Actually that deal STOPS Iran's weapons plans. But thanks for playing.
Of course if Apple wanted to go that judgmental route there's a lot of American states they'd have to stop selling in eh? Awkward.
It was just revealed officially that Iran can have a weapon rather quickly under the deal. Your godking lied to you again.
Huh? Who revealed what officially? And please, only mainstream sites, not Breitbart, NewsMax or Stormfront. You can even quote from defense and military specific rags.
Why is it that people always want sources (instead of looking it up for themselves), when its something they don't want to hear?
It's almost as if this were a textbook human reaction or something...
actually no, its very common (and codified on some sites, i believe MR is one) that the person making a claim bears the burden for backing it up as anything other than their own personal or shared delusions. the burden of proof lies with the claimer.
IOW, "Links, or it didn't happen"
Agree, why isn't this obvious to people? We're not talking MLA/APA citation format , just post the link, even if you went to the "school of hard knocks" or "life university" it's pretty easy to figure out.
latest news : Iran say apple must change it's name because otherwise will be accused of promoting Christianity and devil worship due to Adam and Eve story ! sic
So Apple refused to supply technology and support for the RNC but might set up shop in one of the most repressive regimes on the planet?
They gave the RNC support, just not the Trump campaign. He called for a boycott of Apple products, so Trump got what he explicitly asked for.
It it was the right move for Apple. Even better move would be to not give anything to Republicans or the moronic Democrats (extra emphasis because they are much more fun to mock and ironically way more superstitious about their bullshit).
Here's your original fear-mongering, dog-whistle statement:
"It was just revealed officially that Iran can have a weapon rather quickly under the deal. Your godking lied to you again."
The very unofficial reveal from the AP, citing the foreign minister and two unnamed sources, says that Iran can start buying more efficient centrifuges in ten, maybe fifteen years — it's written so badly you can't tell which.
At that time, if there's still a need for increased amounts of enriched uranium in this world, Iran's progressive, internationalist government (which would reflect the majority of the cosmopolitan Iranian people) may decide to turn up the processing to match the rest of the developed world. Or not.
Or maybe they'll still be stuck with an aggressive geopolitical outlaw government like the one we have. In which case, you'd have something to worry about in 2026 or 2031.
Here's your original fear-mongering, dog-whistle statement:
"It was just revealed officially that Iran can have a weapon rather quickly under the deal. Your godking lied to you again."
The very unofficial reveal from the AP, citing the foreign minister and two unnamed sources, says that Iran can start buying more efficient centrifuges in ten, maybe fifteen years — it's written so badly you can't tell which.
At that time, if there's still a need for increased amounts of enriched uranium in this world, Iran's progressive, internationalist government (which would reflect the majority of the cosmopolitan Iranian people) may decide to turn up the processing to match the rest of the developed world. Or not.
Or maybe they'll still be stuck with an aggressive geopolitical outlaw government like the one we have. In which case, you'd have something to worry about in 2026 or 2031.
Stanch (v.): to check or stop the flowing of (stanched her tears), esp. to stop the flow of blood from (a wound) Staunch (adj.): devoted or loyal to a person, belief, or cause; water tight, sound
Comments
Indeed. Obama's deal will go down as the worst and most disastrous deal in history. What an evil, little man.
I fully understand why the person portraying Satan in the Bible miniseries resembled Obama.
Agree, why isn't this obvious to people? We're not talking MLA/APA citation format , just post the link, even if you went to the "school of hard knocks" or "life university" it's pretty easy to figure out.
Yeah, Iran gov can go pound sand dunes. Are they really going to confiscate all those iPhones used by Iranian government officials and Mullahs?
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAN_NUCLEAR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-07-18-14-12-14
Nuclear energy program + Iran's existing missile program = everything you need for nuclear ballistic weapons.
It it was the right move for Apple. Even better move would be to not give anything to Republicans or the moronic Democrats (extra emphasis because they are much more fun to mock and ironically way more superstitious about their bullshit).
"It was just revealed officially that Iran can have a weapon rather quickly under the deal. Your godking lied to you again."
The very unofficial reveal from the AP, citing the foreign minister and two unnamed sources, says that Iran can start buying more efficient centrifuges in ten, maybe fifteen years — it's written so badly you can't tell which.
At that time, if there's still a need for increased amounts of enriched uranium in this world, Iran's progressive, internationalist government (which would reflect the majority of the cosmopolitan Iranian people) may decide to turn up the processing to match the rest of the developed world. Or not.
Or maybe they'll still be stuck with an aggressive geopolitical outlaw government like the one we have. In which case, you'd have something to worry about in 2026 or 2031.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/staunch