Apple's biggest introduction on Tuesday: Apple Park

13»

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 46
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,687member
    Soli said:
    melgross said:
    Also, I wonder if Apple Park isn’t simply named that because most of it is a PARK, with grass, bushes, trees, and paths for walking and bicycle riding, just like a - park.
    There are many definitions of park, bu the simplest is common one that uses an adjective or noun modifier, like industrial park, for an area devoted to a specified purpose. This is Apple Park, which means it's an area devoted to Apple.
    Yeah, we kinda know that. But it’s also, like, a real park.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 46
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,687member

    gatorguy said:
    melgross said:
    DED simply can’t write a positive article about Apple without saying something nasty about its competitors. 
    Validation comes to mind. No need for it but that's how some seem to quantify worth. Not claiming that's DED's reason as only he knows why. 
    It bothers me, and some others, because it’s isnt necessary. Apple can stand on their own.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 46
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,687member
    melgross said:
    DED simply can’t write a positive article about Apple without saying something nasty about its competitors. Also, I wonder if Apple Park isn’t simply named that because most of it is a PARK, with grass, bushes, trees, and paths for walking and bicycle riding, just like a - park.
    Dan is pointing out the imbalance in criticism of Apple versus its competitors. There has been criticism of Apple that they are wasting money and resources, time and energy building Apple Park, that they "should" have been spending on design of new products, while Google and MS have blown billions of dollars on acquisitions that have cost them dearly. And yet they have not paid for their miscues in the sense of stock valuations and negative media attention. 

    Keep writing, Dan! Your takes on tech and Apple are right on the nose and fun to read. 


    DED doesn’t have to do that in an Apple centric site. Except for a very small number of trolls that we attract, we’re all in the same ballpark on Apple here. If people really need to read those put downs to make themselves feel better, then they have problems.

    he also tends to exaggerate, and simply gets things wrong.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 46
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,687member
    kenc said:
    melgross said:
    DED simply can’t write a positive article about Apple without saying something nasty about its competitors. Also, I wonder if Apple Park isn’t simply named that because most of it is a PARK, with grass, bushes, trees, and paths for walking and bicycle riding, just like a - park.
    That's his signature style. It's his nickel, let him spend it.
    It’s embarrassing.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 45 of 46
    badmonkbadmonk Posts: 1,352member
    Thanks DED, once again.  I always love how you pick the comment blister open!

    Many people criticised this project, amazing when Apple does the right thing, the collective memory forgets the criticism in the end...next up...ditching the headphone jack criticism..."i don't recall anyone saying that was a bad idea."
    watto_cobrajony0
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.