Apple publishes Apple Watch band design guidelines for accessory makers

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 24
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    sflagel wrote: »
    Thanks. The article does not make that clear.

    it's a given. thats the point of MFI licensing
  • Reply 22 of 24
    sflagelsflagel Posts: 805member
    nolamacguy wrote: »
    it's a given. thats the point of MFI licensing

    I don't know what MFI licensing is. And the article does not mention the word "licensing" anywhere.

    In any case, I appreciate some people on this forum enlightening me.
  • Reply 23 of 24
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    sflagel wrote: »
    I don't know what MFI licensing is. And the article does not mention the word "licensing" anywhere.

    first hit for "mfi" in google is an apple.com page describing the Made for iPod/iPhone/iPad program and the wiki page two down is also good. the "Made for Apple Watch program" in this article is a variant of that. but yes, it article could have mentioned the highly successful MFi program too.
  • Reply 24 of 24
    hmmhmm Posts: 3,405member

    Originally Posted by eightzero View Post

     

    I'm not sure that apple has iPhone case attachment patents. Watch has at least a design patent on the attach mechanism. But of course, how aggressive Apple is going to be with their patent enforcement is still unknown. Doubt they are after the mall kiosks.


    I'm not sure design patent is the right term for something relating to the connector. As for cases, it's unlikely that they could patent all workable configurations of an iphone case or enforce such a thing.

Sign In or Register to comment.