Congress won't consider mandatory encryption bill after Apple battle - report

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 22
    ericthehalfbeeericthehalfbee Posts: 4,486member
    Chipsy4 said:
    There's no secure enclave in the processors Android phones use.


    Yes there is. Apple's secure enclave is just Apple's implementation of ARM's Trustzone. Something high end Android phones have been using for a while now.


    No. Similar, but not the same. That's like saying the A7-A9 cores are just Apples version of an ARM A57 core.

    And Android phones, even high-end ones, are still stuck using software encryption.

    Apple is way ahead of Android in these areas. It's not even close. 
    badmonk
  • Reply 22 of 22
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,212member
    Chipsy4 said:
    There's no secure enclave in the processors Android phones use.


    Yes there is. Apple's secure enclave is just Apple's implementation of ARM's Trustzone. Something high end Android phones have been using for a while now.


    No. Similar, but not the same. That's like saying the A7-A9 cores are just Apples version of an ARM A57 core.

    And Android phones, even high-end ones, are still stuck using software encryption.

    Apple is way ahead of Android in these areas. It's not even close. 
    For 98% (my guess) of users with higher-end phones the difference has no practical effect security-wise IMHO. Would you disagree?

    On a side but related note have you ever had a situation where encryption benefitted you? I realize it's like insurance and we should all have it, but if not you has anyone you know personally been impacted by not having it active on their smart-device? This really is a serious question so if we could avoid making it into anything offensive as it's not meant to be. 
    edited May 2016
Sign In or Register to comment.