I mean, if Apple are guilty then they should pay - but if they believe themselves to be not guilty and can prove it, then take it to wherever they can get a fair unbiased ruling.
Agree. Apple should appeal the decision if they believe they're innocent.
Apple needs to pin their hopes on Samsung for this one. Apple's infringement (stealing as we simplistically call it here)
Mmm.
I think it gets called 'stealing' around here when the case throws up an email instructing the design engineers to steal. I don't think we have such an email in this instance.
Still, as others have said, Apple has no choice but to fight it. They don't want to look like a soft target for this sort of thing.
I think it gets called 'stealing' around here when the case throws up an email instructing the design engineers to steal. I don't think we have such an email in this instance.
Still, as others have said, Apple has no choice but to fight it. They don't want to look like a soft target for this sort of thing.
@Rayz : Sure, but no court found such "willful" copying anywhere anytime. What are you basing this on? Otherwise, I think it's safe to assume Apple's theft.
I'm pretty sure the lawyers at Smartflash are saying the same : they have no choice but to fight it. They can't just let big guys like Apple walk all over them.
Comments
She keeps pulling the football away at the last second.
All your life.
Agree. Appeal the decision.
Agree. Appeal the decision.
Definitely f'n don't !
I mean, if Apple are guilty then they should pay - but if they believe themselves to be not guilty and can prove it, then take it to wherever they can get a fair unbiased ruling.
Agree. Apple should appeal the decision if they believe they're innocent.
Apple needs to pin their hopes on Samsung for this one. Apple's infringement (stealing as we simplistically call it here)
Mmm.
I think it gets called 'stealing' around here when the case throws up an email instructing the design engineers to steal. I don't think we have such an email in this instance.
Still, as others have said, Apple has no choice but to fight it. They don't want to look like a soft target for this sort of thing.
Mmm.
I think it gets called 'stealing' around here when the case throws up an email instructing the design engineers to steal. I don't think we have such an email in this instance.
Still, as others have said, Apple has no choice but to fight it. They don't want to look like a soft target for this sort of thing.
@Rayz : Sure, but no court found such "willful" copying anywhere anytime. What are you basing this on? Otherwise, I think it's safe to assume Apple's theft.
I'm pretty sure the lawyers at Smartflash are saying the same : they have no choice but to fight it. They can't just let big guys like Apple walk all over them.