have complete confidence that they'll be able to deliver the product to their backers.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,251member
    The lenses you're using look awfully large and I'd be interested in seeing how the small iPhone camera sensor interacts with such a large, normal optical area. Are these lenses intended for small cameras, 4/3's cameras, 16mm, what? I can't see a normal 35mm camera lens working all that well since it would only use a small portion of the center of the lens. A diagram showing this would be helpful as well as how someone is supposed to focus (I presume you'd focus the large lens at the distance you want and let the iPhone focus on the lens' focal point?

    (It's been awhile since I discussed lenses so some of my wording is probably wrong.)
  • Reply 2 of 14
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member

    This still seems like a huge compromise. Shooting through two lenses will screw up your color balance and exposure big time. I know you already paid for the iPhone but a dedicated consumer video camera around $700 is so much better. You get a big fast lens with 10x optical zoom, lots of different shooting modes, big CMOS chip and removable memory cards. The iPhone does give you GPS but that is a small trade off, in my opinion, for much better video quality with a dedicated camera. Why any professional would choose this rig, I do not understand.

  • Reply 3 of 14
    staticx57staticx57 Posts: 405member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     

    This still seems like a huge compromise. Shooting through two lenses will screw up your color balance and exposure big time. I know you already paid for the iPhone but a dedicated consumer video camera around $700 is so much better. You get a big fast lens with 10x optical zoom, lots of different shooting modes, big CMOS chip and removable memory cards. The iPhone does give you GPS but that is a small trade off, in my opinion, for much better video quality with a dedicated camera. Why any professional would choose this rig, I do not understand.


    Size perhaps? But anyways, adding lens has no effect on exposure since the camera will just compensate by changing the settings. There is a limit to it of course, but in bright day light it is no different than putting on a small ND filter, which is to say, not much.

  • Reply 4 of 14
    jd_in_sbjd_in_sb Posts: 1,600member
    Why would someone buy this instead of using a DSLR?
  • Reply 5 of 14
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by staticx57 View Post

     

    Size perhaps? But anyways, adding lens has no effect on exposure since the camera will just compensate by changing the settings. There is a limit to it of course, but in bright day light it is no different than putting on a small ND filter, which is to say, not much.




    I think it is a bit more than a filter which is super thin. iPhone has f2.2 or there about. When you add another larger mediocre piece of glass, you might add another f4, which makes for a pretty slow lens when you combine them, so it could have an affect on exposure, shadow detail, color, etc.

  • Reply 6 of 14
    ...or you could just buy a DSLR and call it a day.
  • Reply 7 of 14
    staticx57staticx57 Posts: 405member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     



    I think it is a bit more than a filter which is super thin. iPhone has f2.2 or there about. When you add another larger mediocre piece of glass, you might add another f4, which makes for a pretty slow lens when you combine them, so it could have an affect on exposure, shadow detail, color, etc.


    Except, that really is not how it works. Exposure is determined by the net of the glass in front of the meter or sensor. So the camera will compensate automatically. shadow detail and color are affected by the sensor and the processing algorithms used to turn the sensor data into an image.

     

    When I mentioned an ND filter is the effect it has on an image which is just that it forces your exposure to compensate by a certain amount without affecting anything other than that. That is what more glass does as well. Secondly, you do not just "add" fstop.

  • Reply 8 of 14
    This seems a step in the right direction, but what needs to happen is some kind of system to seamlessly integrate an iPhone into the body of a camera via the Lightning port. Let the iPhone be the brains and add its special abilities to the camera body. This would be phenomenal.
  • Reply 9 of 14
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by nathanimal View Post



    This seems a step in the right direction, but what needs to happen is some kind of system to seamlessly integrate an iPhone into the body of a camera via the Lightning port. Let the iPhone be the brains and add its special abilities to the camera body. This would be phenomenal.

    Oh my lord, yes.

     

    Samsung tried with the Galaxy Cameras, twice. But there, it wasn't an accessory as you describe, it was an Android-powered camera.

     

    I think the current closest product to what you're talking about are the Sony and Olympus camera/lenses that use Wifi to pair with the iPhone. The Olympus lets you use Micro 4/3 lenses with theirs.

     

    The problem is, I want to be able to use the apps I'm familiar with to control the camera - I want to be able to use Hyperlapse for video. I want to be able to decide which camera app I use for photos, iOS, Camera+, VSCO, whatever. I don't want to be locked into the app that enables the functionality of the accessory you and I imagine.

  • Reply 10 of 14
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by staticx57 View Post

     

    Except, that really is not how it works. Exposure is determined by the net of the glass in front of the meter or sensor. So the camera will compensate automatically. shadow detail and color are affected by the sensor and the processing algorithms used to turn the sensor data into an image.

     

    When I mentioned an ND filter is the effect it has on an image which is just that it forces your exposure to compensate by a certain amount without affecting anything other than that. That is what more glass does as well. Secondly, you do not just "add" fstop.


