Apple R&D spending jumps to $2.5B in Q2, accounted for 5% of total revenue

Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited April 2016
Apple's research and development spending spiked at an all time high of more than $2.5 billion during the second quarter of 2016, with the unusually large $600 million year-over-year jump owing primarily to new hires and related expenses, Apple said in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing.


The location of Apple's forthcoming Cambridge R&D center in the U.K.


According to Apple's most recent regulatory filing, a total of $2.51 billion was spent on R&D operations during the three-month period ending in March, a figure up 31 percent from the same time last year. The outlay comes out to 5 percent of Apple's net sales for the quarter, a significant increase for a company that normally commits around 3 percent to R&D activities.

On a six-month basis, R&D costs hit $4.9 billion, or 3.9 percent of net sales for the period, up 29 percent from $3.8 billion and 2.9 percent of net sales in the year ago quarter. As in years past Apple said the spending escalation was fueled by an increase in hires and "related expenses," including compensation and material costs.

CEO Tim Cook during an investor conference call on Tuesday reconfirmed Apple's commitment to research and development, noting the acquisition of 15 companies over the past year whose assets will be rolled into future products and services.

In addition to R&D, Apple listed capital expenditures at $2.8 billion for the first six months of 2016, up $500 million on a sequential basis. Some $2 billion in cash went toward property, plant and equipment costs, down from $3.6 billion spent in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Of particular interest is a substantial increase in land and building expenses, which now stands at $8.4 billion, up $1.4 billion from the September 2015 quarter.

Last quarter, Apple announced it plans to spend $15 billion over the course of 2016, with moneys going to "product tooling and manufacturing process equipment; data centers; corporate facilities and infrastructure, including information systems hardware, software and enhancements; and retail store facilities."

While the SEC filing did not offer clues as to specific R&D projects, Apple is thought to be pushing hard get its secret automotive offering off the ground. Referred to internally as "Project Titan," the initiative is said to involve over 1,000 employees including a small car lab operating out of in Berlin. Apple was rumored to be courting potential manufacturing partners in Germany, but the company reportedly hit a roadblock recently as talks with BMW and Daimler fell through.

The project is also facing trouble internally. AppleInsider exclusively reported that Apple executives instituted a hiring freeze in January following a sub-par team performance review, just after rumored project lead Steve Zadesky left the company. Titan could be back on track, however, as recent reports note the hires of a former Tesla engineer and prototyping specialists.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.
  • Reply 2 of 19
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,420member
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.
    Yeah, Apple never has any new ideas! /s Whiny entitled tech users are the worst. Cue CK:


    cali
  • Reply 3 of 19
    asdasdasdasd Posts: 5,686member
    They certainly produced more stuff with fewer people. Cooks Apple is bigger but less efficient than under Jobs. 
    SpamSandwichcnocbui
  • Reply 4 of 19
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,096member
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.

    And it boggles the mind why Apple hasn't hired you to get things back on track... *rolls eyes*
    foadcalijbdragonfastasleepbrucemc
  • Reply 5 of 19
    foadfoad Posts: 717member
    asdasd said:
    They certainly produced more stuff with fewer people. Cooks Apple is bigger but less efficient than under Jobs. 
    The scale at which Apple operates right now is literally unheard of in any sector of industry. There is a balance between developing new technology and being able to deliver it at the scale that Apple does. Apple has increased their scale so much since Steve's passing, it's unreal. I also think you are seeing history through rose colored glasses. Apple had plenty of duds and recycled concepts during his tenure.

    It's so easy to dismiss their efforts without actually knowing all that goes into producing something.
    calijbdragonfastasleeppalominejony0badmonk
  • Reply 6 of 19
    irelandireland Posts: 17,798member
    Seriously. If you don't think Apple's goals are to build a car you're positively crazy.
    jbdragonpalominebadmonk
  • Reply 7 of 19
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.
    Recycling designs?You mean the industry standards that everyone else copies?

    Only Apple is expected to innovate. Maybe their next iPhone should be oval shaped.

    the only thing that's changed since the first gen iPhone is the damn color!!!!!!111
  • Reply 8 of 19
    rogifan_newrogifan_new Posts: 4,297member
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.
    Look like you graduated from the troll school called lame.
    jbdragontmaycali
  • Reply 9 of 19
    levilevi Posts: 344member
    Hopefully they didn't spend too much money recycling designs and coming out with the same 'ol stuff but with new colors. It's like they're out of ideas.
    They're following the same pattern they've always followed - development something new and different every 3-7 years, and modify and enhance. Not saying this is the right strategy going forward forever. But perhaps keep this in mind before making generalizations
    cali
  • Reply 10 of 19
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,701member
    ireland said:
    Seriously. If you don't think Apple's goals are to build a car you're positively crazy.
    This guy doesn't

    http://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/
  • Reply 11 of 19
    asdasdasdasd Posts: 5,686member
    foad said:
    asdasd said:
    They certainly produced more stuff with fewer people. Cooks Apple is bigger but less efficient than under Jobs. 
    The scale at which Apple operates right now is literally unheard of in any sector of industry. There is a balance between developing new technology and being able to deliver it at the scale that Apple does. Apple has increased their scale so much since Steve's passing, it's unreal. I also think you are seeing history through rose colored glasses. Apple had plenty of duds and recycled concepts during his tenure.

    It's so easy to dismiss their efforts without actually knowing all that goes into producing something.
    I know how software is produced. You don't need to throw thousands more people at a mature project, it can in fact be counter productive. The scaling part is operations. 

    Also the growth of the iPhone was largely on Jobs' tenure from a few hundred thousand in its first Q to 40M in calendar Q4 2011. This last Q it was 50M. I know one of those was a Christmas and one wasn't but scale is scale. 

