Capability and wanting are 2 different things. Wanting something doesn't make it right. What you're saying only confirms that it is mutable choice and therefor not a civil rights issue.
Religion is a choice and it is a civil rights issue, so I would have to say that you continue to be incorrect. To a certain extent, race is also a choice as people of mixed race tend to identify with their choice of only one of their heritage races (and also to a certain extent, society imposes a view upon them - if someone is 25% Black and identifies with being Black, society is okay with that, but if they're 25% White and identify with being White, we tend not to accept that and think that they're cheating and trying to "pass". There were even laws in the South defining anyone as Black who had more than 5% Black heritage).
So I would say that what the Constitution is and what some people want it to be, like yourself, are two different things. You personally don't like the idea of LGBT people so you want to say that their civil rights are not guaranteed by the Constitution, thereby imposing your view onto everyone else. Luckily, the Constitution protects us from people like you.
Capability and wanting are 2 different things. Wanting something doesn't make it right. What you're saying only confirms that it is mutable choice and therefor not a civil rights issue.
No, it only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about. If you are attracted to both sexes you are bisexual. That's your sexuality and it's not a choice. As a bisexual man choosing to only engage in heterosexual sex doesn't change your sexuality, you still are bisexual. Not everyone is like you though, there are also heterosexual people (people who are only attracted to the oposite sex), homosexual people (people who are only attracted to the same sex) and asexual people (people who aren't attracted to either sex).
Every man I meet I have to remind myself that I chose not to be attracted to men. One time I forgot and accidentally ending up blowing an elder gentleman in the toilet of Waterloo train station, but I've improved my choice memory since then.
Comments
Capability and wanting are 2 different things. Wanting something doesn't make it right. What you're saying only confirms that it is mutable choice and therefor not a civil rights issue.
Religion is a choice and it is a civil rights issue, so I would have to say that you continue to be incorrect. To a certain extent, race is also a choice as people of mixed race tend to identify with their choice of only one of their heritage races (and also to a certain extent, society imposes a view upon them - if someone is 25% Black and identifies with being Black, society is okay with that, but if they're 25% White and identify with being White, we tend not to accept that and think that they're cheating and trying to "pass". There were even laws in the South defining anyone as Black who had more than 5% Black heritage).
So I would say that what the Constitution is and what some people want it to be, like yourself, are two different things. You personally don't like the idea of LGBT people so you want to say that their civil rights are not guaranteed by the Constitution, thereby imposing your view onto everyone else. Luckily, the Constitution protects us from people like you.
Capability and wanting are 2 different things. Wanting something doesn't make it right. What you're saying only confirms that it is mutable choice and therefor not a civil rights issue.
No, it only confirms you have no idea what you are talking about. If you are attracted to both sexes you are bisexual. That's your sexuality and it's not a choice. As a bisexual man choosing to only engage in heterosexual sex doesn't change your sexuality, you still are bisexual. Not everyone is like you though, there are also heterosexual people (people who are only attracted to the oposite sex), homosexual people (people who are only attracted to the same sex) and asexual people (people who aren't attracted to either sex).
*snort*