Daniel, rather than mentioning some article at the Verge why wouldn't you tell us who Google themselves said the Chromebook Pixels were for? I think I know why.
Your argument is familiar because you repeat it often. Essentially: Google doesn't intent to be successful in any area it fails in, and paid $15 billion for two hardware companies because it was planning to fail and just wanted to give licensees ideas they could implement on their own, even though those licensees were failing before, during and after Google's $$$, years long efforts went nowhere. But that's ridiculous and not supported by facts.
Oh I see the problem. You're imagining I was the one explaining why Google built the Chromebook Pixel and who the intended audience was. You just didn't understand that was what Google said all-along, from the very get-go in 2013. No problem then, you simply misunderstood the source. I still think you really should have known tho as much as you seem to research stuff.
Comments