Nvidia can they become larger than Intel
June 12, 2002 11:47AM
edited January 2014
Nvidia's CEO says the they want to be everywhere pixels are generated. He also foresee that Nvidia will be larger than Intel in 5 years. Do you agree? Discuss
Reply 1 of 8
June 12, 2002 1:16PM
Personally, I think Wired's article on the issue is bull.
Then again, IBM didn't care whether Microsoft kep DOS. They thought the hardware was important.
This is just one form of hardware that someone thinks is important, while anothe doesn't .
Reply 2 of 8
June 12, 2002 1:48PM
Yeah I thought that statement might be a little bold. We're going to have to see more from nvidia...not just the evolution of the GeForce cards and Nforce muthaboards.
Reply 3 of 8
June 12, 2002 2:33PM
nVidia would be nowhere without competition. The graphics market has always been a bit dodgy. 3Dfx looked unbeatable in 1998. Before that Cirrus was pretty big...
Reply 4 of 8
June 12, 2002 2:42PM
If nVidia makes claims like that I'm gonna start buying ATI.
Competition is what drives the industry, especially 3D chipsets.
Reply 5 of 8
June 14, 2002 12:47PM
I think he meant Nvidia would be larger than Intel in graphics marketshare as Intel is and has been the leader in graphics marketshare for quite some time. Many more integrated i810 motherboards are in use than Nvidia video cards.
Reply 6 of 8
June 14, 2002 7:25PM
That makes a lot more sense.
Reply 7 of 8
June 15, 2002 7:07PM
[quote] Discuss <hr></blockquote>
Dude, what is with people putting a couple of sentences or a link to a artical without contributing anything to the new thread? Gah!
I wouldn't put it pass Nvidia to try and seize control of the graphics market by using various motherboards and such to squeeze ATI out of the picture. If Nvidia wants to be everywhere pixels are generated they should take a crack at monitors
As for being bigger than Intel, not with in the next 15 years.
Reply 8 of 8
June 15, 2002 8:13PM
ATI has IGP to combat nVidia's nForce.