    Also iPads hit 15M that Q as opposed to 11 this last Q. 

    The idea that cook scaled up the company so that it is so much larger is a myth. 

    And over spending on R&D is a problem. A small team produced iOS and OS X for years, and the first iPhone and iPad. A much larger team has produced incremental improvements and the watch and tv OS, neither of the lat two have set the world on fire. 
    edited April 2016 cnocbui
  • Reply 12 of 19
    focherfocher Posts: 687member
    asdasd said:
    And over spending on R&D is a problem. A small team produced iOS and OS X for years, and the first iPhone and iPad. A much larger team has produced incremental improvements and the watch and tv OS, neither of the lat two have set the world on fire. 
    That R&D increase is very likely car related, and the actual dollars are not particularly significant as a portion of Apple's revenue. In fact, they spend far less in total dollars than other companies in their sectors. As a percentage of revenue, it's minuscule when compared to the others because they're at a such a bigger revenue scale.

    The other thing is the insinuation that the Apple Watch is a failure. Apple created an entire new line of business that generated $6B in revenue the first year. Exactly what world do people like you live in that consider this a problem?
  • Reply 13 of 19
    ireland said:
    Seriously. If you don't think Apple's goals are to build a car you're positively crazy.
    This guy doesn't

    http://www.radiofreemobile.com/apple-auto-titanic-task/
    Actually, this guy does not think the car will reach day light. Which is different than saying it is not building a car.
  • Reply 14 of 19
    People are so enamor with project titan. Apple is also doing many other things. The idea of doing a few things and doing them well seems to be out of the window. They are doing lots of things and I feel they are not delivering anything that can rival what the iPhone, iPad, and Mac have done in the past, which is generate billions of dollars per year.
  • Reply 15 of 19
    tkell31tkell31 Posts: 216member
    That's a lot of jack to spend to figure out people wanted a bigger phone.   

    What's next?  The iRing?
  • Reply 16 of 19
    red oakred oak Posts: 1,089member
    $2.5B in R&D expenses in one quarter.  Apple needs to start aligning costs with its financial trends.  Luca seems out to lunch.   The company is becoming bloated and slowing down 

    Hypothetically,  even if they had 20K employees making an average of $300K per year, the quarterly expense would be $1.5B.   How do you mathematically even possibly spend $2.5B in R&D?  

    Jobs would rip this apart in 10 mins if he was still alive 
    edited April 2016
  • Reply 17 of 19
    tyler82tyler82 Posts: 1,103member
    Can they just focus on improving iTunes so that it at least reaches the "average" category of usability? 
    singularity
  • Reply 18 of 19
    cnocbuicnocbui Posts: 3,613member
    red oak said:
    $2.5B in R&D expenses in one quarter.  Apple needs to start aligning costs with its financial trends.  Luca seems out to lunch.   The company is becoming bloated and slowing down 

    Hypothetically,  even if they had 20K employees making an average of $300K per year, the quarterly expense would be $1.5B.   How do you mathematically even possibly spend $2.5B in R&D?  

    Jobs would rip this apart in 10 mins if he was still alive 
    Samsung spent $13.8 B on R&D in 2014.  The spend about 9% of sales revenue on R&D PA.

    Apple's spending on R&D has always been very restrained for the sector.
    edited April 2016
  • Reply 19 of 19
    foadfoad Posts: 717member
    asdasd said:
    foad said:
    The scale at which Apple operates right now is literally unheard of in any sector of industry. There is a balance between developing new technology and being able to deliver it at the scale that Apple does. Apple has increased their scale so much since Steve's passing, it's unreal. I also think you are seeing history through rose colored glasses. Apple had plenty of duds and recycled concepts during his tenure.

    It's so easy to dismiss their efforts without actually knowing all that goes into producing something.
    I know how software is produced. You don't need to throw thousands more people at a mature project, it can in fact be counter productive. The scaling part is operations. 

    Also the growth of the iPhone was largely on Jobs' tenure from a few hundred thousand in its first Q to 40M in calendar Q4 2011. This last Q it was 50M. I know one of those was a Christmas and one wasn't but scale is scale. 

    Also iPads hit 15M that Q as opposed to 11 this last Q. 

    The idea that cook scaled up the company so that it is so much larger is a myth. 

    And over spending on R&D is a problem. A small team produced iOS and OS X for years, and the first iPhone and iPad. A much larger team has produced incremental improvements and the watch and tv OS, neither of the lat two have set the world on fire. 
    The most iPhones that Apple sold in a quarter while Jobs was alive was under 40 million (Q4 2011) and well before that time he was very ill. Tim & Jeff Williams were instrumental of that even being possible. The most they have sold while Tim has permanently been CEO is almost 75 million. No one else in the industry is operating at the scale. Samsung sells a lot of phones but most aren't at the quality and consistency of what Apple is doing. Scaling operations is insanely difficult.

    As far as software goes, the initial releases of iOS and OS X lacked so many of the features that exist now and ran on a smaller mix of hardware, so of course they would require smaller teams. Let's not forget the disasters that were .Mac and MobileMe, or not getting the first white iPhone out for a long time. As for watchOS and tvOS, they are selling at faster clips that the iPhone did year 1 and the previous Apple TV, respectively. Beyond that, we have no idea how large the software teams are. From speaking to the folks I know there, they still have relatively small teams and the watch team actually operates a bit independently.

    If anything, I don't think we can even compare their efficiencies. Apple is a much larger company, with exponentially more customers, active devices and a larger product range that tailors to a broader range of people then when Jobs was alive. Most of that growth has been since Jobs passed.
Sign In or Register to comment.