Review: Master & Dynamic MW60 Wireless Over-Ear Headphones

in General Discussion edited January 26
Master & Dynamic's top-of-the-line Bluetooth headphones deliver on style, build, and sound quality, but are almost certainly overkill -- especially if you intend to take them outside.

In an age when people are increasingly turning to earbuds, sometimes completely wireless ones, the MW60s feel almost like a deliberate step backward. They're noticeably bulky and heavy, with an over-the-ear design constructed primarily out of stainless steel. While they do collapse for storage (a pouch is included), portability seems to be a secondary concern.

Fashion seems to be the byword, in fact. Each line and surface feels meticulous, and the headband is made of genuine cowhide leather, while the earpads are made out of lambskin. These materials are very comfortable, but ultimately just a luxury -- and obviously, people opposed to animal products need not apply.

Thankfully though, it's not a matter of style over substance. Steel is incredibly tough, and in the audio department the MW60s are some of the best-sounding headphones we've ever heard.

A recurring thought we had during testing was that we were hearing the best-possible versions of every recording -- at least as far as Bluetooth allows. Voices were clearer than ever, and bass was punchy without overstepping the rest of the frequency range. In truth there are probably more expensive headphones with even better performance, but buying those seems gratuitous, considering the limits of Bluetooth quality.

M&D claims that the MW60s have 16 hours of battery life. That seemed to bear out in practice, since after several hour-plus listening sessions over more than a week, iOS still reported the MW60s as having 100 percent charge. Inaccurate, obviously, but still suggestive that we were barely making a dent. The real issue is whether the headphones will retain that stamina a year, two years, or five years from now.

Another impressive technical aspect though was Bluetooth signal range. In theory the MW60s' aluminum antenna should extend connections up to 100 feet, triple what most Bluetooth devices are capable of. That might be stretching it, but we were able to get clean audio in most parts of a small- to medium-sized gym while leaving our iPhone in our bag. It was only at the fringes of the gym -- or, in rare cases, if we covered the antenna with our hand -- that signal started cutting out too often.

Wearing the headphones during a workout is otherwise a bad idea, as you might expect. They weigh over three quarters of a pound, which means that even with their tight fit, they can still start to slide off if you bend over too far. The earpads and headband get hot and sweaty in a hurry, and they're actually the opposite of stylish when matched with gym clothes.

A small shout-out is deserved for the on-cup playback and pairing controls. It took just a few minutes to get used to them, and the size and positioning of the play/pause button made it easy to locate the volume/track skip controls by touch.


As much as we loved the MW60s under most circumstances -- we're giving them a high rating -- you probably shouldn't buy them unless money is no object (which it probably is, naturally).

Why? They're $549. That's a lot to ask for Bluetooth headphones, especially ones that don't have any noise cancellation and are too heavy for anything but sitting or walking.

Bluetooth is about convenience, not fidelity. If you're genuinely interested in a perfect listening experience, you might as well get wired-only headphones, whether using a Lightning cable or a 3.5-millimeter connection. Yes, you can hook a bundled 3.5-millimeter cable into the MW60s -- but then, why pay for the wireless functions?

Score: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy:

The MW60s are available from Master & Dynamic and for $549.


  • Reply 1 of 11
    irelandireland Posts: 17,751member
    Price should affect your reviews more, guys.
  • Reply 2 of 11
    I didn't like the sound and sold them. But as always, this a question of taste.
  • Reply 3 of 11
    Rayz2016Rayz2016 Posts: 6,957member
    ireland said:
    Price should affect your reviews more, guys.
    I don't think it should. You state the price and then people should decide for themselves if they're worth it or not based on the review and their listening habits. 
  • Reply 4 of 11
    irelandireland Posts: 17,751member
    Rayz2016 said:
    ireland said:
    Price should affect your reviews more, guys.
    I don't think it should. You state the price and then people should decide for themselves if they're worth it or not based on the review and their listening habits. 
    If headphones that cost say $5,000 and are roughly equivalent in quality to headphones in quality that cost $300 price should be the differentiating factor in the rating.  Therefore price should affect the star rating. In a capitalist society technology product reviews should be subjected to their capital expenditure.
    edited November 2016
  • Reply 5 of 11
    One of the problems with a single, composite scoring system is the lack of granularity. Without a scoring on multiple facets of a product it becomes almost impossible to differentiate between similar products. If my needs/wants are not the same as the reviewers it makes it almost impossible to make an "informed" choice.
  • Reply 6 of 11
    Review metrics aside, these are pretty ugly.
  • Reply 7 of 11
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,454member
    You pay for wireless capabilities for the option and ability to disconnect and use them wirelessly when need be. Wireless isn't just about working out, it's about being able to get up and walk across the room without your program being interrupted, or dragging a long extension around the room. If the iPhone 7 is any indication of a future to come, I can imagine most headphones will be wireless once the price has dropped enough, and wired use will be optional. But as nice as these are, I can't imagine anyone shelling out this kind of cash for BT, knowing BT 5 is just around the corner, and as an Apple user, I can't see ever buying another pair of headphones without a W1 chip. And how do these charge? Micro-USB? So another cable I have to drag around as well?
  • Reply 8 of 11
    boredumbboredumb Posts: 1,418member
    ireland said:
    Price should affect your reviews more, guys.
    Accuracy would be good, the moment, they are $399.99 at Amazon.
  • Reply 9 of 11
    Roger_FingasRoger_Fingas Posts: 148member, editor
    boredumb said:
    ireland said:
    Price should affect your reviews more, guys.
    Accuracy would be good, the moment, they are $399.99 at Amazon.
    Please note that prices are subject to change, especially around Black Friday and Cyber Monday.
  • Reply 10 of 11
    NoontecMikeNoontecMike Posts: 1unconfirmed, member
    Nice review! Hope to read your more review about headphones.  :)
  • Reply 11 of 11
    Z0mb4yZ0mb4y Posts: 1unconfirmed, member
    Wouldn't recommend these headphones or this company to anyone. The connection pin that attaches the earpiece to the frame broke on my MW60 after only a month of use, so I sent them in three months ago, but I haven't gotten them back since. If I try to talk to them they either ignore my emails, or make up some kind of different excuse every time. For TWO MONTHS they told me that they were having problems with shipments due to the holidays. Now (three months after receiving my headphones) what they're telling me after promising to send the replacement headphones, but not doing so for multiple times they're saying that they weren't able to 'due to a recent system update'. So basically if you buy these headphones and there's anything wrong with them they'll have you send back the headphones to scam you your 600$ and there is noting you can do about it.
Sign In or Register to comment.