'Freedom' by Pharrell Williams will be an Apple Music launch exclusive

13

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 62
    Quick, someone call Michael Bromwich. Smells like another case of Apple colluding with content owners to hurt competitors. /s
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 62
    19831983 Posts: 1,225member

    I ike Pharrell, he's a very nice guy.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 62
    bobschlobbobschlob Posts: 1,074member

    Ah ha! I knew there was a reason AAPL was up almost 2% today!!

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 62
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by BobSchlob View Post

     

    Ah ha! I knew there was a reason AAPL was up almost 2% today!!




    Ichan tweeted today.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 45 of 62
    SpamSandwichspamsandwich Posts: 33,407member
    bobschlob wrote: »
    Ah ha! I knew there was a reason AAPL was up almost 2% today!!

    It's all because of one song. Impressive! /s
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 46 of 62
    rogifan wrote: »
    So how much does Apple have to shell out for this exclusive? People hate exclusivity. I hope it doesn't happen very often. And I'm sure it won't as the DOJ and EU would be all over that in a heartbeat.

    I was joking, but you are serious LOL.
    If all that the self-important tech sites and bloggers can do is take shots at Apple with their editorials (backed by like-minded forum users who secretly covet exclusive content for their Android phones), then let them troll. We've already seen that Apple listens to no one except Taylor Swift and the Chinese market. :lol:
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 47 of 62
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    rogifan wrote: »
    Why? Why do you hate Spotify so much? I'm sorry but I find this whole idea of "winning" being opening up the checkbook to buy exclusivity with big name artists kind of distasteful. There's nothing innovative about that. Plus it's in Apple's interest for Spotify and others to be successful. Just like it was in Microsoft's interest that Apple remain a viable alternative in the PC space.


    I don't want Apple to be the only streaming game in town. But Spotify has played dirty, now they need to get what's coming to them. They've been stirring all this antitrust crap up.

    It's business, everybody plays dirty. They offered a service with terms, and those terms were accepted.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 48 of 62
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    saarek wrote: »
    I'm getting old, don't have any idea who most of these "stars" are.

    He's more of a composer/producer than an actual singer, but lately he's known more for the latter. He was part of a production team called the Neptunes. It may seem like he burst out of nowhere and onto the music scene but he's actually been in the industry for over 20 yrs.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 49 of 62
    wood1208wood1208 Posts: 2,954member
    Thank you Apple.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 50 of 62
    danielswdanielsw Posts: 906member
    rogifan wrote: »
    . . . People hate exclusivity. . . .
    All generalities are false--especially this one.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 51 of 62
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post



    So how much does Apple have to shell out for this exclusive? People hate exclusivity. I hope it doesn't happen very often. And I'm sure it won't as the DOJ and EU would be all over that in a heartbeat.

     

    Why have your posts been so irrationally negative over the past few months?

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 52 of 62
    dasanman69dasanman69 Posts: 13,002member
    danielsw wrote: »
    rogifan wrote: »
    . . . People hate exclusivity. . . .
    All generalities are false--especially this one.

    Which one is false? The one you wrote or the one you quoted? :lol:
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 53 of 62
    Marvinmarvin Posts: 15,585moderator
    larrya wrote: »
    I wonder how many times I'll get to hear the word, "freedom" repeated in this song, or how many times I'll have to hear the song every time I turn on the TV. Yes, you may have guessed by now, I hated the repetitive, monotonous "Happy" with a white-hot passion that only grew each new time it was forced down my throat.

    In this one he repeats the word a lot but also splits the word up:

    http://genius.com/Pharrell-williams-freedom-lyrics

    "Your first name is Free
    Last name is Dom

    Your first name is King
    Last name is Dom"

    Dom is pronounced dumb i.e 'Your last name is dumb'. I'm guessing he wrote the lyrics, he seems to write a lot of songs:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Songs_written_by_Pharrell_Williams

    He does adjust how he repeats the word 'freedom', he screams it the first 3 times in the chorus and then does it a different way:


    [VIDEO]


    I quite liked the song Happy. The Freedom one has a catchy sound but I don't like it. The audience seemed to like it ok though. Individual tastes aren't going to determine how popular a song is.
    boltsfan17 wrote:
    I absolutely hate all the exclusives in the gaming industry. I think the decision having the very popular Tomb Raider game be a timed exclusive on Xbox One is really going to backfire. I've been a big fan of that franchise, but I will not be buying it when it finally releases on the PS4. I think many people who only have the PS4 will not be buying it either due to the exclusive bs.

    People will buy it if the product is good enough. Some exclusive games I've missed completely like The Last of Us but Alan Wake made it to the PC after 2 years. Tomb Raider is a good franchise so I'll support the game and forget the politics behind it.

    It just takes 1 service to do an exclusive to mess everything up anyway. If Apple (and we could be talking about Iovine here) agreed to have no exclusives and Spotify comes along with one exclusive, people would just say they could get everything Apple Music has but also the exclusive so it's better and Apple loses business. If consoles had no exclusives, there's a very real possibility that one of them could sell close to zero units.

    Exclusivity is one of those odd things that's sort of anti-competitive both ways. If someone has an exclusive then other services can't compete for business. If nobody has exclusive content (a unique selling point) then none are any better than the other so where does the competitive element come from? That just puts price ahead of everything else. Everybody can sell books but few people can compete with Amazon on price and not because Amazon is the best company.

