I/O 2016: Google's new Home hardware takes on Apple's HomeKit and Siri
The smart home battle between Apple, Google and others continues to heat up, with Google on Wednesday announcing Home, a new voice-activated hardware kit that brings the Google assistant service to any room in your house.
Like Amazon Echo, Google Home is an always-listening piece of hardware that allows users to issue commands using natural language. The hardware will launch later this year, though Google has yet to announce a price.
Demonstrated by Google at its annual I/O conference, Home allows users to control connected devices in their home, get answers from Google, stream music, and more.
The hardware itself is a small speaker, with swappable exterior shells that can be chosen to match a home's decor. And because it's always plugged in, Google Home is capable of pumping out room-filling sound for music and voice feedback.
Home is also designed with multi-room support, allowing users to own multiple hardware units and place them throughout their house. And it'll play nice with Chromecast, allowing users to rely on just their voice to queue up content on an HDTV.
Like Amazon Echo, Google Home is an always-listening piece of hardware that allows users to issue commands using natural language. The hardware will launch later this year, though Google has yet to announce a price.
Demonstrated by Google at its annual I/O conference, Home allows users to control connected devices in their home, get answers from Google, stream music, and more.
The hardware itself is a small speaker, with swappable exterior shells that can be chosen to match a home's decor. And because it's always plugged in, Google Home is capable of pumping out room-filling sound for music and voice feedback.
Home is also designed with multi-room support, allowing users to own multiple hardware units and place them throughout their house. And it'll play nice with Chromecast, allowing users to rely on just their voice to queue up content on an HDTV.
Comments
I have an Amazon Echo here, loving it.
I do think iPhone is a better hub since it's always with you and not in another room, but how much progress has HomeKit really accomplished? Apple TV was certainly lacking a ton of features and opportunities.
And where's the Home app?
HealthKit/Health
HomeKit/Home.
i figured we would get Home at least by iOS 9.
Isn't that handy...
And who do you think to blame?
Tim should be out.
A few months ago they had a home automation guy on CNBC and he said we are still 5 years away from it becoming mainstream and for the technology to advance. I'm sure Apple knows the addressable market.
I've been watching The Google I/O keynote.
Trying my best to be objective, here. but I haven't seen anything compelling or show-stopping.
The Home, Allo, Duo and wearable offerings were nice but not really new and not available until the fall.
The thing that really is off-putting is that most of these things require the latest Google/Android software and, historically, very few available Google/Android devices are running the latest software.
Yes, this is a good point. We techies are likely the vocal minority, thinking that the mass market is ready for such tech. It's probably slightly premature.
Apple could have made Apple TV a smart home hub with zigbee and zwave support and a control app on your phone and it would have likely crushed nearly all of the other smart home systems out there and placed Apple in control of a large portion of the smart home market and collected billions in "Made for Apple Home" licensing fees.
"And everybody here gets a beta copy TODAY!" "Release to general public to take place in Fall of 2017"
...And the crowd goes wild!!