Apple Watch Series 2 sees strong demand from upgraders, millennials

Posted:
in Apple Watch
According to fresh statistics released Tuesday, a sizable chunk of Apple Watch Series 2 pre-orders went to customers who own the original Apple Watch, while millennials replaced Gen X as the largest buyer demographic.




Drawing findings from a panel of online shoppers who pre-ordered Apple Watch Series 2 from Sept. 9 through Sept. 12, Slice Intelligence reports nearly one-third of customers previously purchased Apple's original model. The figures are important for the fledgling wearable, as brand loyalty often determines whether or not a bleeding edge tech product finds traction from a wider consumer base.

In a shift to Apple Watch's customer demographic, millennials were the largest pre-order group over the four day sample period, accounting for some 39 percent of initial Series 2 purchases. Millennials take over for Gen X buyers, the largest buying group during the pre-order period of the first Apple Watch model last year, the firm says.

Interestingly, while Series 2 pre-order customers were predominantly men, the device saw a 6 percent uptick in women buyers compared to last year's original device. Specifically, women accounted for 26 percent of pre-orders, up from 20 percent with the original Apple Watch.

Echoing a trend set last year, early adopters appear to be gravitating toward larger Series 2 model, with 66.6 percent of buyers opting for the 42mm version instead of 38mm variants.

Diving deeper into Slice's pre-order statistics, 69.8 percent of buyers opted for the sport band configuration, 54.2 percent of whom chose black as their preferred color. Customers looking for woven nylon bands were also partial to black, with 46.2 percent of buyers selecting that particular setup. The penchant for black bands mirrors last year's pre-order cycle.

Apple announced Apple Watch Series 2 at a special event earlier this month. The wearable is aesthetically similar to its predecessor, but contains a raft of internal improvements including a faster dual-core processor, GPS radio, brighter display, larger battery and water resistance down to 50 meters.

Pricing starts at $369 for a 38mm aluminum version and moves up to $1,299 for the new 42mm white ceramic edition.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 30
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    I think Apple's decision to withhold sales figures for the original Watch was a stroke of genius. It left the pundits and talking heads desperate for something to talk about so they dutifully turned to non scientific surveys and prognostications. The result is you can take all these reports with a grain of salt. Believe what you want because no one can prove anything. Now Apple is doing the same thing with the iPhone by not releasing sales figures for the first weekend of sales. The result? More blathering nonsense from the tech press, even if it happens to be positive. I'm enjoying this.
    radster360nolamacguymacxpressrevolutionfastasleepbuckalecbrucemcGeorgeBMacpscooter63gilly017
  • Reply 2 of 30
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Wasn't Apple Watch the 2nd most profitable wrist-worn device company for the entire 2015 year, just behind Rolex's large group, despite only 8 months on the market? Imagine what 2016 will be. I suspect that Apple Watch will do the same as it has to the PC, PMP, cellphone, and tablet market—take nearly all the profits.
    redraider11anantksundarambrucemcmagman1979netmagepscooter63
  • Reply 3 of 30
    This is despite basically every podcast and website recommending you not upgrade because it's not worth it. (I know most people don't listen or read the same things I do) 
    gilly017
  • Reply 4 of 30
    Some people are just born dumb and never learn.

    The Apple Watch is doing great. Let the clueless crowd keep guessing. I like that Apple is not releasing any figures. I've read that some people and media have already declared the Apple Watch to be a flop. How wrong can a person be?

    And before that, these were probably the same stupid fuckers that declared the iPhone to be a flop when it was first released, and then the iPad after that. If their lives depended on their intelligence and their ability to accurately predict anything, they'd all be dead a long time ago. They wouldn't survive for 5 minutes. 

    The Apple Watch is still in the early stages, it's only on revision 2. How long did it take the iPhone to fully mature, or the iPad? The Apple Watch 2 seems to be a pretty good upgrade.

    Apple is on the right track with the Apple Watch, and it's only number 2 in the line.

    Imagine what the future holds, unless you're one of those clueless naysayers of course, in which case, you have no imagination, you're constantly wrong, your brain is probably underdeveloped, and you're wrong about the Apple Watch, just like you were wrong about the iPhone, the iPad and everything else that is Apple related. How does it feel to be so stupid and such a loser?

    watto_cobraDeelronradster360lkrupprevolutionalbegarcanantksundaramnetmagemonstrositypscooter63
  • Reply 5 of 30
    If you are under the age of 17 years old there is a good chance the only type of watch you will ever own will be a smartwatch, so this market has endless growth. The people writing the doom and gloom Apple Watch articles can't see the forest from the trees.

    I was waiting for built in GPS to buy one and it's finally here. Can't wait to get one. The rebranding with a focus on fitness is a great move! This will definitely have the "I want one too" effect when your friends see what it's capable of.

    Will be top selling Holiday gift of 2016. I'm buying one for myself and my 13 year old nephew one (he wants one).
    edited September 2016 Deelronmagman1979GeorgeBMacrazorpitgilly017
  • Reply 6 of 30
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    apple ][ said:
    Some people are just born dumb and never learn.

