Unicode committee to meet at Apple campus, discuss addition of redhead emoji
Unicode Technical Committee members will meet at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., next week to discuss the addition of new emoji or modifiers that would introduce redhead characters in a future iteration of the standard.
Announced on Thursday by the Unicode Consortium, the upcoming committee meeting will decide how best to implement emoji characters with red hair, a highly requested representation that is gaining support among users, according to Emojipedia. In fact, the dearth of redhead emoji has been the most frequent complaint to the publication over the past three months.
An Emoji Subcommittee proposal (PDF link) regarding potential solutions has been drafted and will serve as a jumping off point at the conference next week.
The document describes a number of possibilities, including the creation of an entirely new "person with red hair" emoji, a skin tone modifier, a tag mechanism to change hair color independent of skin tone, displaying an existing blond character with strawberry blond hair and zero-width joiner (ZWJ) sequences for hair color. The latter ZWJ sequence solution describes non-printing characters that can be used to modify or join two emoji together to form a new character, for example "woman" and "red hair."
Redhead emoji are not guaranteed. As noted by the publication, redheads make up only 1 to 2 percent of the world's population, making it difficult to justify work on a major character addition or modification. The meeting next week will help decide whether the red hair project moves forward.
Given Unicode 10 is mere months away from release, redhead emoji are unlikely to appear in a new platform build until at least 2018.
Apple is traditionally one of the first major smartphone manufacturers to implement new emoji in its iOS operating system, and consistently suggests improvements for the standard.
In December, for example, Apple gave iPhone and iPad users access to dozens of new and redesigned characters with the release of iOS 10.2.
Announced on Thursday by the Unicode Consortium, the upcoming committee meeting will decide how best to implement emoji characters with red hair, a highly requested representation that is gaining support among users, according to Emojipedia. In fact, the dearth of redhead emoji has been the most frequent complaint to the publication over the past three months.
An Emoji Subcommittee proposal (PDF link) regarding potential solutions has been drafted and will serve as a jumping off point at the conference next week.
The document describes a number of possibilities, including the creation of an entirely new "person with red hair" emoji, a skin tone modifier, a tag mechanism to change hair color independent of skin tone, displaying an existing blond character with strawberry blond hair and zero-width joiner (ZWJ) sequences for hair color. The latter ZWJ sequence solution describes non-printing characters that can be used to modify or join two emoji together to form a new character, for example "woman" and "red hair."
Redhead emoji are not guaranteed. As noted by the publication, redheads make up only 1 to 2 percent of the world's population, making it difficult to justify work on a major character addition or modification. The meeting next week will help decide whether the red hair project moves forward.
Given Unicode 10 is mere months away from release, redhead emoji are unlikely to appear in a new platform build until at least 2018.
Apple is traditionally one of the first major smartphone manufacturers to implement new emoji in its iOS operating system, and consistently suggests improvements for the standard.
In December, for example, Apple gave iPhone and iPad users access to dozens of new and redesigned characters with the release of iOS 10.2.
Comments
What's next: rare steak, medium rare steak, well done steak? Chicken noodle, clam chowder, and menudo soup? Ten different dog breeds?
I'm all for diversity. I'm progressive to the point of being a constitutional-republic-socialist. The nature of emoji having human faces invites us to consider diversity so that it represents all of its users. Ok. That's fine and good.
The bad part: The nature of the tool has changed to where it's stopped being a tool for communication and started being a decorative device. It's turning into an existence for its own sake, like when a hoarder fills their house with things they'll never use, just in case.
It seems entirely focused on its own growth. More shapes, more objects, more foods, more faces!!! It's like companies that lose their way once they go public, or activist groups that turn into self-perpetuating monolithic institutions that spend more time and money managing their mere existence than acting on their original mission...
It's difficult to know where to stop, but a standards organization is really supposed to be expert at exactly that. I've never seen a standard get revised as frequently as emoji. That is itself an indicator of bad standard management.
PS: I love redheads. And yes, those emoji aren't red. They're carrot orange. But that's actually what real redheads look like. There's variation, but "fire engine red" is dyed hair.
And a serious question, as I look at the pictures (please attribute it to ignorance on my part, and nothing more): are there dark-complexioned people with (natural) red hair? Where?