    The iPhone camera compensates some, but the lens is a determining factor, too.

     

    I used a Nikkor 50mm f1.4 lens, because that's what I could affordably get on eBay. The reason I went with the 1.4 instead of something more common like a 1.8 is that the extension tubes in the DOF adapter make it a little darker. I wanted as much light in as possible without spending on a f1.2 lens.

  • Reply 11 of 14
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by MidwestAppleFan View Post



    ...or you could just buy a DSLR and call it a day.

    You certainly could, and that wouldn't be a bad thing, necessarily.

     

    For CES 2014, I used a Canon DSLR loaned to me by AI. It worked fine, but it was heavy. It had no data connection. It had no amazing way of smoothing out the video unless I used a steadicam arrangement.

     

    Here, I was able to use my lighter iPhone, iMessage the photos back to the editorial team directly from the iPhone/camera, and for our videos, I was able to use Hyperlapse and export them at 1x, eliminating almost all hand-shake from the video.

     

    I was able to use camera applications I was familiar with. All that is to say is, use the tool appropriate for the job and the person behind the camera.

  • Reply 12 of 14
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     



    I think it is a bit more than a filter which is super thin. iPhone has f2.2 or there about. When you add another larger mediocre piece of glass, you might add another f4, which makes for a pretty slow lens when you combine them, so it could have an affect on exposure, shadow detail, color, etc.


    A comment on "mediocre" - you're right, it's important to try and not use mediocre glass.

     

    The focusing screen in the DOF adapter is a Canon part. 

    The 35mm Nikkor-S f1.4 lens I used is a bit old, but in good condition (no mold, no yellowing) and I would consider it better than mediocre.

     

    The Neewer lenses I used were certainly affordable, but not bad. The Panasonic wide-angle I tried? The small Cokin ones meant for video use? Ok, those were mediocre (in my opinion.)

  • Reply 13 of 14
    vmarksvmarks Posts: 762editor
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by rob53 View Post



    The lenses you're using look awfully large and I'd be interested in seeing how the small iPhone camera sensor interacts with such a large, normal optical area. Are these lenses intended for small cameras, 4/3's cameras, 16mm, what? I can't see a normal 35mm camera lens working all that well since it would only use a small portion of the center of the lens. A diagram showing this would be helpful as well as how someone is supposed to focus (I presume you'd focus the large lens at the distance you want and let the iPhone focus on the lens' focal point?



    (It's been awhile since I discussed lenses so some of my wording is probably wrong.)

     

     

    The 37mm thread in the Beastgrip Pro adapts to a 52mm thread with a step up ring. I used lenses meant for video for the 37mm and 52mm thread.

     

    I also used a 35mm lens, and the picture of the roses and the picture of me were both taken using that Nikkor-S f1.4 35mm lens. It's a No. 637940 if that helps anyone identify it.

     

    Here's the DOF setup - 

     

    Camera phone lens -> 37mm close-up +10 -> 37-52 step up ring ->  Opteka High Definition Macro 10x -> 52-60mm step up -> 14mm extension tube -> Focusing Screen holder -> 7mm extension tube -> 28mm extension tube -> Canon to Nikon mount adapter -> Nikkor-S lens

     

    The phone camera focus on the focusing screen. The Nikon lens projects its image onto the focusing screen just as it would in an SLR. The whole business with extension tubes is to get the distances so the phone can focus on the screen, and the screen is positioned the same distance from the lens as it would be in an SLR body.

     

    In practice, I tap the screen of the iPhone to get it to focus on the focusing screen and adjust for exposure, I open the aperture of the Nikon lens all the way, and focus on my subject. The lens allows me to get my subject in sharp focus and the background out of focus. Sure, I can accomplish similar results using an app like Big Lens, but there's something real about manually focusing the lens that works for me.

  • Reply 14 of 14
    foggyhillfoggyhill Posts: 4,767member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by vmarks View Post

     

    You certainly could, and that wouldn't be a bad thing, necessarily.

     

    For CES 2014, I used a Canon DSLR loaned to me by AI. It worked fine, but it was heavy. It had no data connection. It had no amazing way of smoothing out the video unless I used a steadicam arrangement.

     

    Here, I was able to use my lighter iPhone, iMessage the photos back to the editorial team directly from the iPhone/camera, and for our videos, I was able to use Hyperlapse and export them at 1x, eliminating almost all hand-shake from the video.

     

    I was able to use camera applications I was familiar with. All that is to say is, use the tool appropriate for the job and the person behind the camera.


     

    Yeah, your taking a hit on the camera side and improving the connectivity, quick editing side. Depends on what you use a camera/video for. People that do mid to high end filmmaking are certainly not the public for this: prosumers, live video blogger, small indie filmmakers, etc would be the target.

Sign In or Register to comment.