    The Apple Watch is doing great. Let the clueless crowd keep guessing. I like that Apple is not releasing any figures. I've read that some people and media have already declared the Apple Watch to be a flop. How wrong can a person be?

    And before that, these were probably the same stupid fuckers that declared the iPhone to be a flop when it was first released, and then the iPad after that. If their lives depended on their intelligence and their ability to accurately predict anything, they'd all be dead a long time ago. They wouldn't survive for 5 minutes. 

    The Apple Watch is still in the early stages, it's only on revision 2. How long did it take the iPhone to fully mature, or the iPad? The Apple Watch 2 seems to be a pretty good upgrade.

    Apple is on the right track with the Apple Watch, and it's only number 2 in the line.

    Imagine what the future holds, unless you're one of those clueless naysayers of course, in which case, you have no imagination, you're constantly wrong, your brain is probably underdeveloped, and you're wrong about the Apple Watch, just like you were wrong about the iPhone, the iPad and everything else that is Apple related. How does it feel to be so stupid and such a loser?

    iPad 2 sold in record numbers. Probably the fastest selling tech product in history.

    Series 2 hype has been mostly dead from my observations. Let's hope it sells. I want it to be the new iPod.
    edited September 2016
  • Reply 7 of 30
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Interesting note about the Series 2 teardown. It seems like there are a lot of air pockets inside. I would have though the design would have been tighter.
  • Reply 8 of 30
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Hey, @cali, how about them Apples?¡
  • Reply 9 of 30
    levilevi Posts: 344member
    lkrupp said:
    I think Apple's decision to withhold sales figures for the original Watch was a stroke of genius. It left the pundits and talking heads desperate for something to talk about so they dutifully turned to non scientific surveys and prognostications. The result is you can take all these reports with a grain of salt. Believe what you want because no one can prove anything. Now Apple is doing the same thing with the iPhone by not releasing sales figures for the first weekend of sales. The result? More blathering nonsense from the tech press, even if it happens to be positive. I'm enjoying this.
    I think they're tired of the narrative that Apple must sell x number of units a y growth rate or it's a failure. Analysts and the market as a whole has been punishing Apple for transparency is this regard. As a shareholder I'm happy to see the change.
    macxpressjax44brucemcDeelronGeorgeBMacpscooter63gilly017
  • Reply 10 of 30
    One driver for the 18 - 22 year old college students would be having it linked to college services.  E.g.:
    • Paying at the student store, linked to some student account.
    • Entry to your college dorm (using NFC)
    • Alert notification for campus-wide info (e.g., approaching storm, police action, etc.)
    Kids don't necessarily want a WATCH, but they may want wrist-mounted convenience.


    gilly017
  • Reply 11 of 30
    What are Gen X and Millennials? I don't know the difference. I'm an almost 70 Baby Boomer born at the beginning of 1947. Had original Space Gray WATCH since April 2015. Now going Gold Coffee Series 2. Love being the first to die with an WATCH on my wrist.
    GeorgeBMacwatto_cobragilly017freshmaker
  • Reply 12 of 30
    Soli said:
    Wasn't Apple Watch the 2nd most profitable wrist-worn device company for the entire 2015 year, just behind Rolex's large group, despite only 8 months on the market? Imagine what 2016 will be. I suspect that Apple Watch will do the same as it has to the PC, PMP, cellphone, and tablet market—take nearly all the profits.
    I think he said it was the second-highest selling watch after Rolex. I wouldn't be surprised if it's already the world's most profitable watch maker!

    And, as you say, it won't be too long before Apple has a gargantuan share of industry profits too. I feel really quite badly for the watches in the $250 - $2,000 range. I think their days may be numbered. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 30
    brucemcbrucemc Posts: 1,541member
    levi said:
    lkrupp said:
    I think Apple's decision to withhold sales figures for the original Watch was a stroke of genius. It left the pundits and talking heads desperate for something to talk about so they dutifully turned to non scientific surveys and prognostications. The result is you can take all these reports with a grain of salt. Believe what you want because no one can prove anything. Now Apple is doing the same thing with the iPhone by not releasing sales figures for the first weekend of sales. The result? More blathering nonsense from the tech press, even if it happens to be positive. I'm enjoying this.
    I think they're tired of the narrative that Apple must sell x number of units a y growth rate or it's a failure. Analysts and the market as a whole has been punishing Apple for transparency is this regard. As a shareholder I'm happy to see the change.
    Agree. Apple has been for decades one of, if not the most, transparent companies in terms of reporting sales metrics. However, in the new media / blogger / social era, it was only being used by media and analysts to craft negative narratives, regardless of overall company performance.  And was giving competition more information than necessary. Reduce the reporting to a few key metrics, inline with the industry at large. 