    Video streaming services are all aiming to tie up exclusive content deals because that's the only way they can have a competitive advantage.

    Apple does this with hardware where their OS is exclusive to the hardware. If Apple allowed iOS to run on any device, their revenue would collapse to a fraction of what it is.

    Right now, Apple needs to convince people who are entrenched with Spotify away from that service. If Spotify users can get everything that's on Apple Music, they're not moving anywhere because it's cheaper. This is where Iovine is going to make his mark because he's even got Jay Z calling on him to not being too hard on Tidal. Nobody's calling on Spotify because they have no leverage with artists:

    http://www.businessinsider.com/jay-z-rumors-jimmy-iovine-tidal-2015-3
    http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6516928/jay-z-tidal-jimmy-iovine-interview

    Jay Z pointed out there that this isn't as much about the services as the musicians. Spotify isn't paying the artists enough so there needs to be a better model. Artists should really be getting a higher portion of the royalties too but the revenues from advertising-supported systems isn't enough. These labels have to pay for their own advertising so you can't support artists that need to be marketed themselves with revenue from marketing other products. People need to pay for audio content just like they do for movies. There's no ad-supported movie service because it would never pay enough. Netflix subscriptions barely pay enough for good content.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 54 of 62
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    Why have your posts been so irrationally negative over the past few months?

    Mostly about Apple Music. I think it's been sort of a clusterf*ucj so far and not worthy of a "one more thing" from Apple.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 55 of 62
    palegolas wrote: »
    Drake, no dis, but what was he thinking up there? It was like he was pulled in last minute, with no preparation, barely knowing what it was he was supposed to be talking about.. I felt so bad for him...

    Neither did Christy Turlington Burns. She flew in for the Watch keynote and kind of smiled and exchanged pleasantries with Tim Cook.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 56 of 62
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,398member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post





    Mostly about Apple Music. I think it's been sort of a clusterf*ucj so far and not worthy of a "one more thing" from Apple.

     

    No, it hasn't been about Apple Music mostly, that was just announced a couple weeks ago. Stop lying. He said "few months", which is true. You've become quite the troll. How the hell is it a "clusterfuck" when it hasn't even launched yet, and you have not given it a chance? It seems to be a very well rounded package at a more than reasonable price, but all you've done is bitch, whine, and attack it while NEVER, EVER offering any kind of alternative or real reason. Apple Music will be huge, and definitely worthy of "one more thing", except to irrational haters like you. I noticed you also troll Apple on Macrumors (even though I've only visited their forums a handful of times) - you certainly have time in your day to get around. 

     

    Maybe once in a while chill out and give the products from the company you claim to like a chance, before making hundreds of posts trashing them with no reasons given. 

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 57 of 62

    Exclusive? The whole song is already on youtube. Great live ver. I must say.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 58 of 62
    thomprthompr Posts: 1,521member

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple v. Samsung View Post



    For people who do not have the selected home for the exclusive it makes them mad they lose out on something they won't.

    Everyone will have an opportunity to try AppleMusic for free and not "lose out" on anything exclusive.  My hunch is that the exclusivity period for this song (and maybe others) won't last beyond the end of the free trial.

     

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple v. Samsung View Post



    For those who do have said service it makes no difference except for some it becomes asshole Bragging rights.

    People who try AppleMusic will temporarily have some content that is unavailable elsewhere, and if they value that content, then it made a difference.  Asshole bragging rights?  Are you picturing someone running around singing "I have Pharrell's new song, and you don't"?

     

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple v. Samsung View Post



    And worst case scenario everyone starts doing this. Now Apple has the new album for artist x while Spotify has the album for artist Y and Google has artist z. And poor you are fan of all three.

    I don't think it will turn into that.  These exclusives are time limited.

     

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Apple v. Samsung View Post



    BTW it does not make people switch services. As I'm certain no one on this site would switch from Apple music to Google music to follow their favorite artist. They will just say Google is bad.

     

    Maybe nobody on this site, because we are somewhat biased (justifiably so, or not).  But if you think that your typical young music fan won't follow their favorite artist to another service, then you are severely out-of-touch.

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 59 of 62
    thomprthompr Posts: 1,521member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Randell Gortney View Post

     

    Exclusive? The whole song is already on youtube. Great live ver. I must say.


    I think that YouTube is a different type of thing altogether and may be outside the exclusivity arrangements.

     

    Thompson

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 60 of 62
    foggyhillfoggyhill Posts: 4,767member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Rogifan View Post





    No I think it's bad in general and I'm disappointed that Apple is joining in. Btw, I thought it was silly and hypocritical when Target complained about Beyoncé because they do the same damn thing. My guess is this won't be exclusive for very long. Pharrell wants as many people as possible hearing his stuff and Apple doesn't want to give the DOJ or EU an easy target.

     

    Verge is now a piece of shit site. The hack job perfunctory review of the Apple Watch (on which they were showed up as IDIOTS) proves just that. Go to real tech sites with a solid technical expertise and not self promoting hacks who play a hand way large than their competency for info.

     

    BTW, the god damn artist (and any service or product provider) can sell his wares however he feels like it; including exclusivity. There's hundred's of year of precedence on this... That's how capitalism work. Ain't it grand...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.