??? sneak peek

2

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 57
    Just out of curiosity, how do the static elements of VB work? i.e. the pulldown menus, color settings, font settings. . .
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 57
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    Pulldown menus are whatever the browser you use has...unless they have custom ones that aren't showing in OmniWeb.



    As for the colors and whatnot...well I hope that users cannot select their own color...not that I think conformity is always a good thing but when I'm reading a thread I like it all one color/size/font.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by groverat:

    <strong>Hooray for Futura.</strong><hr></blockquote>I think you missed the memo. That's not futura. That's Adobe Myriad, the same font Apple's adopting for its newer logos and graphics (starting with the eMac name, IIRC).

    [quote]Originally posted by Splinemodel:

    <strong>Just out of curiosity, how do the static elements of VB work?</strong><hr></blockquote>Like magic!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 57
    trevormtrevorm Posts: 841member
    Well done guys:



    That looks really good.

    Nice and fresh looking



    I look foward to the conversion

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 57
    nebagakidnebagakid Posts: 2,692member
    s'good, but i do not like the rows of options above a post:



    like, i just want "edit" and "reply"
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 57
    Looks Cool!



    Although it would be nice to have FUNCTIONAL "Speed Holes." It's just a design element without a purpose... that's not good design. Who am I kidding though? This is an Apple related site- form over function right?



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by Nebagakid:

    <strong>i do not like the rows of options above a post</strong><hr></blockquote>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 28 of 57
    jrcjrc Posts: 817member
    I prefer all text.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 29 of 57
    nebagakidnebagakid Posts: 2,692member
    [quote]Originally posted by Brad:

    <strong></strong><hr></blockquote>



    aw damn! <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />



    time to fumar your *ss, golfa!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 30 of 57
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    Yuck, you want a shite bbs?



    Sick ****.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 31 of 57
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    I think it looks fine.



    I look forward to a effortless transition to the new 'board. I've bookmarked the direct addresses of the various forums and never come in throught the main domain name. I suppose I'll know when the new 'board is up because my links will no longer function....correct?



    Did I miss when the ETA of this upgrade is set to debut?



    D
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 32 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by drewprops:

    <strong>I've bookmarked the direct addresses of the various forums and never come in throught the main domain name.</strong><hr></blockquote>You're kidding, no?



    <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/"; target="_blank">http://www.appleinsider.com/</a>;

    <a href="http://forums.appleinsider.com/"; target="_blank">http://forums.appleinsider.com/</a>;



    Keep one of these bookmarked because we also sometimes post announcements on the front page. Yes, your bookmarks to the individual forums will break.

    [quote]<strong>Did I miss when the ETA of this upgrade is set to debut?</strong><hr></blockquote>December 13th. Or maybe April 15th. At the latest, July 29th.



    [ 10-16-2002: Message edited by: Brad ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 33 of 57
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    It sucks
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 34 of 57
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    Adobe Myriad?



    Sounds like communism to me.



    Someone e-mail me that font!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 35 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by Leonis:

    <strong>It sucks </strong><hr></blockquote>Just in case you missed it the first time...



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 36 of 57
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    It still sucks



    Okay...this is my last time
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 37 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by ShawnPatrickJoyce:

    <strong>Looks Cool!



    Although it would be nice to have FUNCTIONAL "Speed Holes." It's just a design element without a purpose... that's not good design. Who am I kidding though? This is an Apple related site- form over function right?



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>



    most design "elements" don't have a purpose. That is why they are called "design elements". From a purely compositional standpoint, the speedhols are serving to balance out the design by adding an element related to the theme of the site to the design. Without the speedholes, that top bar would be heavy on the left.



    From a human interface perspective, it is wasted space that could be better filled with information Graphical excellence is that which gives to the viewer the greatest number of ideas in the shortest time with the least ink in the smallest space However, that does not mean you should ignore basic foundation design "rules" (I don't like using the word rules, as I shouldn't be able to tell you how to do your art, but you get the idea)



    One of my favorite quotes...



    "Confusion and clutter are failures of design, not attributes of information." - Edward Tufte
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 38 of 57
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    [quote]Originally posted by Leonis:

    <strong>It still sucks



    Okay...this is my last time </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Good, I can emulate Bradbot.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 39 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by Brad:

    <strong></strong><hr></blockquote>



    WHat kind of gun has a pentagon-shaped barrel?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 40 of 57
    [quote]Originally posted by BobtheTomato:

    <strong>WHat kind of gun has a pentagon-shaped barrel?</strong><hr></blockquote>That's a snapshot from a computer game. Most 3D shoot-em-ups don't bother to waste a whole bunch of polygons into somethng as small and insignificant as shells.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.