jungmark wrote: »
DOJ didn't mention its take from this sham.
And how about a federal investigation of judge Cote and Bromwich for what is the most blatant case of collusion, bribery, extortion and nepotism in recent years? Disgraceful.
I think Cote is a lousy judge who has it in for Apple and Bromwich seems have shown blatant anti-Apple bias and a penchant for running up the fees as high as Cote could possibly allow them to go. But your accusation of "collusion, bribery, extortion and nepotism" is unfounded and to quote you, is "DISGRACEFUL." Your comment is incredibly inappropriate and of the type that makes a case for the kind of libel and slander laws enacted in EU.
Perhaps you would care to explain how any of the activity between Cote and Bromwich meets the legal definition of corruption. Would you feel the same if it were Samsung or LG instead of Apple? I think not.