    Not knowing the Apple Watch sales has no doubt caused uncertainty regarding the market to competitors, and that may keep them from investing as heavily. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 30
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Soli said:
    Wasn't Apple Watch the 2nd most profitable wrist-worn device company for the entire 2015 year, just behind Rolex's large group, despite only 8 months on the market? Imagine what 2016 will be. I suspect that Apple Watch will do the same as it has to the PC, PMP, cellphone, and tablet market—take nearly all the profits.
    And, as you say, it won't be too long before Apple has a gargantuan share of industry profits too. I feel really quite badly for the watches in the $250 - $2,000 range. I think their days may be numbered. 
    There will be the collector watches in the mid to high price ranges, and there will be the excessive number of near zero-cost digital watches that get made per year, but I think Apple had this in the bad before they ever sold a single Watch; and while we can argue that they made mistakes in the SW as we saw some radical changes from v1 to v2, and v2 to v3, in just over a year, I think they nailed key aspects of the HW that will let them build off this foundation for many years to come. Unlike with the 30-pin connector eventually being too big and archaic for future iDevices, I don't see a reason for Apple to change how their straps connect to the device, so pretty much everything else can be molded to fit their next evolution of the Apple Watch.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 30
    brucemcbrucemc Posts: 1,541member

    NY1822 said:
    If you are under the age of 17 years old there is a good chance the only type of watch you will ever own will be a smartwatch, so this market has endless growth. The people writing the doom and gloom Apple Watch articles can't see the forest from the trees.

    I was waiting for built in GPS to buy one and it's finally here. Can't wait to get one. The rebranding with a focus on fitness is a great move! This will definitely have the "I want one too" effect when your friends see what it's capable of.

    Will be top selling Holiday gift of 2016. I'm buying one for myself and my 13 year old nephew one (he wants one).
    At the high level, the wearables market could be as large as the smartphone market, if not more. One for every person (but could be multiple, like health bands, ear pieces / headphones, ...), and the same models can be sold globally.  A long way to go, as the market is just getting started, but good potential. Very interested to see where Apple takes this over the next 3-5 years. 
    GeorgeBMacpscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 30
    Good god not Slice Intelligence again.  :# the only data I trust is from Apple.
  • Reply 17 of 30
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    brucemc said:

    NY1822 said:
    If you are under the age of 17 years old there is a good chance the only type of watch you will ever own will be a smartwatch, so this market has endless growth. The people writing the doom and gloom Apple Watch articles can't see the forest from the trees.

    I was waiting for built in GPS to buy one and it's finally here. Can't wait to get one. The rebranding with a focus on fitness is a great move! This will definitely have the "I want one too" effect when your friends see what it's capable of.

    Will be top selling Holiday gift of 2016. I'm buying one for myself and my 13 year old nephew one (he wants one).
    At the high level, the wearables market could be as large as the smartphone market, if not more. One for every person (but could be multiple, like health bands, ear pieces / headphones, ...), and the same models can be sold globally.  A long way to go, as the market is just getting started, but good potential. Very interested to see where Apple takes this over the next 3-5 years. 
    I've long counted headphones as wearables. Sure, they are simple electronic devices that we wear, but even within their single-use functionality—or multi-use functionality if you count volume controls, a microphone for voice calls, microphones for noice canceling—they can be quite complex. Think of it as an early step toward a rich and complex wearable the way anti-lock breaks, and automatic transmission, on-baord computers, and cruise control are all necessary first steps in an intelligent automobile before we could ever get to a truly self-driving/autopilot or driver-less automobile.

    Apple's AirPods with the W1 chip has a lot of potential. Personally, I'd like to see headphones begin to use biometrics to help the Watch and iPhone gather data more effectively. Right now, it's as simple as an IR sensor to know when it's in or out of your ear (or likely being placed against an object), but in the future it could take your temperature as you exercise (we've had IR ear thermometers for decades), use the accelerometers in each ear piece plus your Watch and/or iPhone to get a better idea of how you run and when you're most exhausted based on balance and stride, and countless other things I can't possibly imagine. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 30

    A few months back I was seriously thinking of looking into some water-proof covers for the Apple Watch to take it swimming. I never thought it would be as soon as v2 that Apple would allow swimming with the Watch!

    Series 2 is a no-brainer for me, but I also want something different so I'm holding out for the Nike version.

    magman1979watto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 30
    The emergency alert feature is reason enough for some people to buy it...and want there children to have it
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 30
    brucemc sai ...
    ...  A long way to go, as the market is just getting started, but good potential. Very interested to see where Apple takes this over the next 3-5 years. 
    I would look beyond 3-5 years.   That will be the growth and maturing window.

    But the smart watch opens up the same window for miniaturization that the PC world experienced through the 80's & 90's.  At some point, the capabilities of the smart watch will begin to rival those of the smart phone and be limited only by screen size...  That is:  you won't be able to do FaceBook or email on a smart watch (not easily or effectively).  But, will you want to lug around smart phone just for those?

    We started with room sized mainframes which progressed to 40 pound desktops which progressed to 5 pound laptops which progressed to pocket sized smart phones which is progressing to wrist sized smart watches....
Sign In or Register to comment.